scholarly journals Effect of Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery on Central Macular Thickness in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Subjects

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brahm Prakash Guliani ◽  
Isha Agarwal ◽  
Mayuresh P. Naik
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: To assess the quantitative changes of macula in diabetic and non-diabetic eyes after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Methods: In this prospective interventional study being performed in a tertiary healthcare hospital, a total of 660 eyes were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 330 eyes from healthy subjects and group 2 included 330 eyes from well-controlled diabetic subjects with no diabetic retinopathy planned for phacoemulsification with foldable IOL implantation by the same surgeon under similar settings. Optical Coherence Tomography (Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT) was used to assess preoperative and postoperative central macular thickness (CMT) at weeks 1 and 6. Results: The mean CMT in group 1 preoperatively, at postoperative week 1, and at post-operative week 6 was 257.03 ± 20.904, 262.82 ± 17.010, and 265.15 ± 20.078 μm, respectively. The corresponding values in group 2 were 255.36 ± 17.852, 259.15 ± 16.644, and 266.09 ± 18.844 μm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean CMT values between the two groups on any of the three occasions when the CMT was measured (P = 0.374 and P = 0.313 at weeks 1 and 6, respectively). Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in CMT between normal subjects and diabetic subjects without diabetic retinopathy preoperatively and in early postoperative period after uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery.

scholarly journals CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS AFTER COMBINED THERAPY OF BEVACIZUMAB INTRAVITREAL INJECTION AND TOPICAL DICLOFENAC COMPARED WITH BEVACIZUMAB INTRAVITREAL INJECTION ALONE IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Melvina Nidya Sandra ◽  
Yumni Shabrina ◽  
Tri Wahyu Widayanti ◽  
Retno Ekantini ◽  
Agus Supartoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injection ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: To evaluate whether the combination of diclofenac eye drops and bevacizumab intravitreal injection would provide additional benefits over bevacizumab alone in the treatment of naïve diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: A total of 43 patients were enrolled consecutively and randomized into two groups to receive combination treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab and topical diclofenac (group 1) or bevacizumab alone (group 2). Group 1 patients received single bevacizumab intravitreal injection and got self-administered diclofenac eye drop four times daily for one month. Group 2 patients received single bevacizumab intravitreal injection alone. Outcome data were obtained from patient visits at baseline and at 1 month after bevacizumab intravitreal injection. All patients underwent measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), a complete eye examination, and measurement of central macular thickness (CMT). Result: The mean reduction in CMT in the combination group was 130.42±32.57 µm (p<0.01), while in the bevacizumab alone group the reduction was 141.38±45.27 µm (p<0.01), there is no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.866). The mean improvement of BCVA was 0.32±0.10 log Mar in the combination group and 0.26±0.12 in group 2, there is no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.691). There was no adverse ocular event in the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with naïve DME, adding diclofenac eye drop as adjuvant of bevacizumab intravitreal injection are less likely to have a meaningful effect on reducing the central macular thickness. Keywords: Diabetic macular edema, NSAID, diclofenac, anti-VEGF, bevacizumab, central macular thickness

scholarly journals Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-178
Author(s):  
Anu Malik ◽  
Smruti Ranjan Dethi ◽  
Yogesh Kumar Gupta ◽  
Alka Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Surgically Induced ◽  
Group 1

Aim: To compare surgical parameters and visual outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery (MICS) with standard phacoemulsification. Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted on 60 eyes of 60 patients with age-related uncomplicated cataract who underwent: standard phacoemulsification surgery (30 eyes) i.e., Group 1, or coaxial MICS (30 eyes) i.e., Group 2. Intraoperative parameters were mean effective phacoemulsification power (EPP), effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), and total volume of balanced salt solution (BSS) used. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Results: Mean BCVA at 6 weeks was 0.04 ± 0.07 in Group 1 and 0.05 ± 0.08 in Group 2. No significant difference was observed in SIA between the two groups. Mean EPT was 29.80 ± 3.67 seconds in Group 1 and 31.93 ± 4.08 seconds in Group 2. The mean total EPP in Group 1 was 35.77 ± 5.17%, whereas it was 33.70 ± 3.05% in Group 2. There was a significant statistical difference between mean EPP and EPT in the two groups. Mean total BSS volume used in Group 1 was 128.83 ± 19.81 ml, whereas it was 139.33 ± 13.57 ml in Group 2. Conclusion: Although EPT and BSS volume used were significantly higher in coaxial MICS, the postoperative results of the two techniques were comparable.

