scholarly journals XXX. On the change of refrangibility of light

1852 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 463-562 ◽  

The following researches originated in a consideration of the very remarkable phenomenon discovered by Sir John Herschel in a solution of sulphate of quinine, and described by him in two papers printed in the Philosophical Transactions for 1845, entitled ‘On a Case of Superficial Colour presented by a Homogeneous Liquid internally colourless,’ and 'On the Epipolic Dispersion of Light.’ The solution of quinine, though it appears to be perfectly transparent and colourless, like water, when viewed by transmitted light, exhibits nevertheless in certain aspects, and under certain incidences of the light, a beautiful celestial blue colour. It appears from the experiments of Sir John Herschel that the blue colour comes only from a stratum of fluid of small but finite thickness adjacent to the surface by which the light enters. After passing through this stratum, the incident light, though not sensibly enfeebled nor coloured, has lost the power of producing the same effect, and therefore may be considered as in some way or other qualitatively different from the original light. The dispersion which takes place near the surface of this liquid is called by Sir John Herschel epipolic , and he applies the term epipolized to a beam of light which, having been transmitted through a quiniferous solution, has been thereby rendered incapable of further undergoing epipolic dispersion. In one experiment, in which sun-light was used, a feeble blue gleam was observed to extend to nearly half an inch from the surface. As regards the dispersed light itself, when analysed by a prism it was found to consist of rays extending over a great range of refrangibility: the less refrangible extremity of the spectrum was however wanting. On being analysed by a tourmaline, it showed no signs of polarization. A special experiment showed that the dispersed light was perhaps incapable, at any rate not peculiarly susceptible, of being again dispersed. In a paper 'On the Decomposition and Dispersion of Light within Solid and Fluid Bodies,’ read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1846, and printed in the 16th volume of their Transactions, as well as in the Philosophical Magazine for June 1848, Sir David Brewster notices these results of Sir John Herschel’s, and states the conclusions, in some respects different, at which he had arrived by operating in a different way. The phenomenon of internal dispersion had been discovered by him some years before, and is briefly noticed in a paper read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1833. It is described at length, as exhibited in the particular case of fluor-spar, in a paper communicated to the British Association at Newcastle in 1838. In Sir David Brewster’s experiments the sun’s light was condensed by a lens, and so admitted into the solid or fluid to be examined; which afforded peculiar facilities for the study of the phenomena. On examining in this way a solution of sulphate of quinine, it was found that light was dispersed, not merely close to the surface, but at a long distance within the fluid: and Sir David Brewster was led to conclude that the dispersion produced by sulphate of quinine was only a particular case of the general phenomenon of internal dispersion. On analysing the blue beam by a rhomb of calcareous spar, it was found that a considerable portion of it, consisting chiefly of the less refrangible rays, was polarized in the plane of reflexion, while the more refrangible of its rays, constituting an intensely blue beam, had a different polarization.

1869 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 223-233 ◽  

Since the communication of my brief abstract “On a new Series of Chemical Reactions produced by Light,” the experiments upon this subject have been continued, and the number of the substances thus acted on considerably augmented. New relations have also been established between mixed vapours when subjected to the action of light. I now beg to draw the attention of the Royal Society to two questions glanced at incidentally in the abstract referred to,—the blue colour of the sky, and the polarization of skylight. Reserving the historic treatment of the subject for a more fitting occasion, I would merely mention now that these questions constitute, in the opinion of our most eminent authorities, the two great standing enigmas of meteorology. Indeed it was the interest manifested in them by Sir John Herschel, in a letter of singular speculative power, that caused me to enter upon the consideration of these questions so soon.


1845 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  

In reasoning on the peculiar coloured dispersion operated on a portion of a beam of white light intromitted into a solution of sulphate of quinine, it occurred to me as a subject well worthy of inquiry whether the rays so selected for dispersion and thus singularly separated from the rest, were distinguished by any other peculiarity; whether in effect an analysis of the incident light into two distinct species qualitatively different had been performed, or merely a simple subdivision , such as takes place, for instance, in partial reflexion, as in the phenomena of the colours of thin plates. Another interesting subject of inquiry presents itself in the laws which regulate this singular mode of dispersion itself, which, for brevity, I shall venture to call (at least provisionally) epipölic ,from ϵπ'πo⋋ἠ , a surface, the seat of the dispersion being at or very near the intromitting surface. As regards the question of analysis, two modes of examination present themselves, viz. either,—1, by subjecting the dispersed portion of the light to experiment, or, 2, the residual portion, which, having escaped dispersion, preserves the unity of its direction; and on that account, as well as by reason of its vastly superior intensity, offers itself more readily to experimental inquiry.


1881 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 307-353 ◽  

1. In Vol. XX. (1872) of the Proceedings of the Royal Society (pp. 160-168) is a beautiful paper by the late Professor Clerk Maxwell giving an investigation of the induction of currents in an infinite plane sheet of uniform conductivity. For the purposes of the investigation the sheet is supposed infinitely thin; and when it is at rest and influenced by a varying external magnetic system, the effect of the currents induced in it is found to be equivalent to an infinite train of images, at the sheet, of the external system, which, after being formed, move off to infinity with uniform velocity. When the external system revolves uniformly round an axis normal to the sheet, the effect is shown to be the same as if the sheet itself revolved round the axis and the magnetic system remained fixed. The images will then lie in a spiral trail in the form of a helix whose axis is perpendicular to the sheet. This theory was afterwards reproduced in his ‘Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism,’ and the latter part proved directly from the equations. The analysis there given is somewhat difficult to follow, though it is doubtless possible to present it in a more logically exact form. The problem of the induction of currents has also been treated by Felici (Tertolini’s ‘Annali,’ 1853-54) and by Jochmann (Crelle, 1864, and Pogg. Ann., 1864). Jochmann has solved the case of a sphere which rotates uniformly in a magnetic field symmetrical about the axis of revolution and finds that no currents will be generated in it, but that there will be a certain distribution of free electricity throughout its interior and over its surface. He has also handled the case of an infinite plate of finite thickness, which revolves uniformly round a normal, by neglecting the inductive action of the currents on themselves, and shows that the conditions of the problem may then be satisfied by a system of currents parallel to the faces of the plate; he has also traced the forms of the current and equipotential lines in some simple cases. The solution, however, as Maxwell has shown in the case of a thin copper disc, can be true only for very small values of the angular velocity.


