scholarly journals Management of maxillary deficiency in a growing child with facemask therapy and RME- A case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-170
Author(s):  
Pooja U ◽  
Naveen Aravind ◽  
Rajkumar S Alle ◽  
Lokesh NK ◽  
Mayank Trivedi
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Skeletal Effects ◽  
Environmental Causes ◽  
Maxillary Deficiency

Class III malocclusion is one of the most difficult problems to treat. It has a multifactorial etiology involving both genetic and environmental causes. The dental and skeletal effects of maxillary protraction with a facemask are well documented in several studies. Although incorporation of expansion appliance along with facemask therapy can improve correcting both sagittal and transverse discrepancy of maxilla. The following case shows early treatment of a 9 year old boy with maxillary deficiency using an expansion screw along with facemask. Facemask therapy was followed by fixed orthodontic treatment to settle the occlusion. Treatment was completed after 14 months with positive overjet, class I molar and canine relationship on right and left side.

scholarly journals Treatment of Class III with Facemask Therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Snigdha Pattanaik ◽  
Sumita Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Young Patient ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Permanent Dentition ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Skeletal Effects ◽  
Environmental Causes ◽  
Maxilla And Mandible

Class III malocclusion is one of the most difficult problems to treat in the mixed dentition. It has a multifactorial etiology involving both genetic and environmental causes. The dental and skeletal effects of maxillary protraction with a facemask are well documented in several studies. Although treatment in the late mixed or early permanent dentition can be successful, results are generally better in the deciduous or early mixed dentition. The following case shows early treatment of a young patient with severe sagittal and transverse discrepancy of the maxilla and mandible, using a facemask.

scholarly journals Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion : A Case Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
SN Rita ◽  
SMA Sadat ◽  
MZ Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Anterior Open Bite

Reported case of a 19 years old male, with Class III malocclusion, bilateral cross bite associated with anterior open bite, which was treated by fixed orthodontic treatment. After treatment there was a class I Molar and incisor relation as well as the open bite was corrected with accepted aesthetic and functional satisfaction of the patient. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v1i1.15974 Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, October 2010; Vol-1, No.1, 22-23

Traumatically Induced Maxillary Retrusion—A Case Report of Orthodontic Management with the Protraction Headgear

1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
P. A. Banks ◽  
W. H. P. Bogues
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Surgical Reduction ◽  
Traumatic Episode ◽  
Removable Orthodontic Appliances

A 46-year-old male Caucasian with traumatically induced maxillary retrusion was referred for orthodontic treatment, eight weeks after the original fracture had occurred. Initial surgical reduction and fixation had been successful, when a second traumatic episode was encountered. This resulted in a further degree of posterior maxillary displacement, which was resistant to further surgical reduction. The resulting Class III malocclusion was treated using maxillary protraction headgear, in conjunction with removable orthodontic appliances and intermaxillary traction. Appliances were worn full time and inter-arch correction was achieved in six months. The resulting occlusion proved to be stable following the cessation of active treatment.

scholarly journals Modified hyrax splint for rapid maxillary expansion in esthetically concerned patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 118-119
Author(s):  
Sarabjeet Singh Sandhu ◽  
Taruna Puri ◽  
Navreet Sandhu
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Routine Procedure ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Deciduous Molars ◽  
Maxillary Deficiency

The orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion with a maxillary deficiency is often treated with maxillary protraction either with or without maxillary expansion. The routine procedure for rapid maxillary expansion includes banding on first premolars/first deciduous molars and the permanent first molars. However in some patients who are esthetically very conscious, banding of the first premolar would not be a good esthetic option. So for such circumstances we have designed a modified hyrax splint, which does not need the first premolars to be banded.

Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy

1998 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiziano Baccetti ◽  
Jean S. McGill ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
James A. McNamara ◽  
Isabella Tollaro
Keyword(s):  
Early Treatment ◽  
Face Mask ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Skeletal Effects

scholarly journals Direct Anterior Tracks: Early and Functional Management of Class III Malocclusions—Case Report and Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Echeverry Juan Carlos ◽  
Barbosa-Liz Diana
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Innovative Treatment ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Functional Management

The prevalence of class III malocclusion ranged from 0 to 26% in different populations. Many types of treatments have been described in dental literature. The results of early treatment have been positive. The purpose of this report is to describe the case of a four-year-old patient with class III malocclusion who received an innovative treatment using direct anterior tracks. This therapy efficiently obtained immediate improvement of profile and occlusal relationships.

scholarly journals Optimal force for maxillary protraction facemask therapy in the early treatment of class III malocclusion

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 586-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliana Yepes ◽  
Paula Quintero ◽  
Zulma Vanessa Rueda ◽  
Andrea Pedroza
Keyword(s):  
Early Treatment ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Optimal Force

Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Hoon Lee ◽  
Sang-Duck Koh ◽  
Dong-Hwa Chung ◽  
Jin-Woo Lee ◽  
Sang-Min Lee
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Skeletal Anchorage ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Residual Growth

Summary Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the results of skeletal anchorage (SAMP) and tooth- borne (TBMP) maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in growing skeletal Class III patients. Materials and methods Patients treated with maxillary protraction were selected and classified into two groups (SAMP: n = 19, mean age = 11.19 years; TBMP: n = 27, mean age = 11.21 years). Lateral cephalograms taken before treatment (T0), after the maxillary protraction (T1), and after the fixed appliance treatment (T2) were analysed and all variables were statistically tested to find difference between the two groups. Results Compared to the TBMP, the SAMP showed significant forward growth of maxilla (Co-A point and SN-Orbitale) and improvement in intermaxillary relationship (ANB, AB to mandible plane, and APDI) after the overall treatment (T0–T2), with no significant sagittal changes in maxilla or mandible throughout the fixed appliance treatment (T1–T2). Limitations In maxillary protraction, effects of skeletal anchorage were retrospectively compared with those of dental anchorage, not with Class I or III control. Conclusions and implications After maxillary protraction, skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage did not cause significant differences in the residual growth of maxilla throughout the phase II treatment. Orthopaedic effects with skeletal anchorage showed appropriate stability in maxilla and intermaxillary relationship even after fixed appliance treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document