scholarly journals A Geographic Perspective on Opioid Misuse: Substance Abuse Treatment Deserts in Southwestern Ohio

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Linnea Lowe ◽  
Cole Brokamp ◽  
Erika Rasnick ◽  
Eric S. Hall ◽  
Shauna Acquavita

Background: The opioid crisis is one of the most pressing public health issues facing Ohio, with an impact uneven-ly distributed across the state. This work examined geographical barriers to substance abuse treatment in southwestern Ohio through examining geographical areas with limited access to substance abuse treatment services and identifying substance abuse treatment deserts. Methods: The study domain included the 13 counties in the Ohio Mental Health and Addiction Service's Cincinnati region. Publicly available substance use disorders treatment data were collected from government agency resources, pharmaceutical websites, and web searches. Substance abuse treatment deserts were defined as areas in the 13-county study area that were not within a 15-minute drive from a treatment center. Results: We found large portions of the study region that were considered a substance abuse treatment desert for methadone and naltrexone/buprenorphine clinics, behavioral health treatment centers, and both medicated assisted treatment (MAT) and behavioral health treatment combined. Out of the 2 017 337 total persons living in the 13-county study area, 17% (n = 342 872) live in a desert for all MAT and behavioral treatment. Similarly, 19.7% (n = 396 581) live in a desert for naltrexone/buprenorphine treatment, 60.9% (n = 1 227 560) live in a desert for methadone treatment, and 19.7% (n = 396 581) live in a desert for behavioral health treatment. Conclusion: We successfully defined substance abuse treatment deserts in southwestern Ohio, which will be useful for future research to determine its association with opioid-related health outcomes. This resource is publicly available online (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4011051).

Society ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew F. Baird ◽  
Candice S. Campanaro ◽  
Joanna L. Eisele ◽  
Thomas Hall ◽  
James D. Wright

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Winterfield ◽  
Jennifer Castro

An ever-increasing number of prisoners need substance abuse treatment, yet state and federal governments continue to cut funding for prison programs. Given this increased need coupled with reduced service availability, two crucial questions arise: (1) Are limited drug treatment resources being targeted to those with the greatest need? and, (2) Is the most being made of these scarce resources by providing continuity of care? Through an analysis of pre- and post-release data collected from 576 prisoners in Illinois and Ohio, this study examines the degree to which prisoners with self-reported drug problems receive in-prison substance abuse treatment services, and then receive post-release treatment. The study also identifies several individual-level predictors of successful treatment matching and continuity. Although the study finds some evidence of treatment matching, its extent is far less than desirable, and there is minimal continuity of treatment from prison to the community. Collectively, the results suggest that differences in offender motivation and readiness for treatment as well as deficiencies in correctional service delivery play a major role in the success of treatment matching. Suggestions are offered for improvements in correctional policy and practice and for future research on these topics.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haider Abdulrazzaq Abed Al-Darraji ◽  
Kee Cheong Wong ◽  
David Gan Eng Yeow ◽  
Jeannia Jiani Fu ◽  
Kelsey Loeliger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document