scholarly journals CHOROIDAL THICKNESS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-37
Author(s):  
Amash Aqil ◽  
Muhammad Moin ◽  
Khadijah Abid ◽  
Ahsan Mehmood
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Choroidal Thickness ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Department Of Ophthalmology ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Objective: To evaluate central macular thickness and choroidal thickness in patients with macular edema due to diabetic retinopathy versus controls. Study Design: Cross-sectional comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ophthalmology, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, from Jan to Jul 2018. Methodology: A retrospective data of 100 eyes from 50 patients having with diabetic macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy was extracted from hospital registry. Additionally, 100 eyes of 50 individuals without any preexisting ocular conditions, comprising a control group was included in the study. Choroidal thickness measurements were made from the posterior edge of the retinal pigment epithelium to the choroid/sclera junction at subfoveal level using optical coherence tomography. Central macular thickness was also measured for all the enrolled patients. Results: One hundred patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our study. The mean age was 56.27 ± 14.41 years. The mean Central macular thickness of all the patients were reported as 270.49 ± 72.38 μm, while the choroidal thickness was 284.89 ± 96.51 μm. There was statistically significant difference in central macular thickness between both healthy and diabetic retinopathy with diabetic macular edema groups (p=0.001), whereas insignificant difference existed between the two groups forchoroidal thickness (p=0.735). Conclusion: In patients with diabetic macular edema no significant change in choroidal thickness was observed compared with healthy controls, while the thickness of the retina was high in patients with macular edema due to diabetes.

scholarly journals ‘Comparison of Safety and Performance of Two Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Cataract Surgery’

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
öznur işcan ◽  
Banu Torun Acar ◽  
Burcu Nurozler Tarakcı
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cell ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Corneal Thickness ◽  
Anterior Chamber Depth ◽  
Sodium Hyaluronate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Purpose: To compare the safety and performance of two ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) Bio-Hyalur SV (Sodium Hyaluronate 3.0%) (Biotech Healthcare Group, Luzern, Switzerland) and Protectalon (sodium hyaluronate 2.0%) (VSY Biotechnology, Turkey) in cataract surgery. Methods: One hundred twenty eyes of one hundred twenty patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery were included in the study. Postoperatively sixty eyes using Bio-Hyalur-SV were classified as Group 1, and sixty eyes using Protectalon as Group 2. Patients aged 45 and over, Grade I, II or III unilateral / double stained cataract, healthy eyes creating cataract inclueded in this study . Endothelial cell morphological parameters including endothelial cell density (ECD), cell number, cell area, coefficient of variation (CV) in cell size, cell hexagonality and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured preoperatively and at postoperative first week, first and third month visits.Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with an applanation tonometer at every visit. Results: . There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean ECD all follow-up times when compared with the preoperative visit (p=0.000). In terms of mean ECD levels there was no significant difference between the two groups within three months postoperatively (p=0.616) In the first week after surgery, there was an significant increase in CCT in Group 1 and Group 2 respectively (p=0.000). The IOP was <23 mmHg in all of the patients on the first day after surgery. There was no significant difference in the incidence of IOP peaks between the two groups in every vizits. In both groups, a significant increase was observed in the mean IOP at first day, first week, and first month after surgery compared to preoperative values (p=0.000). But no significant difference in IOP increase in Group 1 (P=0.092), Group 2 (P=0.013) compared to preoperative values ​​at third month postoperatively (p <0.001 significant with Bonferrotti correction). Conclusion: The two OVD’s used in this study during cataract surgery were safe and effective. Both OVD’s resulted in similar rates of transient IOP increases and corneal endothelial damage also provided good anterior chamber depth and were fairly easy to remove.

scholarly journals CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS AFTER CATARACT SURGERY IN NON-DIABETICS AND DIABETICS WITHOUT RETINOPATHY

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1993-96
Author(s):  
Marrium Shafi ◽  
Muhammad Akmal Khan ◽  
Yaseen Lodhi ◽  
Asma Aftab ◽  
Muhammad Haroon Sarfraz
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Thickness Measurement ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
P Value ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean

Objective: To determine the mean change in central macular thickness after cataract surgery and to compare the mean change in central macular thickness after cataract surgery in non-diabetics and diabetics without diabetic retinopathy Study design: Case control   Study settings and duration: A case control study was carried out at Ophthalmology department, POF hospital, Wah Cantt. Study duration was 6 months (April 2019-September 2019)   Material and methods: A sample size of 60 patients was calculated by using Open Epi Software. We used non probability consecutive sampling. Patients were divided into two groups; Cases (Diabetic) and controls (non-Diabetic). All patients underwent phacoemulsification and observed after 4 weeks for macular thickness measurement using optical coherence tomography before and after surgery. Data analysis was done with SPSS version 20. Post stratification t test was applied. P value ≤0.05 was considered significant.   Results: Total 60 patients were included. Mean age of patients was 65.31 ±7. 63SD.There were 35 (58.3%) males and 25 (41.7%) female patients in the study. We found a significant increase in central macular thickness in cases and controls [(223.100±15.86SD vs 227.2667±17.9SD, p=0.000) and (221.200±12.16SD vs 226.289±16.7861SD, p =0.001)] before and after phacoemulsification in cases and controls respectively. However, no significant difference was found between the groups (p=0.486).   Conclusion: Central macular thickness was increased after uncomplicated phacoemulsification in both diabetics and non-diabetics without retinopathy for up to a follow-up period of 4 weeks but the thickness did not differ between the two groups.

