scholarly journals More than Advice: Increasing Industry Advisory Board Member Involvement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Jones
Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2866-2866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassie Chou ◽  
Simon Fraessle ◽  
Rachel Steinmetz ◽  
Reed M. Hawkins ◽  
Tinh-Doan Phi ◽  
...  

Background CD19 CAR T immunotherapy has been successful in achieving durable remissions in some patients with relapsed/refractory B cell lymphomas, but disease progression and loss of CAR T cell persistence remains problematic. Interleukin 15 (IL-15) is known to support T cell proliferation and survival, and therefore may enhance CAR T cell efficacy, however, utilizing native IL-15 is challenging due to its short half-life and poor tolerability in the clinical setting. NKTR-255 is a polymer-conjugated IL-15 that retains binding affinity to IL15Rα and exhibits reduced clearance, providing sustained pharmacodynamic responses. We investigated the effects of NKTR-255 on human CD19 CAR T cells both in vitro and in an in vivo xenogeneic B cell lymphoma model and found improved survival of lymphoma bearing mice receiving NKTR-255 and CAR T cells compared to CAR T cells alone. Here, we extend upon these findings to further characterize CAR T cells in vivo and examine potential mechanisms underlying improved anti-tumor efficacy. Methods CD19 CAR T cells incorporating 4-1BB co-stimulation were generated from CD8 and CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors. For in vitro studies, CAR T cells were incubated with NKTR-255 or native IL-15 with and without CD19 antigen. STAT5 phosphorylation, CAR T cell phenotype and CFSE dilution were assessed by flow cytometry and cytokine production by Luminex. For in vivo studies, NSG mice received 5x105 Raji lymphoma cells IV on day (D)-7 and a subtherapeutic dose (0.8x106) of CAR T cells (1:1 CD4:CD8) on D0. To determine optimal start date of NKTR-255, mice were treated weekly starting on D-1, 7, or 14 post CAR T cell infusion. Tumors were assessed by bioluminescence imaging. Tumor-free mice were re-challenged with Raji cells. For necropsy studies mice received NKTR-255 every 7 days following CAR T cell infusion and were euthanized at various timepoints post CAR T cell infusion. Results Treatment of CD8 and CD4 CAR T cells in vitro with NKTR-255 resulted in dose dependent STAT5 phosphorylation and antigen independent proliferation. Co-culture of CD8 CAR T cells with CD19 positive targets and NKTR-255 led to enhanced proliferation, expansion and TNFα and IFNγ production, particularly at lower effector to target ratios. Further studies showed that treatment of CD8 CAR T cells with NKTR-255 led to decreased expression of activated caspase 3 and increased expression of bcl-2. In Raji lymphoma bearing NSG mice, administration of NKTR-255 in combination with CAR T cells increased peak CAR T cell numbers, Ki-67 expression and persistence in the bone marrow compared to mice receiving CAR T cells alone. There was a higher percentage of EMRA like (CD45RA+CCR7-) CD4 and CD8 CAR T cells in NKTR-255 treated mice compared to mice treated with CAR T cells alone and persistent CAR T cells in mice treated with NKTR-255 were able to reject re-challenge of Raji tumor cells. Additionally, starting NKTR-255 on D7 post T cell infusion resulted in superior tumor control and survival compared to starting NKTR-255 on D-1 or D14. Conclusion Administration of NKTR-255 in combination with CD19 CAR T cells leads to improved anti-tumor efficacy making NKTR-255 an attractive candidate for enhancing CAR T cell therapy in the clinic. Disclosures Chou: Nektar Therapeutics: Other: Travel grant. Fraessle:Technical University of Munich: Patents & Royalties. Busch:Juno Therapeutics/Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Equity Ownership; Technical University of Munich: Patents & Royalties. Miyazaki:Nektar Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marcondes:Nektar Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Riddell:Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Lyell Immunopharma: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Turtle:Allogene: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Humanigen: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Nektar Therapeutics: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; T-CURX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor with staff from Juno Therapeutics; pending, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3229-3229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna R. Juluri ◽  
Alexandre V. Hirayama ◽  
Erin Mullane ◽  
Nancy Cleary ◽  
Qian Vicky Wu ◽  
...  

