scholarly journals An evaluation of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3147
Author(s):  
M. Zaid Imbisat ◽  
S. A. A. Rizvi ◽  
Imad Ali
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Gallbladder Perforation ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Delayed Group

Background: Acute cholecystitis is one of the hepatopancreatobiliary emergencies. With more and more experience in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy studies are being carried out evaluating the effectiveness and feasibility of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.Methods: Fifty patients presenting with acute cholecystitis were included in this study and randomized using chit in the box method into two groups- early group and delayed group.Results: Mean duration of surgery in the early group is 42.28±5.99 mins and in the delayed group is 39.12±5.55 mins (p=0.06). Gallbladder perforation was reported in 4 patients (16%) in early group and in 2 patients (8%) in delayed group (p=0.67). Gall stone spillage was reported in 3 patients (12%) in early group and in 2 patients (8%) in delayed group (p=1.00). At 6th hr mean VAS (visual analogue scale) score in the early group was 4.0±0.41 and in the delayed group it was 3.6±0.58 (p=0.01). At 12th hr mean VAS score in the early group was 3.4±0.51 and in the delayed group it was 3.3±0.48 (p=0.39). Mean duration of postoperative stay was 2.24±0.60 days in early group and in the delayed group it was 2.08±0.57 days (p=0.34).Conclusions: It has been found that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in the setting of acute cholecystitis with added advantage of shorter total hospital stay.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rati Agrawal ◽  
K. C. Sood ◽  
Bhupender Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Group

Background. The role of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholelithiasis is not yet established. The aim of our prospective randomized study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early LC for acute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed LC.Methods. Between March 2007 to December 2008, 50 patients with diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were assigned randomly to early group,n=25(LC within 24 hrs of admission), and delayed group,n=25(initial conservative treatment followed by delayed LC, 6–8 weeks later).Results. We found in our study that the conversion rate in early LC and delayed LC was 16% and 8%, respectively, Operation time for early LC was 69.4 min versus 66.4 min for delayed LC, postoperative complications for early LC were 24% versus 8% for delayed LC, and blood loss was 159.6 mL early group versus 146.8 mL for delayed group. However early LC had significantly shorter hospital stay (4.1 days versus 8.6 days).Conclusions. Early LC for acute cholecystitis with cholelithiasis is safe and feasible, offering the additional benefit of shorter hospital stay. It should be offered to the patients with acute cholecystitis, provided that the surgery is performed within 96 hrs of acute symptoms by an experienced surgeon.

scholarly journals Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushant Verma ◽  
P. N. Agarwal ◽  
Rajandeep Singh Bali ◽  
Rajdeep Singh ◽  
Nikhil Talwar
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Initial Period ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Introduction. Very few studies demonstrate the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. However, most surgeons prefer to delay surgery in the acute phase. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Materials and Methods. Between August 2010 and March 2012, 30 patients with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 h of admission. This study group was compared with a control group of 30 patients of acute cholecystitis, who underwent delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after an initial period of conservative treatment. Results. There was no significant difference in the conversion rates (3 early versus 2 delayed), postoperative analgesia requirements, postoperative pain scores, or duration of postoperative stay (1.67 days early versus 1.47 days delayed). However, duration of surgery was significantly more in the early group (65.78 minutes early versus 56.83 minutes delayed). Surgery was abandoned in 2 patients from the early group because of difficult anatomy. No complications and mortality were seen in either group. Conclusions. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is safe and feasible, offering the additional benefit of a shorter hospital stay. It should be offered to patients with acute cholecystitis, provided the surgery is performed within 72 h from the onset of symptoms.