scholarly journals Long-term Analysis of Surgically Induced Astigmatism after Combined Vitrectomy and Cataract Surgery versus Cataract Surgery Alone

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035
Author(s):  
Zee Yoon Byun ◽  
Jung Hyun Lee ◽  
Sang-Mok Lee ◽  
Daniel Duck-Jin Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induced Astigmatism ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
23 Gauge ◽  
Surgically Induced ◽  
Sutureless Vitrectomy ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: To compare the long-term changes in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) in patients who underwent 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy and cataract surgery together with patients who underwent cataract surgery only.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed SIA changes for 1 year after surgery in patients who received only cataract surgery using phacoemulsification (group 1) and patients who underwent 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy and cataract surgery together (group 2). Flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), and astigmatism axis were measured with automatic keratometry before and after the surgery. Vector analysis was used to calculate SIA at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. We then examined whether the SIA values at each time point were different between the two groups.Results: A total of 86 eyes were included in this study (group 1, n = 45; group 2, n = 41). The mean SIA values calculated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery in group 1 were 0.83 ± 0.37, 0.69 ± 0.39, 0.60 ± 0.33, and 0.59 ± 0.33, respectively. In group 2, the values were 0.82 ± 0.47, 0.69 ± 0.38, 0.62 ± 0.28, and 0.61 ± 0.30, respectively. Over time, SIA decreased in both groups (all p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean SIA between the two groups at each follow-up time point after surgery (p = 0.296, p = 0.728, p = 0.361, and p = 0.356, respectively).Conclusions: When 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy and cataract surgery were performed together, the astigmatism change caused by surgery did not show a significant difference compared with that of the group who received cataract surgery only. Thus, 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy may not significantly affect corneal astigmatism.

scholarly journals Intraocular Pressure Changes during Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Comparison between Two Different Patient Interfaces

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara De Giacinto ◽  
Rossella D’Aloisio ◽  
Alessandro Bova ◽  
Tommaso Candian ◽  
Alberto Armando Perrotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Soft Contact ◽  
Soft Contact Lens ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Pressure Changes ◽  
Group 1

Purpose. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) changes during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using two different patient interface systems. Methods. 116 eyes of 116 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (61 eyes) and group 2 (55 eyes) underwent FLACS using Catalys Laser with fluid interface (liquid optics interface, LOI) and LenSx Laser with curved interface and soft contact lens (SoftFit), respectively. IOP was assessed using a portable rebound tonometer (Icare®) preoperatively, after docking, immediately after surgery, at one and seven days postoperatively. Results. In group 1, the mean IOP (±SD) was 14.1 ± 0.4 mmHg before surgery, 33.2 ± 1.1 mmHg after docking, and 21.4 ± 0.9 mmHg immediately after surgery. In group 2, the mean IOP was 13.8 ± 0.4 mmHg before surgery, 24.2 ± 1.4 mmHg after docking, and 20.2 ± 1.2 mmHg immediately after surgery. After the docking procedure, a statistically significant increase in IOP from the baseline was found in both groups (p<0.001). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in IOP measured at 1 and 7 days postoperatively was observed compared with the preoperative values (p>0.05) using both laser platforms. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed. Conclusions. FLACS suction phase resulted in a transient increase of IOP in both groups, especially with the LOI system, and it is probably related to the greater pressure of a suction ring and suction generated through the vacuum, independently from the effect of femtosecond laser itself.

Effect of capsular tension ring on refractive results in cases with pseudoexfoliation syndrome

