A Comparison of Naproxen, Indomethacin and Acetylsalicylic Acid in Pain after Varicose Vein Surgery

1978 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulla Aromaa ◽  
Kari Asp
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Acetylsalicylic Acid ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Varicose Vein Surgery ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Minor Surgery

Oral naproxen in doses of 500 mg and 750 mg daily was compared with oral indomethacin, 75 mg daily, in a double-blind, completely randomized study of patients with post-operative pain after out-patient varicose vein surgery. Altogether, 120 patients were studied. In the study 750 mg naproxen proved to be equal in respect of analgesic efficacy to 75 mg indomethacin, and it was clearly superior to 1500 mg acetylsalicylic acid. Naproxen, 500 to 750 mg daily, afforded adequate postoperative analgesia in 98% of patients. The side-effects were mild. On the basis of the study, naproxen can be recommended as a pain-relieving drug after minor surgery, particularly when an antiphlogistic effect is also desirable.

Double-Blind Comparison of Maternal Analgesia and Neonatal Neurobehaviour following Intravenous Butorphanol and Meperidine

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hodgkinson ◽  
Robert W Huff ◽  
Robert H Hayashi ◽  
Farkhanda J Husain
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Foetal Heart Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cervical Dilation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison

Butorphanol (1 mg and 2 mg) and meperidine (40 mg and 80 mg), given intravenously, were evaluated for analgesic efficacy and safety in a double-blind randomized study employing 200 consenting pre-partum patients in moderate to severe pain during the late first stage of labour. Both drugs provided adequate relief of pain to the mothers. There was no significant difference in the rate of cervical dilation, the foetal heart rate, the Apgar score, pain relief or neonatal neurobehavioural scores between those receiving butorphanol and those receiving meperidine. Twenty-two mothers who received butorphanol and eleven who received meperidine nursed their infants with no adverse effects observed. Side-effects were generally infrequent in this study; however, more side-effects were reported by the patients and observed by the investigator in the meperidine-treated cases (13%) than in the cases treated with butorphanol (2%).

scholarly journals POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA WITH INTRAPERITONEAL ROPIVACAINE WITH AND WITHOUT DEXMEDETOMIDINE AFTER TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROLLED TRIAL

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Ranjita Acharya ◽  
Daisy Karan ◽  
Megha Khetan
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Local Anesthetics ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Operative Pain

ABSTRACTObjective: In this advanced era of surgery, laparoscopic hysterectomy operations are very commonly practiced by surgeons. It reduces trauma, morbidity, and health-care costs, ensuring early discharge. However, the early post-operative pain experienced by patients may sometimes negate all the advantages of a laparoscopic procedure. Intraperitoneal (IP) instillation of local anesthetics has been proposed to decrease post-operative pain after laparoscopic surgeries. Additives to local anesthetics like α-2 agonists such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine prolong the duration of analgesia. Therefore, this randomized, prospective, controlled study was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of IP ropivacaine with or without dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia after total laparoscopy hysterectomy.Methods: At the end of laparoscopic hysterectomy, in a double-blind, randomized manner, one of the following injections was given intraperitoneally. The patients were allocated into the following two groups: The patients in ropivacaine group (R group) (N = 40) were given 38 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 2 ml of normal saline (NS) and the patients in ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine group (RD group) (N = 40) were given 38 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine combined with 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (diluted in 2 ml NS) through trocars. All the patients were given diclofenac sodium when they had a pain score of 4 on visual analog scale (VAS).Results: VAS score at different time intervals was significantly lower after the second postoperative hour, time to first request of analgesia (minutes) was longest (487.7±40.96 vs. 242.5±19.84), and the total analgesic consumption (mg) was lowest (61.88±37.55 vs. 183.75±44.78) in RD group than in R group.Conclusion: The antinociceptive effects of the IP instillation of ropivacaine in combination with dexmedetomidine are superior to ropivacaine alone in laparoscopic hysterectomy cases.Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Ropivacaine, Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

scholarly journals Epidural butorphanol for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries: A comparative study with epidural tramadol

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
G P Deo ◽  
S K Shrestha ◽  
I N Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Epidural Injection ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group B