scholarly journals LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (02) ◽  
pp. 313-318
Author(s):  
MOHAMMAD ADNAN NAZEER ◽  
HASAAN IMTIAZ ◽  
HARUN MAJID DAR ◽  
Zulfiqar Ali ◽  
Asma Samreen
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Cholecystectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Group ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Group ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of acute cholecystitis is still controversial. Objective:The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the outcomes of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy foracute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed cholecystectomy. Setting: Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: 1st Feb,2012 to 31st July 2012. Materials & Methods: 60 diagnosed patients of acute cholecystitis were randomly allocated to two groups,Group 1 underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Group 1, n = 30) and Group 2 to initial conservative treatment followed bydelayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 6 to 12 weeks later (Group 2 , n = 30). Results: The overall complication rate was 3.3% (01) inearly group and 16.7% (05) in the delayed group. There was no common bile duct injury in both groups. The complications includedwound infection and intraperitoneal collection. Conclusions: According to the results our study we concluded that early laparoscopiccholecystectomy can safely be carried out for acute cholecystitis as the complications for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy are lessas compared to delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy has also an edge over delayed because ofsingle hospital stay.

scholarly journals A comparative study of early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
RP Yadav ◽  
S Adhikary ◽  
CS Agrawal ◽  
B Bhattarai ◽  
RK Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Total Leukocyte Count ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Group ◽  
The Mean

Aims and Objectives: To compare the outcome in early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of frequency of intra-operative and postoperative complications and to determine the rate and reasons for conversion. Materials and methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in the Department of Surgery at BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences from February 2003 to June 2004 in all patients with the diagnosis of acute calculus cholecystitis. Results: Out of 145 cases, 50 cases were included in our study where 12 (24%) patients were males and 38 (76%) were females (M:F=1:3.16). The mean (SD) age of patients in early and delayed groups were 42.68 yrs. (14.18) and 40.26 yrs. (11.62) respectively. The mean (SD) duration of symptoms in early successful and converted groups were 109.24 hrs. (43.66) and 132 hrs. (49.96) respectively and the mean (SD) duration of symptoms in delayed successful and converted groups were 15.36 months (13.88) and 41 months (40.73) respectively. In early group, 17 (68%) patients had total leukocyte count more than 10,000/cmm and they had ultrasound findings suggestive of acute cholecystitis. Out of 25 patients in early group, seven had jaundice and ten had deranged liver function in the preoperative period. In early group 4 (16%) patients; and in delayed group 3 (12%) had to be converted to open cholecystectomy (P=1.00). In early group 10 (40%) and in delayed 5 (20 %) cases had intra-operative complications (P=0.122). The total hospital stay was longer in the delayed group. The postoperative hospital stay in early and delayed converted groups were higher than early and delayed successful group (P=0.081, P=0.082). Conclusion: Both early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy is possible and safe in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Key words: Acute cholecystitis, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Conversion doi: 10.3126/kumj.v7i1.1759       Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2009), Vol. 7, No. 1, Issue 25, 16-20   

scholarly journals ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (04) ◽  
pp. 489-491
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD FAISAL BILAL LODH ◽  
SUMERA KANWAL ◽  
MUHAMMAD AKRAM
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Early Group ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Effective Technique ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Symptomatic Gallstones ◽  
Late Group

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been accepted as the treatment of choice for symptomatic gallstones. Its efficacy and timingin cases of acute cholecystitis is still under debate. This study was undertaken to evaluate our experience with early cholecystectomy as a safe,effective treatment of acute cholecystitis. M a t e r i a l s a n d m e t h o d s : Record of all the patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis was reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups on the bases of onset of symptoms to surgical intervention: less than 72 hours in the early group (n = 15) and more than 72 hours in the late group (n = 25). Results: Conversion to openprocedure was insignificantly less (3 out of 15 in early group and 8 out Of 25 in late group) (20% versus 32%) in the early treated patients (pvalue0.411). Furthermore, the operative time (75 versus 95 minutes) postoperative hospitalization (2 versus 4 days) and total hospital stay (4versus 6 days) were significantly reduced in patients undergoing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. C o n c l u s i o n : Laparoscopiccholecystectomy is a safe, effective technique for acute cholecystitis in experienced hands with lower conversion rate, shorter operative timeand reduced hospitalization.