Having undertaken the magnetic survey of the Indian Archipelago at the recommendation of the Royal Society, I think a slight sketch, detailed as briefly as possible, of my operations may not be uninteresting to Sir John Herschel and the Committee of Physics of which he is Chairman, prior to the publication of the Survey. I trust likewise I have acted strictly in accordance with the wishes of those who so kindly recommended me for the Survey, and I hope that my earnest efforts to do my duty will gain for me that approbation which I have under no ordinary difficulties incessantly striven to obtain. I will in the first place mention the different stations I visited, and then describe in a few words, the way in which the observations were taken.


The author was led into the researches detailed in this paper by considering a very singular phenomenon which Sir John Herschel had discovered in the case of a weak solution of sulphate of quinine, and various other salts of the same alkaloid. This fluid appears colourless and transparent, like water, when viewed by transmitted light, but exhibits in certain aspects a peculiar blue colour. Sir John Herschel found that when the fluid was illuminated by a beam of ordinary daylight, the blue light was produced only throughout a very thin stratum of fluid adjacent to the surface by which the light entered. It was unpolarized.


1865 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-71
Author(s):  
Edward Sang

In the year 1861 I laid before the Royal Society of Edinburgh a theorem concerning the time of descent in a circular arc, by help of which that time can be computed with great ease and rapidity. A concise statement of it is printed in the fourth volume of the Society's Proceedings at page 419.The theorem in question was arrived at by the comparison of two formulæ, the one being the common series and the other an expression given in the “Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine” for November 1828, by a writer under the signature J. W. L. Each of these series is reached by a long train of transformations, developments, and integrations, which require great familiarity with the most advanced branches of the infinitesimal calculus; yet the theorem which results from their comparison has an aspect of extreme simplicity, and seems as if surely it might be attained to by a much shorter and less rugged road. For that reason I did not, at the time, give an account of the manner in which it was arrived at, intending to seek out a better proof. On comparing it with what is known in the theory of elliptic functions, its resemblance to the beautiful theorem of Halle became obvious; but then the coefficients in Halle's formulæ are necessarily less than unit, whereas for this theorem they are required to be greater than unit.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (21) ◽  
pp. eaaz3646 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lee ◽  
T. Luo

Optical pulling force (OPF) can make a nanoparticle (NP) move against the propagation direction of the incident light. Long-distance optical pulling is highly desired for nano-object manipulation, but its realization remains challenging. We propose an NP-in-cavity structure that can be pulled by a single plane wave to travel long distances when the spherical cavity wrapping the NP has a refractive index lower than the medium. An electromagnetic multipole analysis shows that NPs made of many common materials can receive the OPF inside a lower index cavity. Using a silica-Au core-shell NP that is encapsulated by a plasmonic nanobubble, we experimentally demonstrate that a single laser can pull the Au NP-in-nanobubble structure for ~0.1 mm. These results may lead to practical applications that can use the optical pulling of NP, such as optically driven nanostructure assembly and nanoswimmers.


Author(s):  
Roberto de Andrade Martins

In 1840, James Prescott Joule submitted to the Royal Society a paper describing experimental research on the heat produced by electric currents in metallic conductors, and inferring that the effect was proportional to the resistance of the conductors and to the square of the intensity of the current. Only an abstract of this paper was published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society , although a full paper with a similar title was printed in the Philosophical Magazine in 1841. Several authors have assumed that the content of the 1841 publication was the same as the rejected 1840 paper; however, the unpublished manuscript has been found within the archives of the Royal Society and is published here for the first time, along with a detailed analysis and comparison with the 1841 paper. The unpublished version is much shorter, and is different in certain respects from the published article. A detailed comparison throws light on several shortcomings of the unpublished version. The present work also studies the assessment of Joule's paper by the Royal Society, and elucidates the roles of Peter Roget and Samuel Christie in this connection.


Professor Stromeyer, Foreign Memb. R.S., presented two speci­mens, one of the coarse-grained, the other of the fine-grained variety, of the remarkable mass of iron lately discovered near Magdeburg, and an account of which had been laid before the Royal Society of Got­tingen on the 14th of last month. This iron was found, in several de­tached lumps, about four feet below the mould, by Mr. Kote, who considered himself the more authorized to pronounce it meteoric, as, in the chronicles of Magdeburg, the descent of a fiery meteor is re­corded as having happened in the year 938. Professor Stromeyer has subjected this iron to a minute analysis, the results of which are very-interesting, inasmuch as, besides the alloy of nickel and cobalt, usually present in meteoric iron, he unexpectedly found a considerable portion of molybdenum, — a rare metal on our planet, occurring only in two combinations, viz. with sulphur, as glance molybdenum, and, as molybdic acid combined with oxide of lead, in the yellow lead ore of Carinthia and a few other places.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document