Background Chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CAR-T) directed against CD19 has demonstrated efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies. Delayed hematopoietic recovery with grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, requiring extended growth factor administration or transfusions, has been observed in patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy, although the factors influencing recovery are poorly understood. In this study, we performed multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with hematopoietic recovery in patients undergoing CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 125 patients with R/R acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), treated with CD19-targeted CAR-T cells on a phase 1/2 clinical trial in our institution (NCT01865617). Patients receiving more than one CAR-T infusion were excluded. Criteria for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and recovery were defined as per the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) reporting guidelines: neutropenia, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤ 500/mm3; thrombocytopenia, platelet (Plt) count ≤ 20 x 109/L; neutrophil recovery, ANC > 0.5 x 109/L for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days irrespective of growth factor administration; platelet recovery, Plt > 20 x 109/L for three consecutive values obtained on different days in the absence of platelet transfusion for seven days. For competing risk analysis, an event was defined as having achieved ANC or Plt recovery, with the following considered as competing events: death, new cytotoxic therapy, relapse with marrow involvement in the absence of ANC or platelet recovery. Patients who never met the CIBMTR criteria for neutropenia of thrombocytopenia were considered as having recovered at time = 0. To identify factors associated with impaired hematopoietic recovery after CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, patient-, disease- and CAR-T cell therapy-related variables were included in a multivariable Fine and Gray model prior to variable selection using LASSO penalization (Table 2 footnote). Results We included 125 patients (ALL, n=44; CLL, n=37; NHL, n=44) with a median age of 55 (range, 20-76). Patients were heavily pre-treated with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-10); 31% had undergone prior autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Median ANC and Plt prior to lymphodepletion were 2 x 109/L (range 0-23) and 112 x 109/L, range 3-425), respectively. Patient and treatment characteristics are summarized in Table 1. ANC and Plt recovery after CD19 CAR-T cell therapy were observed in 91% (ALL, 86%; CLL, 92%; NHL, 95%) and 86% (ALL, 86%; CLL, 86%; NHL, 84%) of patients, respectively. Median time to ANC recovery was 9 days and the probability of ANC recovery at day 28, 60, and 90 was 80% (95%CI, 73-87), 86% (95%CI, 80-92) and 89% (95%CI, 83-94), respectively. The probability of platelet recovery on the day of CAR-T cell infusion was 55% (95%CI, 46-64); rising to 74% (95%CI, 67-82), 83% (95%CI, 76-90), and 84% (95%CI, 77-90) at day 28, 60, and 90, respectively. A competing event was always observed in patients without ANC or Plt recovery. In multivariable analysis, higher pre-lymphodepletion Plt count (HR=1.08 per 25 x 109/L increase, p=0.006) and higher peak CD8+ CAR-T cells in blood (HR=1.47 per log10 cells/µL increase, p<0.001) were associated with faster ANC recovery. ALL diagnosis and higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade were associated with slower ANC recovery (CLL vs ALL, HR=1.60, p=0.02; NHL vs ALL, HR=2.07, p=0.007). Higher CRS grade was also associated with slower Plt recovery (HR=0.67 per grade increase, p<0.001). Higher pre-lymphodepletion platelet count and higher peak CD8+ CAR-T cell in blood were associated with faster platelet recovery (HR=1.08 per 25 x 109/L increase, p=0.001; HR=1.41 per log10 cells/µL increase, p<0.001). Of note, lymphodepletion intensity did not seem to affect hematopoietic recovery. Table 2 summarizes the results of the multivariable analysis. Figure 1 shows ANC and Plt recovery by CRS grade. Conclusion We identified CRS grade as independently associated with impaired hematopoietic recovery after CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. Our findings suggest that the prevention of CRS may improve hematopoietic recovery after CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. Figure Disclosures Hirayama: DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Maloney:Celgene,Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BioLine RX, Gilead,Genentech,Novartis: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: patients pending , Research Funding; A2 Biotherapeutics: Honoraria, Other: Stock options . Turtle:Caribou Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nektar Therapeutics: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member, Research Funding; Allogene: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor with staff from Juno Therapeutics; pending, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; T-CURX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Humanigen: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5401-5401
Author(s):  
Cristina M. Joao ◽  
Fernando Gomes ◽  
Catarina Geraldes ◽  
Joana Maria Parreira ◽  
Manuel L Neves ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and severe renal impairment (SRI) have shorter survival and are often excluded from clinical trials. In these patients the use of Lenalidomide (Len) is based in pharmacokinetic models and because of the risk of increased toxicity, Len dose must be adjusted to renal function. Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of relapsed MM patients (RMM) with SRI (baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) <30ml/min) treated with Lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Lendex), including patients under hemodyalisis. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in four Portuguese referral hospitals. All consecutive patients with RMM and SRI treated with Lendex between January 2007 and December 2012 were included. Lendex treatment was considered as the administration of low doses of dexamethasone and Len doses between 25mg/d and 5mg every other day. We evaluated the efficacy (response rate (RR), response duration and impact on renal function) and the relevant toxicities (myelo and neurotoxicity, thrombotic and infectious complications and second primary tumors). Results We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with SRI and RMM treated with Lendex (median CrCl at start of Lendex was 19 ml/min with 13 patients under dialysis): 55% males; median age at diagnosis 63yo; median age at start of Lendex 68yo (51-79); main subtypes were IgGk (45%) and IgGλ (18%); 3 patients with high-risk cytogenetics; 5 plasmocytomas; 1 amyloidosis; 77% received Lenalidomide ≤10mg/d x 21 days in monthly cycles; median 8 cycles (2-50). Median number of previous lines was 2 (1-6). The global RR was 72% (16/22; 12 patients with ≥PR); 6 pts had progressive disease. Five out of 6 (83%) of the patients who progressed with Lendex had prior exposure to thalidomide. Median follow-up from start of Lendex was 14 months (2 – 62). The median time until maximal response was 3 months and the median response duration was 31 months (5 – 55) and in 58% (7/12) the response was longer than 2 years. Eighteen percent had renal improvement (median CrCl improvement of 44ml/min) but all the 13 patients on hemodyalisis maintained the need for this treatment. The treatment was interrupted in 3 cases because of adverse events and all the patients were on thromboprophylaxis with aspirin. In the long-term responders a continuous Len dose adjustment was required mainly because of myelo and neurotoxicity and the dexamethasone dose was reduced according to toxicities (metabolic, fatigue and psychiatric effects). There were no critical infections or second primary tumors. Conclusions CrCl<60 ml/min is a cut-off for Lenalidomide dose reduction. In our experience, after initial dose-adjustment of therapy, there should be a continuous process of dose-adjustment taking into account the individual tolerance, even without additional renal impairment. Lendex dosing adjusted according to CrCl does not negatively impact response or the rate of side effects. It may also have a potential to reverse RI and induce long duration of response. We concluded that Lendex is an effective and safe treatment regimen for relapsed MM patients with severe renal insufficiency. Disclosures: Joao: yassen: member of advisory board, member of advisory board Other; Celgene: member of advisory board, member of advisory board Other. Esteves:Celgene: member of advisory board, member of advisory board Other; Yassen: member of advisory board, member of advisory board Other.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document