Family History of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Risk Between Malays Ethnicity in Malaysia and Indonesia: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women not only in world but also in Malays ethnicity between Malaysia and Indonesia. Breast cancer has varying incidence in every country, but genetic factor by family history influence the incidence of breast cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine family history of breast cancer and breast cancer risk between Malays ethnicity in Malaysia and Indonesia. Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted on published research articles on family history of breast cancer and breast cancer risk between Malays ethnicity in Malaysia and Indonesia published between Jan 1999 and Jul 2018 in the online article databases of PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated with fixed and random-effect models. Publication bias was visually evaluated by using funnel plots and statistically assessed through Egger’s and Begg’s tests. Data were processed using Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3) and Stata version 14.2 (Stata Corporation). Conclusion: This analysis confirmed the association of family history of breast cancer and breast cancer risk between Malays ethnicity in Malaysia and Indonesia.

Download Full-text

Evaluating the Effect of Health Education Intervention on the Health Beliefs and Behaviors of First-Degree Female Relatives of Breast Cancer Patients

South Asian Journal of Cancer ◽

10.1055/s-0041-1733318 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Sule Olgun ◽

Berna Dizer

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Family History ◽

Health Education ◽

Breast Cancer Risk ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Health Beliefs ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

History Of ◽

And Behaviors

Abstract Background Breast cancer risk increases by 80% in the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in the same family. In particular, a woman whose sister or mother has breast cancer has a 2- to 5-fold higher risk of developing breast cancer compared with other women. For this reason, recommendations should have been made regarding breast cancer prevention and/or early detection for women with first-degree family history of breast cancer. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of health education, which was provided to first-degree female relatives of breast cancer patients, on their health beliefs and behaviors. Study Design and Methods The study sample included 50 women with a first-degree relative being treated for breast cancer in the chemotherapy and radiotherapy unit of a university hospital. A one-group pretest-posttest design was used. The pretest consisted of the health belief model scale and a questionnaire regarding the women’s sociodemographic information and breast cancer screening behaviors. After the pretest, the patients received health education regarding breast cancer risk factors and screening methods. The posttest was conducted 3 weeks after the education using the same assessment tools. Results After education, there were statistically significant increases in rates of practicing breast self-examination, having clinical breast examinations, and undergoing breast ultrasound/mammography compared with pretest results. Conclusions Health workers should possess knowledge and experience about breast cancer which will enable them to effectively undertake an educational role, especially for high-risk groups such as women with first-degree family history of breast cancer.

Download Full-text

First-degree family history of breast cancer is associated with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-019-6055-9 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Zheng-Ju Ren ◽

De-Hong Cao ◽

Qin Zhang ◽

Peng-Wei Ren ◽

Liang-Ren Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Family History ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Prostate Cancer Risk ◽

History Of

Download Full-text

The Steroid Metabolome and Breast Cancer Risk in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: The Novel Role of Adrenal Androgens and Glucocorticoids

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention ◽

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0471 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Lauren C. Houghton ◽

Renata E. Howland ◽

Ying Wei ◽

Xinran Ma ◽

Rebecca D. Kehm ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Family History ◽

Breast Cancer Risk ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

The Novel ◽

Adrenal Androgens ◽

History Of

Download Full-text

Linoleic acid and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Public Health Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s136898001500289x ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 19 (8) ◽

pp. 1457-1463 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Yunping Zhou ◽

Tao Wang ◽

Shenyong Zhai ◽

Wei Li ◽

Qiang Meng

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Linoleic Acid ◽

Breast Cancer Risk ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Acid Intake ◽

Linoleic Acid Intake ◽

Study Heterogeneity

AbstractObjectivePrior studies on linoleic acid, the predominant n-6 fatty acid, and breast cancer risk have generated inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the relationship of dietary and serum linoleic acid with breast cancer risk.DesignPertinent studies were identified by a search of PubMed and EMBASE. The fixed- or random-effect pooled measure was selected based on between-study heterogeneity.ResultsEight prospective cohort studies and four prospective nested case–control studies, involving 10 410 breast cancer events from 358 955 adult females across different countries, were included in present study. Compared with the lowest level of linoleic acid, the pooled relative risk (RR; 95 % CI) of breast cancer was 0·98 (0·93, 1·04) for the highest level of linoleic acid. The pooled RR (95 % CI) for dietary and serum linoleic acid were 0·99 (0·92, 1·06) and 0·98 (0·88, 1·08), respectively. The RR (95 % CI) of breast cancer was 0·97 (0·91, 1·04), 0·95 (0·85, 1·07), 0·96 (0·86, 1·07), 0·98 (0·87, 1·10) and 0·99 (0·85, 1·14) for linoleic acid intake of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 g/d, respectively. The risk of breast cancer decreased by 1 % (RR=0·99; 95 % CI 0·93, 1·05) for every 10 g/d increment in linoleic acid intake.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis indicated that both dietary linoleic acid intake and serum linoleic acid level were associated with decreased risk of breast cancer, although none of the associations were statistically significant. Further investigations are warranted.

Download Full-text

Breast Cancer Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Update Meta-Analysis

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2014/453012 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 2014 ◽

pp. 1-9 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Guo Tian ◽

Jia-Ning Liang ◽

Zhuo-Yun Wang ◽

Dian Zhou

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Breast Cancer Risk ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

The Impact

Background. The incidence of breast cancer in RA patients remains controversial. Thus we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of RA on breast cancer.Methods. Published literature was available from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Pooled standardized incidence rate (SIR) was computed by random-effect model analysis.Results. We identified 16 separate studies in the present study, in which the number of patients ranged from 458 to 84,475. We did not find the increased cancer risk in RA patients (SIR=0.86, 95%CI=0.72–1.02). However, subgroup analysis showed that breast cancer risk in RA patients was positively different in Caucasians (SIR=0.82, 95%CI=0.73–0.93) and non-Caucasians (SIR=1.21, 95%CI=1.19–1.23), respectively. In subgroup analysis by style, a reduced incidence was found in hospital-based case subjects (SIR=0.82, 95%CI=0.69–0.97). Similarly, subgroup analysis for adjusted factors indicated that in A3 (age and sex) and A4 (age, sex, and race/ethnicity) the risk was decreased (SIR=0.87, 95%CI=0.76–0.99;SIR=0.63, 95%CI=0.59–0.67).Conclusions. The meta-analysis revealed no increased breast cancer risk in RA patients. However, in the subgroup analysis, the risk of breast cancer is increased in non-Caucasians patients with RA while it decreased in Caucasian population, hospital-based case subjects, and A3 group. Such relationship may provide preference for risk of breast cancer in different population.

Download Full-text