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Safety and Outcomes of Early versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Wei Zhou ◽  
Xiao-Dong Gu ◽  
Jian-Bin Xiang ◽  
Zong-You Chen
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Clinical Safety ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Objective.To compare the clinical safety and outcomes of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.Methods.Pertinent studies were selected from the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases, references from published articles, and reviews. Seven randomized controlled trials (early laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy) were selected. Conventional meta-analysis according to Cochrane Collaboration was used for the pooling of the results.Results.Seven trials with 1106 patients were included. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of bile duct injury (Peto odds ratio 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.05 to 4.72);P=0.54) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (risk ratio 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.20);P=0.50). The total hospital stay was shorter by 4 days for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (mean difference −4.12 (95% confidence interval −5.22 to −3.03) days;P<0.00001).Conclusion.Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy during acute cholecystitis is safe and shortens the total hospital stay.

scholarly journals EARLY LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS AT ESI PGIMSR, BASAIDARAPUR, NEW DELHI

2020 ◽  
pp. 21-23
Author(s):  
Rakesh Kumar Thakur ◽  
Tanweer Karim ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Acute Attack ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Cost Of Treatment ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Cost

Background: Approximately 80% of the cholecystectomies are performed laparoscopically. Traditionally, acute cholecystitis is treated conservatively followed by delayed cholecystectomy 6-8 weeks after the acute attack. Various studies have addressed the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with acute cholecystitis. The aim of this study was to compare early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 60 patients presenting with acute cholecystitis to compare early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, focussing on intra-operative and postoperative parameters like duration of surgery, surgical difficulties and complications, analgesic requirement, duration of postoperative hospital stay and wound related complications. Results: Longer operation times were required in the early group. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements were almost similar in two groups. The cost of treatment in the delayed group was significantly higher. Conclusion: Though early laparoscopic cholecystectomy required longer operative times, it resulted in reduced the cost of treatment than delayed LC.

scholarly journals Outcome of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahid Mohd Rather ◽  
Nighat Ara Majid ◽  
Mohd Nazrull Islam ◽  
Raja Waseem Mohd
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Total Hospital Stay ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
The Cost

Background: This prospective randomized study was undertaken to to assess the outcomes of early versus delayed cholecystectomy for patient’s acute cholecystitis.Methods: 70 patients with acute cholecystitis were prospectively randomized to either an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=35) or a delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (n=35). The mean operative time, conversion rate, total hospital stay, intra-operative and post-operative complications, average hospital cost were evaluated between the two groups.Results: A total of 70 patients were enrolled, 35 patients in each group. There was no significant difference in the conversion rates (early, 8.57% vs delayed, 5.71%) and postoperative complications (early, 25% vs delayed, 20%). At the cost of an increased operating time (early, 81 minutes vs delayed, 78 minutes) and blood loss (early, 180.33ml vs delayed, 108.00 ml), early laparoscopic cholecytectomy significantly shortened the total hospital stay (early, 1.5 days vs. delayed, 7.95 days) and  average hospital cost (early 9240 INR vs delayed, 12251 INR).Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were comparable in terms of morality, morbidity and conversion rate. However early laparoscopic cholecystectomy allows significantly shorter  total hospital stay and reduction in days away from work at the cost of  longer operating time and blood loss and offers definitive treatment at initial admission. Moreover it avoids repeated admissions for recurrent symptoms has both medical as well as socioeconomic benefits and should be the preferred approach for patients managed by surgeons with adequate experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Time to abandon the old dictum of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis has settled in Caribbean practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 004947552110100
Author(s):  
Shamir O Cawich ◽  
Avidesh H Mahabir ◽  
Sahle Griffith ◽  
Patrick FaSiOen ◽  
Vijay Naraynsingh
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Gallstone Disease ◽  
Acute Attack ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Surgery ◽  
Delayed Cholecystectomy ◽  
Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for acute cholecystitis, many Caribbean surgeons are reluctant to operate during the acute attack. We collected data for all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from January 1 to 31 December 2018. Delayed cholecystectomy was done >6 weeks after acute cholecystitis settled. We compared data between early and delayed groups. Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 54 patients, and 42 had early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Delayed surgery resulted in significantly more complications requiring readmission (39% vs 0), longer operations (2.27 vs 0.94 h) and lengthier post-operative hospitalisation (1.84 vs 1.1 days). Caribbean hospitals should abandon the practice of delayed surgery after cholecystitis has settled. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy would be financially advantageous for our institutions, and it would save patients recurrent attacks of gallstone disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document