scholarly journals Clinicopathological evaluation of acute appendicitis and the role of ultrasound in diagnosis: a prospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1471
Author(s):  
Tony Mathew ◽  
Amit Shivshankar Ammanagi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common acute surgical condition of the abdomen. Delay in treatment of acute appendicitis causes lot of complication. Study was done with the objective to study the clinical and pathological presentations of acute appendicitis, to evaluate the role of ultrasound in early diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to reduce negative appendicectomy in patients.Methods: This is a prospective study done on 100 patients with acute right lower abdominal pain clinically presumed to be of appendicular origin. A thorough history, clinical examination and ultrasound scan, was done for all cases. All ultrasound positive cases were subjected to surgery and some negative cases were also taken for surgery based on clinical suspicion. The ultrasound diagnosis was compared with clinical findings, operative findings and histopathological examination reports.Results: The overall accuracy of clinical diagnosis (Alvarado scoring system) with histopathology findings was 72%. The overall sensitivity and specificity was 70.3% and 81.3% respectively and positive predictive value of was 95.2% whereas the negative predictive value was 34.2%. The overall accuracy of ultrasound with histopathology report was 93%, with a sensitivity of 96.4%, specificity of 75%, and a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 80%. Negative appendicectomy rate was 8.82% in females and 3.63% in males.Conclusions: The Alvarado scoring system combined with ultrasound can therefore be used as a cheap and inexpensive way of confirming acute appendicitis thus reducing negative appendicectomy rate.

scholarly journals Correlation of Ultrasound and RIPASA Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Rai Bansal ◽  
Suvendu Sekhar Jena ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: Correlation of Ultrasound and RIPASA scoring system in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Study Design: 50 patients presenting to emergency underwent ultrasound and evaluation as per RIPASA scoring system followed by emergency appendicectomy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value calculated for each goups. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value for ultrasound were 75.51%, 100%, 100% and 7.69% respectively and that for RIPASA scoring system were 93.9%, 100% 100% and 25% respectively. The negative appendicectomy rate was 2%. Conclusion: RIPASA scoring system may be used for correctly diagnosing acute appendicitis but low sensitivity of ultrasound precludes its routine use and may be used as a complementary tool in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Keywards: Acute Appendictis, RIPASA, Ultrasound.

scholarly journals Correlation of Ultrasound and RIPASA Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (r) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Rai BANSAL ◽  
Suvendu Sekhar JENA ◽  
Sanjeev KUMAR
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: Correlation of Ultrasound and RIPASA scoring system in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Study Design: 50 patients presenting to emergency underwent ultrasound and evaluation as per RIPASA scoring system followed by emergency appendicectomy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value calculated for each goups. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value for ultrasound were 75.51%, 100%, 100% and 7.69% respectively and that for RIPASA scoring system were 93.9%, 100% 100% and 25% respectively. The negative appendicectomy rate was 2%. Conclusion: RIPASA scoring system may be used for correctly diagnosing acute appendicitis but low sensitivity of ultrasound precludes its routine use and may be used as a complementary tool in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Keywards: Acute Appendictis, RIPASA, Ultrasound.

scholarly journals Comparison of Tzanakis Score vs Alvarado Score in the Effective Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
BR Malla ◽  
H Batajoo
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Effective Diagnosis ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background Acute appendicitis is the most frequent surgical emergency encountered worldwide. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of Tzanakis score and Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis.Objectives The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Tzanakis scoring system with Alvarado scoring system in diagnosing AA.Methods This was a retrospective and nonrandomized observational study conducted in Dhulikhel hospital. It included 200 clinically diagnosed cases of acute appendicitis who underwent emergency open or laparoscopic appendectomy during the year 2012. Final diagnosis of acute appendicitis was based on histological findings given by pathologist.Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Tzanakis score was 86.9%, 75.0, 97.5% and 33.3% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Alvarado score was 76.0%, 75.0%, 97.2% and 21.4% respectively. Negative appendectomy was 8.0%. Conclusion Tzanakis scoring system is an effective scoring system in diagnosing acute appendicitis.Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.12(1) 2014: 48-50

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis Between RIPASA and Alvarado Scoring Systems for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis- A Nepalese Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Baral ◽  
Neeraj Thapa ◽  
Raj Kumar Chhetri ◽  
Rupesh Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Introduction: Various diagnostic criteria have been described for acute appendicitis. For decades the most commonly used one has been Alvarado score. RIPASA scoring system has also been developed for Asian population which has shown highest sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to compare these two diagnostic criteria in Nepalese population attending a tertiary center. Methods: Patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis were classified according to both Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems before undergoing surgery. Histopathological examination was taken as the gold standard for diagnosis. Statistical analysis was done using McNemar's test as applicable. Results: Ninety nine (90 %) patients had histologically confirmed appendicitis. With the cut-off value greater than 7.5 for RIPASA score; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and negative appendectomy rates were 94.5%, 27.27 %, 92.16 %, 37.5 %, 88.18% and 7.84% respectively. With the cut-off value greater than 7 for Alvarado score, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and negative appendectomy rates were 71.72%, 72.73 %, 95.95 %, 22.22%, 71.82 %, and 4.05 % respectively. 94.5% of patients were correctly stratified by RIPASA under higher probability group while only 71.8 % were classified by Alvarado (p value= 0.0001). Conclusion: RIPASA scoring system showed high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in comparison to Alvarado scoring system. So, this method can be applied in Nepalese setting for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals Modified alvarado score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a clinicopathological study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 878
Author(s):  
Sanjay Jain ◽  
Ajay Gehlot ◽  
M. C. Songra
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Diagnostic Modality ◽  
Delay In Diagnosis ◽  
Modified Alvarado Score

Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the commonest surgical emergencies in all ages. Diagnosis is mainly clinical, delay in diagnosis definitely increases the morbidity, mortality and cost of treatment, more aggressive surgical approach has resulted in increased white appendectomies.Methods: A total 100 cases hospitalized with abdominal pain, suggestive of acute appendicitis on the basis of modified Alvarado scoring system and were subsequently operated, were included in the present study in our institute for period of 20 Months.Results: Males belonging to young age group of 21-30 were most commonly affected. Abdominal pain was seen in 100% of patients. Fever seen in 87% of patients and vomiting in78%. Modified Alvarado score of 9 had positive predictive value of 100% while negative predictive value 8.9%, while score between 7-8 had positive predictive value of 98.9% and negative predictive value 27.8%. The sensitivity was 86.1% and specificity was 83.3%. The ultrasonography showed a sensitivity of 94.68%. In present study rate of total white appendectomy was 6%. The Modified Alvarado scoring system is a reliable and practicable diagnostic modality to increase the accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis and thus to minimise unnecessary appendectomy.Conclusions: Young males are most commonly affected almost always presents with abdominal pain. The Modified Alvarado scoring system is a reliable and practicable diagnostic modality to increase the accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis and thus to minimise unnecessary appendectomy.

scholarly journals The Value of Bacterial Culture During Clean Orthopedic Surgery a Prospective Study of 1,036 Patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Bernard ◽  
Christophe Sadowski ◽  
Daniel Monin ◽  
Richard Stern ◽  
Blaise Wyssa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Postoperative Infection ◽  
Bacterial Culture ◽  
Bacterial Cultures ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
A Prospective Study

AbstractObjective:To determine whether bacterial cultures of the wounds of patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery would help predict infection.Methods:During 1 year, 1,256 cultures were performed for 1,102 patients who underwent clean orthopedic surgery. Results were analyzed to evaluate their ability to predict postoperative infection.Results:The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the cultures were 38%, 92%, 7%, and 99%, respectively.Conclusions:Cultures performed during clean orthopedic surgery were not useful for predicting postoperative infection.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS USING ULTRASOUND

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 315-321
Author(s):  
Abdullah Hamdan ◽  
◽  
Nasraldeen Alnaeem M. Alkhidir ◽  
Abdelmoneim Saeed ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Histopathological Report

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mainly clinical and to confirm the clinical diagnosis ultrasonography (USG) of the abdomen is being used to help in diagnosis of the disease. To find out the role of USG in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in clinically equivocal cases and to correlate USG findings with histopathological reports (HPR) of removed appendix.Total numbers of 100 patients were included in the study from 12March 2019 to 5 December 2019. Findings on ultrasound were finally compared with histopathological report of appendices removed on surgery. Those cases with alternate diagnosis were followed up and proved with other means of investigation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in our study were found to be 79 %, 84.20 %, 95.50%, 48.40% and 80% respectively.

scholarly journals Role of TRUS and MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer-A Prospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanika Bhambri ◽  
Alok Kumar Pandey ◽  
Anupam Jhobta ◽  
Amit Bhambri ◽  
Sanjiv Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnostic Purpose ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
A Prospective Study

Introduction: Prostate cancer ranks second among all cancers affecting men. Common diagnostic tests like Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) are suboptimal for diagnostic purpose. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has a promising role in detection, guidance for targeted biopsy and staging of prostate cancer. Aim: To evaluate the role of TRUS and MRI in the detection of prostate cancer and to ascertain if any functional parameter or union of parameters is of any utility in detection of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted which included fifty patients who underwent TRUS and 1.5-T MRI before being subjected toTRUS-guided biopsy. Imaging was compared with histopathological results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio for each of the investigation was calculated. Results: The accuracy of the model combining all the imaging variables {T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), MR spectroscopy (MRS), Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI), Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI} in predicting prostate cancer was 94%, which was higher than the diagnostic accuracy of each variable considered alone (DWI, 92%; ADC, 92%; MRS, 88.0%; DCE-MRI, 92%; and T2WI, 72%). TRUS had a diagnostic accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 67.7%, PPV of 65.5% and NPV of 100.0%. Conclusion: TRUS had a high sensitivity and negative predictive value but a low specificity. MRI had both high sensitivity and specificity especially when the combination of functional sequences was used. But, the addition of a third functional technique does not further improve detection. Thus, a limited number of functional sequences are needed in every MRI study for prostatic cancer. However, DWI being the most valuable should be included as one of the sequences.

scholarly journals A comparative study of RIPASA score and modified Alvarado score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 3937
Author(s):  
Waleed Yusif El Sherpiny
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Ripasa Score

Background: Various diagnostic criteria have been described for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Of these, Alvarado score has been the most commonly used. The RIPASA score is a new diagnostic scoring system developed for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and showed higher sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy as compared to Alvarado score. we want to compare prospectively Alvarado and RIPASA score by applying them to patients attending emergency department complaining of right iliac fossa pain that could probably be acute appendicitis.Methods: Patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis were classified according to both Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems before undergoing surgery. Histopathological examination of the removed appendix was taken as the gold standard for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Results: Among (90%) patients had histologically confirmed appendicitis. With the cut-off value greater than 7.5 for RIPASA score; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy  were 88.2%, 14.5%, 73.1%, 32%,and 68% respectively. With the cut-off value greater than 7 for Alvarado score, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy and negative appendectomy rates were 51.2%, 80 %, 91 %, 29%, and 57%, respectively. 87.5% of patients were correctly stratified by RIPASA under higher probability group while only 45% were classified by Alvarado as high probability.Conclusions: RIPASA scoring system showed high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in comparison to Alvarado scoring system. So, it can be applied   for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document