scholarly journals A Systematized Literature Review of the Characteristics of Team Mental Models in Engineering Design Contexts

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunhye Kim
Author(s):  
S. Li ◽  
C. Chua

Mental simulation represents how a person interprets and understands the causal relations associated with the perceived information, and it is considered an important cognitive device to support engineering design activities. Mental models are considered information characterized in a person’s mind to understand the external world. They are important components to support effective mental simulation. This paper begins with a discussion on the experiential learning approach and how it supports learners in developing mental models for design activities. Following that, the paper looks at the four types of mental models: object, making, analysis and project, and illustrates how they capture different aspects and skills of design activities. Finally, the paper proposes an alternative framework, i.e., Spiral Learning Approach, which is an integration of Kolb’s experiential learningcycle and the Imaginative Education (IE) framework. While the Kolb’s cycle informs a pattern to leverage personal experiences to reusable knowledge, the IE’s framework suggests how prior experiences can trigger imagination and advance understandings. A hypothetical design of a snow removal device is used to illustrate the ideas of design-related mental models and the spirallearning approach.


2016 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 12-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry S. Delugach ◽  
Letha H. Etzkorn ◽  
Sandra Carpenter ◽  
Dawn Utley

Author(s):  
Sue Yi ◽  
Nicole B. Damen ◽  
Christine A. Toh

Abstract Shared mental models have been shown to enhance team performance. However, research has not observed the different types of sharedness of mental models that may uniquely impact the design process. Therefore, this study examines the types of sharedness of mental models that occur in design teams using Conversation Analysis on data collected from two design teams that performed activities in the early design process in a controlled lab environment. Designers were asked to develop an agreed upon list of ranked design principles, and then generate one or two solutions using the list. These design activities allow for the examination of the varying ways that designers share knowledge, negotiate, and reach understanding. Through our analysis, we identify characteristics of conversation that designers used to build shared understanding. Our results also show how team mental models are built from patterns of conversation that are evident during open-ended and unstructured design discussions. This work sets a foundation for future research to gain a deeper understanding of how designer mental models are shared in unstructured conversations that take place during design practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S50-S56
Author(s):  
Kylie Kidd Wagner ◽  
June Austin ◽  
Lynn Toon ◽  
Tanya Barber ◽  
Lee A. Green

Surgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 161 (5) ◽  
pp. 1203-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee K. Gardner ◽  
Daniel J. Scott ◽  
Kareem R. AbdelFattah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document