CONTRIBUIÇÕES DOS HERSCHEL PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO DA CIÊNCIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (55) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caren Lorensi ◽  
Deise Aparecida Rosa
Keyword(s):  

A humanidade estabelece vínculos investigativos sobre o céu há muito tempo e desde que se tem o registro de suas primeiras verificações até o momento, muitas coisas mudaram: o conhecimento a respeito do universo se expandiu, planetas e outros corpos celestes foram descobertos, o Sol e sua relação com a Terra ficaram melhor compreendidos. Com o passar do tempo, estabeleceram-se estudos mais difundidos na área, houve melhorias nos equipamentos de pesquisa e, com isso, um número maior de pessoas vem atuando nesta área científica. Os irmãos William e Caroline Herschel começaram a investigar os céus da Inglaterra ainda no século XVIII com seus telescópios artesanais. Caroline colocou seu nome na ciência e carregou consigo as honras de ter sido a primeira mulher reconhecida oficialmente como astrônoma, bem como membro da prestigiada Royal Society. William consagrou-se como astrônomo, construtor de telescópios e passou seu conhecimento às gerações seguintes, iniciando por John Herschel, seu filho. John continuou os trabalhos do pai e da tia, além de contribuir para outras áreas, pois seus interesses iam desde as ciências naturais e exatas até as artes. Este trabalho apresenta um resumo da história dos Herschel que, mesmo tendo contribuído para a ciência, seus nomes são pouco conhecidos em sala de aula. Os esforços científicos de William e Caroline Herschel, que de músicos tornaram-se astrônomos renomados, pode ser visto como incentivo nos dias atuais.

Having undertaken the magnetic survey of the Indian Archipelago at the recommendation of the Royal Society, I think a slight sketch, detailed as briefly as possible, of my operations may not be uninteresting to Sir John Herschel and the Committee of Physics of which he is Chairman, prior to the publication of the Survey. I trust likewise I have acted strictly in accordance with the wishes of those who so kindly recommended me for the Survey, and I hope that my earnest efforts to do my duty will gain for me that approbation which I have under no ordinary difficulties incessantly striven to obtain. I will in the first place mention the different stations I visited, and then describe in a few words, the way in which the observations were taken.


2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEE T. MACDONALD

AbstractBuilt in 1769 as a private observatory for King George III, Kew Observatory was taken over in 1842 by the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS). It was then quickly transformed into what some claimed to be a ‘physical observatory’ of the sort proposed by John Herschel – an observatory that gathered data in a wide range of physical sciences, including geomagnetism and meteorology, rather than just astronomy. Yet this article argues that the institution which emerged in the 1840s was different in many ways from that envisaged by Herschel. It uses a chronological framework to show how, at every stage, the geophysicist and Royal Artillery officer Edward Sabine manipulated the project towards his own agenda: an independent observatory through which he could control the geomagnetic and meteorological research, including the ongoing ‘Magnetic Crusade’. The political machinations surrounding Kew Observatory, within the Royal Society and the BAAS, may help to illuminate the complex politics of science in early Victorian Britain, particularly the role of ‘scientific servicemen’ such as Sabine. Both the diversity of activities at Kew and the complexity of the observatory's origins make its study important in the context of the growing field of the ‘observatory sciences’.


1852 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 463-562 ◽  

The following researches originated in a consideration of the very remarkable phenomenon discovered by Sir John Herschel in a solution of sulphate of quinine, and described by him in two papers printed in the Philosophical Transactions for 1845, entitled ‘On a Case of Superficial Colour presented by a Homogeneous Liquid internally colourless,’ and 'On the Epipolic Dispersion of Light.’ The solution of quinine, though it appears to be perfectly transparent and colourless, like water, when viewed by transmitted light, exhibits nevertheless in certain aspects, and under certain incidences of the light, a beautiful celestial blue colour. It appears from the experiments of Sir John Herschel that the blue colour comes only from a stratum of fluid of small but finite thickness adjacent to the surface by which the light enters. After passing through this stratum, the incident light, though not sensibly enfeebled nor coloured, has lost the power of producing the same effect, and therefore may be considered as in some way or other qualitatively different from the original light. The dispersion which takes place near the surface of this liquid is called by Sir John Herschel epipolic , and he applies the term epipolized to a beam of light which, having been transmitted through a quiniferous solution, has been thereby rendered incapable of further undergoing epipolic dispersion. In one experiment, in which sun-light was used, a feeble blue gleam was observed to extend to nearly half an inch from the surface. As regards the dispersed light itself, when analysed by a prism it was found to consist of rays extending over a great range of refrangibility: the less refrangible extremity of the spectrum was however wanting. On being analysed by a tourmaline, it showed no signs of polarization. A special experiment showed that the dispersed light was perhaps incapable, at any rate not peculiarly susceptible, of being again dispersed. In a paper 'On the Decomposition and Dispersion of Light within Solid and Fluid Bodies,’ read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1846, and printed in the 16th volume of their Transactions, as well as in the Philosophical Magazine for June 1848, Sir David Brewster notices these results of Sir John Herschel’s, and states the conclusions, in some respects different, at which he had arrived by operating in a different way. The phenomenon of internal dispersion had been discovered by him some years before, and is briefly noticed in a paper read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1833. It is described at length, as exhibited in the particular case of fluor-spar, in a paper communicated to the British Association at Newcastle in 1838. In Sir David Brewster’s experiments the sun’s light was condensed by a lens, and so admitted into the solid or fluid to be examined; which afforded peculiar facilities for the study of the phenomena. On examining in this way a solution of sulphate of quinine, it was found that light was dispersed, not merely close to the surface, but at a long distance within the fluid: and Sir David Brewster was led to conclude that the dispersion produced by sulphate of quinine was only a particular case of the general phenomenon of internal dispersion. On analysing the blue beam by a rhomb of calcareous spar, it was found that a considerable portion of it, consisting chiefly of the less refrangible rays, was polarized in the plane of reflexion, while the more refrangible of its rays, constituting an intensely blue beam, had a different polarization.