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212096546
Author(s):  
Nilay Kandemir Besek ◽  
Gulsah Gumus ◽  
Gamze Ozturk Karabulut ◽  
Senay Asik Nacaroglu ◽  
Ahmet Kirgiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Refractive Error ◽  
Capsular Tension Ring ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hyperopic Shift ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Lens Power ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: To investigate the effect of capsular tension rings (CTRs) on postoperative refractive results in patients with pseudoexfoliation (PSX) syndrome. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine patients with PSX syndrome who had uncomplicated cataract surgery between March 2016 and February 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups. The 35 patients in Group 1 received CTRs prior to intraocular lens implantation during cataract surgery, and the 34 patients in Group 2 had cataract surgery without CTRs. Significant zonular weakness, uncontrolled glaucoma, and ocular pathologies causing low visual acuity were excluded. The preoperative and postoperative keratometry and autorefraction measurements, preoperative expected refractive values, and absolute refractive error were recorded. Results: The mean ages of patients were 73.54 ± 9.78 years in Group 1 and 72.23 ± 6.72 years in Group 2 ( p = 0.521). There was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of expected preoperative refraction values (–0.52 ± 0.12,–0.56 ± 0.08, respectively, p = 0.118). There was a statistically significant difference in postoperative spherical equivalent values between Group 1 and Group 2 (–0.05 ± 0.97 and −0.92 ± 0.57, respectively, p < 0.01). A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of absolute refractive error (0.46 ± 0.74 in Group 1 and −0.34 ± 0.59 in Group 2 p < 0.01). Conclusion: CTR implantation causes hyperopic shift, which should be taken into consideration when calculating the lens power of intraocular lens in patients with PSX syndrome.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MACULAR THICKNESS AFTER PHACOEMULSIFICATION VERSUS MANUAL SICS IN DIABETIC PATIENTS BY OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamta Singh ◽  
Bibhuti Prassan Sinha
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Spss Software ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to compare the macular thickness after uncomplicated Phacoemulsification versus manual SICS in known diabetic patient by OCT. Methods: This study was prospective observational study involving 50 eyes of 50 patients with each arm having 25 patients.  Group 1 was operated with Phacoemulsification with foldable IOL through 2.2 mm incision & group 2 were operated with manual SICS through 5.5 to 6.5 mm incision with PMMA IOL implantation. Macular OCT was performed in all patients during preoperative period & day 7 post op, 1st month, 3rd month & 6th month. The data were analyzed by using SPSS software (version22.0 SPSS Inc). Results: The MCFT rose steadily in both group during post operative period with higher rise noted in SICS group throughout follow up. Significant difference in MCFT between Phaco & SICS group were noted with highest MCFT noted in 1st month follow up in both groups i.e.  231.6 micro m (SD+7.831) in Phaco group & 241.08 (SD+7.35) in SICS group. The MCFT returned to near pre OP value by 6th month. Conclusion: 1 Age & Sex has no effect on macular thickness before and after any type of Cataract surgery be it Phaco or SICS. 2 Significant higher macular thickness was observed in SICS group so       caution should be taken in SICS patients. Keywords: Phacoemulsification, small incision cataract surgery (SICS), Cystoid macular edema

scholarly journals Repair Integrity and Functional Outcomes Between Knot-Tying and Knotless Suture-Bridge Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712110024
Author(s):  
Koray Şahin ◽  
Fatih Şentürk ◽  
Mehmet Ersin ◽  
Ufuk Arzu ◽  
Mechmet Chodza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Knot Tying ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Group 1

Background: Knot-tying suture-bridge (SB) rotator cuff repair may compromise the vascularity of the repaired tendon, causing tendon strangulation and medial repair failure. The knotless SB repair technique has been proposed to overcome this possibility and decrease retear rates. Purpose: To compare clinical and structural outcomes and retear patterns between the knot-tying and knotless SB techniques. We hypothesized that the knotless technique would result in lower retear rates owing to the preservation of intratendinous vascularity. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 104 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were randomly and prospectively allocated to undergo knot-tying (group 1) or knotless (group 2) SB repair. Clinical outcome measures included range of motion, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the Constant score for function. Repair integrity was evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging scans using the Sugaya classification. Retears were also classified according to their pattern as type 1 (lateral) or type 2 (medial). Results: Overall, 88 patients (group 1: n = 42 [mean ± SD age, 54.3 ± 9.8 years]; group 2: n = 46 [mean ± SD age, 55.8 ± 8.2 years]) were included in the final analysis. The mean ± SD follow-up period was 25.4 ± 8.3 and 23.3 ± 7.2 months for groups 1 and 2, respectively. From preoperatively to postoperatively, the mean VAS pain score improved significantly in both groups (group 1: from 7.4 ± 1.7 to 1.0 ± 1.7; group 2: from 7.1 ± 1.9 to 1.3 ± 2.0; P < .0001 for both), as did the mean ± SD Constant score (group 1: from 51.7 ± 13.4 to 86.0 ± 11.5; group 2: from 49.4 ± 18.4 to 87.2 ± 14.8; P < .0001 for both). There was no significant difference between the groups for the postoperative VAS or Constant score. The retear rate was not significantly different between the groups (19.0% [8/42] in group 1 and 28.3% [13/46] in group 2; P > .05). There was a significant difference in the type 2 failure rate (75.0% [6/8] in group 1 and 23.1% [3/13] in group 2; P = .03). Conclusion: Both techniques showed excellent improvement and comparable clinical outcomes, and there was no significant difference in retear rates. Consistent with previously published data, the type 2 failure rate was significantly higher with the knot-tying technique. Registration: NCT03982108 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document