scholarly journals Genetic and biochemical features of the monogenic hereditary urolithiasis

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-325
Author(s):  
D.S. Mikhaylenko ◽  
M.Y. Prosyannikov ◽  
A. Baranova ◽  
M.V. Nemtsova

Urolithiasis is a common urological problem. In most cases, this multifactorial pathology develops due to the combination of inherited low-penetrance gene variants and environment factors such as urinary tract infections and unbalanced diet. However, some cases are monogenic. These hereditary forms of urolithiasis manifest in childhood, and are characterized by multiple, bilateral and recurrent kidney stones and progress to chronic renal failure relatively early. Due to widening acceptance of exome and gene panel sequencing, substantially larger percentages of urolithiasis cases are now attributed to hereditary causes, up to 20% among patients of 18 years old or younger. Here we review genetic and biochemical mechanisms of urolithiasis, with an emphasis on its hereditary forms, including fermentopathies (primary hyperoxaluria, adenine phosphorobosyltransferase deficiency, phosphoribosyl-pyrophosphate-synthetase deficiency, xanthinuria, Lesch-Nihan syndrome) and these caused by membrane transport alterations (Dent's disease, familial hypomagnesia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis, hypophosphatemic urolithiasis, distal tubular acidosis, cystinuria, Bartter's syndrome). We suggest a comprehensive gene panel for NGS diagnostics of the hereditary urolithiasis. It is expected that accurate and timely diagnosis of hereditary forms of urolithiasis would enable the counselling of the carriers in affected families, and ensure personalized management of the patients with these conditions.

Author(s):  
Arun Shastry ◽  
Sankaramoorthy Aravind ◽  
Meeta Sunil ◽  
Keerthi Ramesh ◽  
Berty Ashley ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii426-iii426
Author(s):  
Dominik Sturm ◽  
Felix Sahm ◽  
Felipe Andreiuolo ◽  
David Capper ◽  
Marco Gessi ◽  
...  

Abstract The large variety of CNS tumor entities affecting children and adolescents, some of which are exceedingly rare, results in very diverging patient outcomes and renders accurate diagnosis challenging. To assess the diagnostic utility of routine DNA methylation-based CNS tumor classification and gene panel sequencing, the Molecular Neuropathology 2.0 study prospectively integrated these (epi-)genetic analyses with reference neuropathological diagnostics as an international trial for newly-diagnosed pediatric patients. In a four-year period, 1,215 patients with sufficient tissue were enrolled from 65 centers, receiving a reference neuropathological diagnosis according to the WHO classification in >97%. Using 10 FFPE sections as input, DNA methylation analysis was successfully performed in 95% of cases, of which 78% with sufficient tumor cell content were assigned to a distinct epigenetic tumor class. The remaining 22% did not match any of 82 represented classes, indicating novel rare tumor entities. Targeted gene panel sequencing of >130 genes performed for 96% of patients with matched blood samples detected diagnostically, prognostically, or therapeutically relevant somatic alterations in 48%. Germline DNA sequencing data indicated potential predisposition syndromes in ~10% of patients. Discrepant results by neuropathological and epigenetic classification (29%) were enriched in histological high-grade gliomas and implicated clinical relevance in 5% of all cases. Clinical follow-up suggests improved survival for some patients with high-grade glioma histology and lower-grade molecular profiles. Routine (epi-)genetic profiling at the time of primary diagnosis adds a valuable layer of information to neuropathological diagnostics and will improve clinical management of CNS tumors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1346-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria C. Aspromonte ◽  
Mariagrazia Bellini ◽  
Alessandra Gasparini ◽  
Marco Carraro ◽  
Elisa Bettella ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 372 (23) ◽  
pp. 2243-2257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas F. Easton ◽  
Paul D.P. Pharoah ◽  
Antonis C. Antoniou ◽  
Marc Tischkowitz ◽  
Sean V. Tavtigian ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 3401-3409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenwu Xu ◽  
Jiawei Dai ◽  
Dandan Wang ◽  
Hui Lu ◽  
Heng Dai ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 438-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Hoon Na ◽  
Saeam Shin ◽  
Donghwa Yang ◽  
Borahm Kim ◽  
Heung Dong Kim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 1141-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Zheng ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Aparna Pallavajjalla ◽  
Lisa Haley ◽  
Lukasz Gondek ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Amar ◽  
Amar J. Majmundar ◽  
Ihsan Ullah ◽  
Ayesha Afzal ◽  
Daniela A. Braun ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. ii41-ii41
Author(s):  
A. Veiser ◽  
K. Kaulich ◽  
S. Stepanow ◽  
M. Wolter ◽  
K. Kohrer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document