THE PRICING OF MARKET LIQUIDITY RISK

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Orkunt Dalgic
Author(s):  
Evangelos Benos ◽  
Michael Wood ◽  
Pedro Gurrola-Perez

2012 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 1250006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank de Jong ◽  
Joost Driessen

This paper explores the role of liquidity risk in the pricing of corporate bonds. We show that corporate bond returns have significant exposures to fluctuations in treasury bond liquidity and equity market liquidity. Further, this liquidity risk is a priced factor for the expected returns on corporate bonds, and the associated liquidity risk premia help to explain the credit spread puzzle. In terms of expected returns, the total estimated liquidity risk premium is around 0.6% per annum for US long-maturity investment grade bonds. For speculative grade bonds, which have higher exposures to the liquidity factors, the liquidity risk premium is around 1.5% per annum. We find very similar evidence for the liquidity risk exposure of corporate bonds for a sample of European corporate bond prices.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-524
Author(s):  
Changha Kim ◽  
Changjun Lee

Previous literature in the Korean stock market has shown that the momentum effect is not observed during pre-2000 period while it is observed during post-2000 period. Given that market illiquidity has substantially decreased during post-2000 period, we examine whether the level of market illiquidity affect the momentum profits. The central findings are summarized as follows. First, our full-sample analysis shows that market liquidity is positively associated with momentum profits, meaning that the observed momentum effect during post-2000 period is related to the decrease in market illiquidity. Second, during pre-2000 period, when the market illiquidity is very high, the illiquidity of past losers is extremely high compared to that of past winners. However, there is no significant difference in illiquidity between winners and losers during post-2000 period. Third, based on this result, we conjecture that the momentum effect is related to the different compensation for liquidity risk between past losers and winners, and test whether this is indeed the case. We find significant momentum profits over the whole period when we consider the compensation for the liquidity risk of past losers and winners. In addition, during pre-2000 period, the return on momentum strategy that controls the liquidity risk is substantially higher than the actually observed momentum profits. In sum, our study suggests that the difference in compensation for liquidity risk between past losers and winners is very important in understanding the momentum effect in the Korean stock market.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-205
Author(s):  
Hyung Tae An ◽  
Seong Mi Bae ◽  
Mun Kee Cho

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 105-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelos Benos ◽  
Pedro Gurrola-Perez ◽  
Michael Wood

Author(s):  
Sebastian Stange ◽  
Christoph Kaserer

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Kumar ◽  
Arun Kumar Misra

<p>Liquidity is said to be the lifeblood of stock markets. It has prominent implications for traders, regulators, stock exchanges and the listed firms. In recent years a huge amount of literature has emerged that deals with liquidity. This article classifies and organises the literature and provides a critical review of the frameworks currently available for modelling liquidity and its macroeconomic and firm specific drivers. Commonality and intraday behaviour of liquidity in various markets is discussed under the umbrella of market microstructures.  Subsequently, liquidity risk as a factor in Asset pricing is analysed taking various models in to consideration. Finally, the study reviewed the impact of liquidity on corporate finance decisions viz. dividends, firm valuation, stock split, capital structure etc.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document