scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY TO EVALUATE ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF CAUDAL MIDAZOLAM AND CLONIDINE POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN CHILDREN

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (25) ◽  
pp. 1447-1450
Author(s):  
Ramalinga Raju A.V.S ◽  
Kalyan Chakrawarthi Y ◽  
Ravikant S
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
Sagar Dilip Vyas ◽  
◽  
Abhijeet Dattatray Waychal ◽  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-246
Author(s):  
Sandip Baheti ◽  
◽  
Maya Jamkar ◽  
Kaushik Cherukuri ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sonali Mahendra Khobragade

Background: Postoperative pain management is a vital factor contributing towards speedy recovery of the patient in the perioperative period without significant morbidity. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of three most frequently used analgesic drugs-intramuscular diclofenac sodium, diclofenac suppository and intravenous tramadol hydrochloride in patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries.Methods: A hospital based, prospective, randomized, comparative study was undertaken in tertiary care hospital for a period of two years. The study included 90 adult patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries in spinal anaesthesia. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed by visual analogue scale. Level of sedation was assessed by four point scale along with haemodynamics.Results: There were no significant changes in the pulse rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure after giving I.M. diclofenac, diclofenac suppository and I.V. tramadol. The mean VAS scores were comparable in all three groups (p>0.05). The level of sedation was more in tramadol group than in diclofenac intramuscular and rectal group which was statistically significant (p=0.001).Conclusions: Diclofenac suppository provides effective postoperative analgesia when compared with Inj. Diclofenac I.M. and Inj. tramadol I.V. in patients undergoing infraumbilical gynaecological surgeries with stable vitals and no side effects.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 1401-1406
Author(s):  
Kiran Nelamangala ◽  
◽  
Nikila Devarayasamudram Gopal ◽  
Ravi Madhusudhana ◽  
Dinesh Krishnamurthy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 645-655
Author(s):  
Johnny Wei Bai ◽  
Dong An ◽  
Anahi Perlas ◽  
Vincent Chan

Local anesthetics (LAs) are commonly infiltrated into surgical wounds for postsurgical analgesia. While many adjuncts to LA agents have been studied, it is unclear which adjuncts are most effective for co-infiltration to improve and prolong analgesia. We performed a systematic review on adjuncts (excluding epinephrine) to local infiltrative anesthesia to determine their analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing properties. Multiple databases were searched up to December 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two reviewers independently performed title/abstract screening and full-text review. Inclusion criteria were (1) adult surgical patients and (2) adjunct and LA agents infiltration into the surgical wound or subcutaneous tissue for postoperative analgesia. To focus on wound infiltration, studies on intra-articular, peri-tonsillar, or fascial plane infiltration were excluded. The primary outcome was reduction in postoperative opioid requirement. Secondary outcomes were time-to-first analgesic use, postoperative pain score, and any reported adverse effects. We screened 6670 citations, reviewed 126 full-text articles, and included 89 RCTs. Adjuncts included opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids, alpha-2 agonists, ketamine, magnesium, neosaxitoxin, and methylene blue. Alpha-2 agonists have the most evidence to support their use as adjuncts to LA infiltration. Fentanyl, ketorolac, dexamethasone, magnesium and several other agents show potential as adjuncts but require more evidence. Most studies support the safety of these agents. Our findings suggest benefits of several adjuncts to local infiltrative anesthesia for postoperative analgesia. Further well-powered RCTs are needed to compare various infiltration regimens and agents.Protocol registrationPROSPERO (CRD42018103851) (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=103851)


HPB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S295-S296
Author(s):  
J. Perrin ◽  
B. Ratnayake ◽  
C. Wells ◽  
H. Lindsay ◽  
S. Pandanaboyana

1978 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulla Aromaa ◽  
Kari Asp

Oral naproxen in doses of 500 mg and 750 mg daily was compared with oral indomethacin, 75 mg daily, in a double-blind, completely randomized study of patients with post-operative pain after out-patient varicose vein surgery. Altogether, 120 patients were studied. In the study 750 mg naproxen proved to be equal in respect of analgesic efficacy to 75 mg indomethacin, and it was clearly superior to 1500 mg acetylsalicylic acid. Naproxen, 500 to 750 mg daily, afforded adequate postoperative analgesia in 98% of patients. The side-effects were mild. On the basis of the study, naproxen can be recommended as a pain-relieving drug after minor surgery, particularly when an antiphlogistic effect is also desirable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document