To compare the efficacy of epidural butorphanol and tramadol for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries. Randomized, controlled, double blind, prospective study conducted at Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Chitwan Medical College from September 1st 2015 to August 31st 2016. 60 patients of ASA Grade I and II of either sex, aged between 18-65 years willing for epidural analgesia for post operative analgesia were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group B- Butorphanol group and Group T- Tramadol group. Subjects of Group B received 2mg of Butorphanol and 0.25% Bupivacaine making a total volume of 10 ml and that of Group T received 100mg of Tramadol and 0.25% Bupivacaine also making a total volume of 10 ml. Analgesic efficacy was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The onset and duration of analgesia along with side effects were also assessed. The quality of analgesia was studied using time to independent mobilization and overall patient satisfaction. Total number of patients was 60, of ASA Grade I and II, aged between 18-65 years. The mean age of patients in Group B was 42.6±11.7 years and 46.1±11.2 years in Group T. Time of onset of analgesia after epidural injection was 7.4±0.9 minutes in Group B and 12.7±1.5 minutes in Group T and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Duration of analgesia was 317.1±99.1 minutes and 438.8±136.6 minutes in Butorphanol and Tramadol groups respectively which was also statistically significant. Sedation was significantly higher in butorphanol group whereas nausea and vomiting was higher in tramadol group. Quality of analgesia in terms of patient satisfaction was better with epidural butorphanol. Both epidural tramadol and butorphanol were effective in relieving post operative pain however butorphanol had lesser side effects and greater patient satisfaction compared to tramadol but the duration of action was relatively short.

Local Infiltrative Anesthetic Effect of Tramadol Compared to Lidocaine for Excision of Cutaneous Lesions: Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Despoina Kakagia ◽  
Theodosia Vogiatzaki ◽  
Savvas Eleftheriadis ◽  
Gregory Trypsiannis ◽  
Christos Iatrou
Keyword(s):  
Injection Site ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Cutaneous Lesions ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Pain Scores

Background: In this double-blind, randomized study, the efficacy of tramadol, an atypical opioid, was tested versus lidocaine in excision of cutaneous lesions of the face. Methods: Eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 mg/kg tramadol 2% plus adrenaline 1:200,000 (group T, n = 46) or 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% plus adrenaline 1:200,000 (group L, n = 42) for excision of cutaneous lesions. Pain at the injection site, 2 and 20 minutes postinjection and 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively, was monitored on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Irritation at the injection point and the duration of postoperative analgesia were also recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data, topography, size of the lesions removed, and operative time between the two groups. A tendency toward lower injection NRS pain scores was observed in group L compared to group T (p = .064). No statistically significant differences between the two groups were found at 2 and 20 minutes postinjection (p = .741 and p = .142, respectively); however, pain scores were significantly higher in group L at 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively (all p < .001). Erythema at the injection site was observed in nine group T and two group L patients (p = .076). No postoperative analgesics were required in the tramadol group of patients, whereas acetaminophen with or without codeine was administered in all but five lidocaine group patients during the first 12 hours. Conclusion: Tramadol may be used as a reliable local anesthetic agent, providing longer postoperative analgesia compared to lidocaine; however, it bears a higher incidence of irritation at the injection site.

Analgesic Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Ketorolac Tromethamine and Doleron for the Alleviation of Orthopaedic Post-Operative Pain

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Johansson ◽  
G. Josefsson ◽  
J. Malstam ◽  
A. Lindstrand ◽  
A. Stenstroem
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Oral Dose ◽  
Single Oral Dose ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Ketorolac Tromethamine ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Parallel Group

The analgesic efficacy and safety of ketorolac tromethamine (ketorolac), a potent analgesic with anti-inflammatory and antipyretic activities, were evaluated and compared with Doleron, a combination analgesic, in 115 patients with moderate to severe orthopaedic post-operative pain. This was a randomized, double-blind (double-dummy), parallel-group comparison of a single oral dose of one capsule of 10 mg ketorolac with a single oral dose of two Doleron tablets (each tablet contained 150 mg dextropropoxyphene napsylate, 350 mg aspirin and 150 mg phenazone). During the 6 h following treatment, 80% of ketorolac treated patients and 82% of Doleron treated patients experienced adequate pain relief. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall analgesic efficacy between the treatment groups. Three patients (one on ketorolac, two on Doleron) withdrew because of adverse events (vomiting). Nausea (two patients in each treatment group), vertigo (none on ketorolac, three on Doleron) and sore throat (none on ketorolac, two on Doleron) were the only drug-related adverse events reported by more than one person in a treatment group during the trial. A total of 82% of patients given ketorolac and 76% given Doleron experienced no adverse events. A single oral dose of 10 mg ketorolac was shown to be as effective and safe as two Doleron tablets in the treatment of moderate to severe orthopaedic post-operative pain.