Charles Babbage (1791-1871) is often referred to as the forefather of the computer. However, none of his ambitious plans for mechanical ‘calculating engines’ were realized, and in this respect he died a disappointed and embittered man. Ironically, his work had no influence on the development of modern electronic computing, yet it is now recognized that he foreshadowed many of today’s computing techniques. Perhaps Babbage is best described as a prophet with honour. Recent research in the Herschel Archive at the Royal Society has shed new light on the Government’s decision to abandon Babbage’s ‘Difference Engine No. 1' in 1842, and uncovered Sir John Herschel’s role in the affair.


The Reports received by the Secretaries, from Sir John Herschel, Professor Airy, and Captain Smyth, on the Fluid-lens Telescope constructed for the Royal Society on Mr. Barlow’s principles, were, by direction of His Royal Highness the President and Council, read to the Society at this meeting. Sir John Herschel's Report. I have seen Mr. Barlow’s telescope at Cambridge, and examined it on several objects, in a very fine night, the 25th (if I remember) of June. As I have now no time to give it any further trial at Slough, (where I have no longer, either, any achromatic telescope of sufficient power to compare it with, all my apparatus being dismounted and in course of packing,) I will here state in few words, as my report on it, all I could then collect relative to its action. 1. Achromaticity .—Mr. Barlow’s telescope is remarkably free from the dispersion of colour, very much more so than I could have expected from the nature of the correcting medium, and nearly or quite as much as could be desired.


1870 ◽  
Vol 18 (114-122) ◽  
pp. 212-216 ◽  

From a comparison of the different accounts of “Hemiopsia,” “Halfvision,” or “Half-blindness,” given by Dr. Wollaston (Phil. Trans. 1824, p. 222), M. Arago (Annales de Chimie et de Physique, tom. xxvii. p. 102), Sir David Brewster (Phil. Mag. 1865, vol. i. p. 503, and Transactions of Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. xxiv. part 1), the Astronomer Royal (Phil. Mag. July 1865, vol. ii. p. 19), Professor Dufour (in a letter to the Astronomer Royal), Sir John Hersehel (Familiar Lectures on Scientific Subjects, p. 406, Lecture IX., and private letters), Sir CharlesWlieatstone (in a private letter), Mr. Tyrrell (On the Diseases of the Eye, 1840, vol. ii. p. 231), and the author of this paper, it is plain that there are different forms of transient Hemiopsia, irrespective of the wide primary distinction between the transient and permanent forms, which have all been included under the same name Hemiopia or Hemiopsia. It seems that Wollaston, Arago, Brewster, and Tyrrell are describing one form of the transient affection, while Sir John Herschel, Sir Charles Wheatstone, the Astronomer Royal, Professor Dufour, and the author agree in describing another.


Marie Boas Hall, All scientists now: the Royal Society in the nineteenth century , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Pp. xii + 261, £25.00. ISBN: 0-521-26746-3. The effort and meticulous scholarship which characterized Hall’s studies of 17th century science and which (together with the work of her husband) transformed the study of the Scientific Revolution and laid the foundations for current studies of this period, have been utilized in this history of the Royal Society in the 19th century. As with her work on Henry Oldenburg and the formative years of the Royal Society in the 17th century, she has found in the 19th century a period of extraordinary interest. The study opens with the Society, unbeknown to itself, only half way through the Presidency of Joseph Banks. The Society’s Fellowship comprised those who were what we would now call scientists (though few professionals) and those who were interested in natural knowledge either intellectually or for practical purposes - there being a very strong contingent of Admiralty and Naval Fellows who were closely connected with Banks’s patronage. When the study ends, in 1899, the Society was composed mainly of professional scientists. The first half of the book shows how this change was wrought by professional scientists consciously striving to exclude those Fellows representing broader cultural interests - thereby depriving the Society of many non-scientists who would, like their predecessors, have been useful Fellows in forging links between the Society and other parts of society. Thus the election of the Duke of Sussex against John Herschel for President in 1830 is well discussed, as is the subsequent reform movement leading up to the change of the Statutes in 1847. The second half of the book is devoted to discussing what the Society did, apart from act as a meeting place for Fellows to learn about each others’ work. This concentrates on the encouragement of science (and of scientific exploration), relations with other learned societies and with the government. It is in these latter two subjects that the chief motors propelling the Society to restrict membership almost entirely to practising scientists are to be found.


1869 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 223-233 ◽  

Since the communication of my brief abstract “On a new Series of Chemical Reactions produced by Light,” the experiments upon this subject have been continued, and the number of the substances thus acted on considerably augmented. New relations have also been established between mixed vapours when subjected to the action of light. I now beg to draw the attention of the Royal Society to two questions glanced at incidentally in the abstract referred to,—the blue colour of the sky, and the polarization of skylight. Reserving the historic treatment of the subject for a more fitting occasion, I would merely mention now that these questions constitute, in the opinion of our most eminent authorities, the two great standing enigmas of meteorology. Indeed it was the interest manifested in them by Sir John Herschel, in a letter of singular speculative power, that caused me to enter upon the consideration of these questions so soon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document