scholarly journals Exploring Procedural Decision Support Systems for Wicked Problem Resolution

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carianne Pretorius

Wicked problems are hyper-complex problems that are not solvable via traditional methods. Some common examples of these include issues such as poverty, climate change, business strategy, and general policy development, which all have high stakes and no straightforward solution. The ambiguity of these problems can be particularly frustrating for the individuals and organizations that encounter them, as the very essence of these problems is elastic and unstable. Additionally, attempts to tame wicked problems tend to be irrevocable — for better or for worse — as the problem itself shifts in unpredictable ways in response. Decision support systems (DSSs) have long been considered a panacea for a number of highly complex problems in light of their potential to store, retrieve, and manipulate information to aid decision making. However, classical DSSs, being originally intended for semi-structured types of problems, are rendered practically impotent in the presence of wicked problems and their associated complexities. Thus, this article investigates the possibility of DSSs that rely on procedural rationality as an alternative strategy for resolving wicked problems. An empirical literature review is utilized to build and present an integrated, descriptive model for the design, development, and use of such DSSs for resolving wicked problems.

Author(s):  
David Paradice ◽  
Robert A. Davis

Decision support systems have always had a goal of supporting decision-makers. Over time, DSS have taken many forms, or many forms of computer-based support have been considered in the context of DSS, depending on one’s particular perspective. Regardless, there have been decision support systems (DSS), expert systems, executive information systems, group DSS (GDSS), group support systems (GSS), collaborative systems (or computer-supported collaborative work (CSCW) environments), knowledge-based systems, and inquiring systems, all of which are described elsewhere in this encyclopedia. The progression of decision support system types that have emerged follows to some degree the increasing complexity of the problems being addressed. Some of the early DSS involved single decision-makers utilizing spreadsheet models to solve problems. Such an approach would be inadequate in addressing complex problems because one aspect of problem complexity is that multiple stakeholders typically exist. Baldwin (1993) examined the need for supporting multiple views and provides the only attempt found in the information systems literature to operationalize the concept of a perspective. In his work, a view is defined as a set of beliefs that partially describe a general subject of discourse. He identified three major components of a view: the belief or notion to convey, a language to represent the notion, and a subject of discourse. He further described notions as comprising aspects and a vantage point. Aspects are the characteristics or attributes of a subject or situation that a particular notion emphasizes. A vantage point is described by the level of detail (i.e., overview or detailed analysis). Assuming the subject of discourse can be identified with the notion, Baldwin described how differences in views may occur via differences in the notion, the language, or both.


Respati ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helda Yunita

INTISARISistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) merupakan suatu sistem yang mendukung suatu instansi dalam pengambilan keputusan untuk suatu permasalahan dengan tujuan sebagai alat bantu untuk memperluas kapabilitas dalam pengambilan keputusan. Pendukung keputusan pada dasarnya merupakan suatu hasil dari beberapa alternatif terbaik yang terpilih sesuai dengan berbagai macam kriteria. Salah satu metode sistem pendukung keputusan yaitu metode Analyitical Hierarchy Process (AHP) yang merupakan metode untuk melakukan pengambilan keputusan secara ilmiah dan rasional untuk memberikan solusi terhadap masalah kriteria yang kompleks dalam berbagai alternative dengan melakukan perhitungan dari perbandingan permasing – masing kriteria. Melalui metode AHP ini dapat diketahui hasil dari nilai para calon asisten laboratorium yang telah dihitung sesuai dengan kriterianya.Kata kunci—Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), seleksi calon asisten laboratorium.ABSTRACTDecision support systems ( DSS ) is a system that supports an agency in decision-making to a problem with the destination as a tool to expand the decision making capabilities. Basicly, a decision support systems is a selection of some of the best alternative options from some criteria. A method of decision support systems is Analyitical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) is a method to make decisions scientifically and rationally to provide solutions to complex problems in a variety of criteria alternatives. With this Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) method can be show the result from values of laboratory assistant candidate that calculate from their criteria.Keywords—Decision Support Systems (DSS), analytical hierarchy process (AHP), candidate laboratory assistant selection


1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. T. de Dombal

AbstractThis paper deals with a major difficulty and potential limiting factor in present-day decision support - that of assigning precise value to an item (or group of items) of clinical information. Historical determinist descriptive thinking has been challenged by current concepts of uncertainty and probability, but neither view is adequate. Four equations are proposed outlining factors which affect the value of clinical information, which explain some previously puzzling observations concerning decision support. It is suggested that without accommodation of these concepts, computer-aided decision support cannot progress further, but if they can be accommodated in future programs, the implications may be profound.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document