scholarly journals A (Head) Case for a Mad Humanities: Sula's Shadrack and Black Madness

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayley C. Stefan

This article calls for literary studies and the humanities to critically engage with the emerging subfield of Mad Studies. Developing alongside anti-psychiatry activism and Disability Studies, Mad Studies critiques how mentally and emotionally disabled individuals evidence the breadth of state violence and discrimination. After tracing a genealogy of Mad Studies, the article offers a model of a Mad literary studies approach by analyzing Shadrack from Toni Morrison's Sula (1973) as a complex figure which resists flattened readings of Black madness. The novel's scholarly history, while rich in Disability Studies readings, makes evident persistent societal neglect of distressed characters—especially distressed characters of color—as peripheral or symbolic. This article pulls from critical race theory, Disability Studies, and trauma studies to form an intersectional inquiry into the material and lived conditions of mad individuals of color. In so doing, the article demonstrates the significant possibilities of this developing interdisciplinary methodology.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Oliveira de Almeida ◽  
Luana Adriano Araújo

A Critical Race Theory (CRT) pode ser conceituada como um quadro referencial que performa uma leitura racializada das relações de classe, e uma leitura de classe das relações étnico-raciais. Os Disability Studies (DS), por sua vez, consistem no programa teórico pautado pela análise dos significados e das concepções de deficiência em sociedade. Engendrada na interseccionalidade entre essas perspectivas, a DisCrit surge como um campo emergente na teoria crítica, que busca reconhecer e aprofundar as influências mútuas entre a Critical Race Theory (CRT) e os Disability Studies (DS). Sua meta imediata é descrita como o integral endereçamento da realidade interseccional de corpos marcados pela negritude e pela deficiência. Há, contudo, um objetivo estrutural de fundamentação da DisCrit, consistente no entrelaçamento dos conceitos de raça e deficiência a partir da crítica da normalidade. A partir disso, buscamos, como objetivo geral, reanalisar a estabilidade conceitual da interseccionalidade como instrumento teórico para entender a experiência da pessoa negra com deficiência. Nossos objetivos específicos são: compreender a DisCrit e seu lugar nos estudos brasileiros de deficiência; tratar da interseccionalidade como cruzamento de duas ou mais categorias socialmente marginalizadas; e propor uma noção de interseccionalidade que redefina normalidades em cor e funcionamentos. Partimos do esforço por compreender se a DisCrit, fundamentada na interseccionalidade entre raça e deficiência, endereça adequadamente as estruturas de opressão geradas pela normalidade. A metodologia utilizada pautou-se por uma pesquisa hipotético-dedutiva, com abordagem qualitativo-descritiva e com aporte fundamental na revisão bibliográfica. Apontamos para a conclusão teórica de que a DisCrit é relevante quando sustentada em uma abordagem interseccional intercategorial sensível à maneira como diferentes marcadores (estampas) sociais recaem sobre um mesmo corpo. No campo do levantamento de literatura brasileira, apontamos para a necessidade de aprofundamento de estudos que contemplem raça e deficiência como categorias enredadas por uma concepção de normalidade.


Author(s):  
Tita Chico

Abstract Abstract The titles reviewed in this chapter concern science and medicine studies. They represent work drawn from a variety of contexts and disciplinary perspectives, including science and technology, the history of science, literary studies, critical race theory, public health, the philosophy of science, law, ethnography, anthropology, architecture, and geology. The chapter has five sections: 1. Histories and Historicity; 2. Epistemology and Dissemination; 3. Institutions and Praxis; 4. Bodies and Subjectivities; and 5. Conversations (Journals).


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 554-558
Author(s):  
David Jaulus

DisCrit places scholars from the field of Disability Studies (DS) in conversation with those from Critical Race Theory (CRT). Specifically, dis/ability is put into conversation with class- and race-based analyses to formulate an intersectional framework1. The concept of intersectionality has taken on heightened importance within Disability Studies in recent years. While Discrit is primarily intended for scholars and aspiring academics, the text also directly speaks to people like me, who identify as dis/abled.


2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-38
Author(s):  
Eleanor K Jones

Abstract Since the earliest days of European expansionism, Africa has held a dual place in the Western imaginary, cast as a space of futurelessness even as white futurities were predicated on its exploitation. Appropriations of the future have persisted post-liberation, revealed in the divestment of futurity from bodies marked as queer or disabled. Drawing on historical moments and literary texts from Mozambique, Uganda and Zimbabwe, and on insights from queer theory, critical race theory and disability studies, I seek to demonstrate that the logics of white supremacy can be seen at work in these mechanisms of exclusion, even where whiteness itself is displaced – but that literary invocation of queerness and disability can thus be used to mobilize critique of this continuity. In centring the circumscription of futurity at the heart of colonialism, heteronormativity and ableism, then, I underscore the critical value of reading these as reciprocal and inextricable systems of power.


Reified Life ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 249-270
Author(s):  
J. Paul Narkunas

The conclusion brings together and extends some general lines of argument within the book. The book closes with several axioms to question the present reification of life and to offer strategies for non-market living, a user’s guide to living ahumanly that marks affinities and points of critique with new ecologies, disability studies, critical race theory, feminism, animal rights scholars, materialists and realists, and object-oriented ontologists.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-56
Author(s):  
Cara Costelnock

Throughout the text, Capper explores critically oriented epistemologies such as Critical Race Theory; LatCrit, Asian, TribalCrit, and Black Crit; Disability Studies theories; feminist theories; Queer Theory, and theories of intersectionality. In each chapter she presents teaching suggestions and discussion questions to use within the classroom as well as discussion questions aimed to help aspiring leaders critically analyze their leadership strengths and limitations in order to integrate these epistemologies into practice. This review examines the suggestions for creating a learning environment that honors the diversities and strengths students bring to the classroom.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document