scholarly journals Intraoperative and Postoperative Analgesia Using Intravenous Opioid, Clonidine and Lignocaine

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. de Kock ◽  
P. Lavandhomme ◽  
J. L. Scholtes
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Colonic Surgery ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

The postoperative analgesia afforded after colonic surgery by IV opioid, clonidine and lignocaine given intra- and postoperatively was evaluated. In a double-blind randomised trial, 80 male patients scheduled for colonic resection under general anaesthesia received fentany 15 μg.kg−1 at induction and another 4 μg.kg−1 before skin incision (group A) or fentanyl (same dose) plus clonidine 4 μg.kg−1 in 20 min + 2 μg.kg−1.h−1 (group B, C) or fentanyl plus clonidine (same dosage) plus lignocaine 2 mg.kg−1 before skin incision, repeated before peritoneal incision and retractor placement (group D). In the four groups, intraoperative boluses of fentanyl 2 μg.kg−1 were given in response to the painful stimulation of the procedure. Postoperative pain was managed with PCA delivering 2 mg morphine per request in group A, 1.5 mg morphine in group B, 1.5 mg morphine + 15 μg clonidine in group C and 1.2 mg morphine + 15 μg clonidine + 23 mg lignocaine in group D. Postoperative analgesia was assessed by recording the analgesic demands (met and unmet) and the dose of morphine delivered at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 hours. Side-effects, pain and sedation analogue scores were also recorded. A nalgesic demands and delivered morphine dose were reduced, at any time interval considered, in groups B, C, D, compared with A (P <0.001). No differences were noted between the groups B, C, D. Pain analogue scores were better in groups B, C, D compared with group A (P <0.001). Sedation and side-effects were not increased in groups B, C, D. Intraoperative clonidine was the major determinant of the reduction in analgesic demands and morphine delivered. Lignocaine, at the dose used, failed to afford any additional benefit.

Baricity, Needle Direction, and Intrathecal Sufentanil Labor Analgesia

1997 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 592-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fazeela Ferouz ◽  
Mark C. Norris ◽  
Valerie A. Arkoosh ◽  
Barbara L. Leighton ◽  
Louis M. Boxer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Labor Analgesia ◽  
Labor Pain ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Drug Injection ◽  
Double Blind

Background Intrathecal sufentanil relieves labor pain but centrally mediated side effects are common. Preventing rostral spread of intrathecal sufentanil should limit these side effects. Both direction of the lateral opening of a pencil-point needle and drug baricity modify the spread of intrathecal local anesthetics. This randomized, prospective, double-blind study examines the effects of these variables on intrathecal sufentanil labor analgesia. Methods Forty laboring, full-term parturients, whose cervixes were dilated less than 5 cm and who requested analgesia for labor were enrolled. Combined spinal epidural analgesia was induced in patients in the sitting position. They were allocated to receive 10 micrograms intrathecal sufentanil diluted with either normal saline or dextrose with the aperture of the pencil-point needle directed cephalad or caudad during drug injection. Thus there were four groups of ten patients: dextrose up, dextrose down, saline up, and saline down. Sufentanil was diluted with normal saline to a concentration of 10 micrograms/ml. The study drug was made by mixing 1 ml sufentanil solution with either 1 ml 10% dextrose or 1 ml normal saline. Visual analog scores for pain, pruritus, nausea, and pain relief were recorded before and 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after drug injection. Results Baricity, but not needle orientation, influenced pain relief and pruritus. Sufentanil in dextrose produced less itching but also less analgesia. Nine of 20 women in the dextrose groups compared with 1 of 20 in the saline groups requested additional analgesia by 30 min. Conclusions Little or no labor analgesia developed for patients receiving sufentanil with dextrose. A supraspinal action may contribute to intrathecal sufentanil's analgesic efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document