To study the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming in first trimester MTP

Background: MTP Act no 34 of 1971 has been defined as Legal termination of pregnancy before the age of viability of fetus that is 20 weeks of gestation. There is a need to find a medical agent which can help in the process of abortion by speeding it up, with minimal side effects. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of I.M carboprost and intravaginal Misoprostol and to evaluate the safety profile of I.M carboprost and Intravaginal Misoprostol. To compare the cervical dilatation caused by I.M carboprost and intravaginal Misoprostol and to compare the blood loss and adverse effects of I.M carboprost and Intravaginal Misoprostol.Methods: Prospective randomized experimental study including pregnant women up to 12 weeks of gestation opting for M.T.P. Study conducted on 200 patients selected from patients admitted in MGM Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore and Kalyanmal Hospital, Indore during the period July 2014 to March 2015. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A who received intramuscular injection of 250 mcg of caboprost or Group B,which received 400 mcg of vaginal Misoprostol 4 hours prior to suction evacuation.Results: Intravaginal misoprostol achieves better cervical dilatation compared I.M carboprost which is statistically significant. Misoprostol is associated with higher blood loss as compared to I.M carboprost which is associated with nausea/vomiting & more likelihood of loose stools and abdominal cramps which is proved statistically.Conclusions: Intravaginal misoprostol is associated with higher blood loss as compared to I.M carboprost which is significant but intravaginal misoprostol achieves more cervical dilatation and causes less adverse events than I.M carboprost which is statistically more significant and therefore intravaginal misoprostol is the drug of choice for cervical priming prior to surgical abortion in terms of both efficacy and safety.

Download Full-text

Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming in first-trimester abortion: a randomized trial

The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care ◽

10.1080/ejc.6.3.134.140 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 6 (3) ◽

pp. 134-140 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

J. L. Carbonell ◽

A. Velazco ◽

Y. Rodriguez ◽

R. Tanda ◽

C. Sánchez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomized Trial ◽

First Trimester ◽

Trimester Abortion ◽

Cervical Priming ◽

Vaginal Misoprostol

Download Full-text

MISSED ABORTION

The Professional Medical Journal ◽

10.29309/tpmj/2010.17.02.2433 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 17 (02) ◽

pp. 295-299

Author(s):

IKRAMULLAH KHAN ◽

IK TIAR ◽

NOREEN SHEZADI

Keyword(s):

Side Effects ◽

First Trimester ◽

Cervical Dilatation ◽

Systemic Effects ◽

Lower Abdomen ◽

Cervical Priming ◽

Group A ◽

Systemic Side Effects ◽

Vaginal Misoprostol ◽

Group B

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of extra-amniotic cervical catheter and vaginal misoprostol as a cervical priming agent prior to surgical evacuation in first trimester missed abortions. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: At lady Willingdon hospital gynecology unit 1 from 1st March 2008 to 28th February 2009. Methods: 100 patients with diagnosis of missed abortions of up to 12 weeks + 6 days were studied. The primigravida were included. They were divided in two groups. In group. A (50) patients 400 microgram (2 tablet ) misoprostol were placed high up in posterior vaginal fornix while in group B (50) patients extra-amniotic. Foleys catheter was placed aseptically 6 hour before surgical intervention as priming agent. Exclusion criteria: All multigravida, patients sensitive to prostaglandin, and with disturbed coagulation were excluded. Main Outcome Measures: The main out comes are 1, cervical dilatation and effacement 2,complications like fever, pain lower abdomen, headache and vomiting 3, amount of bleeding in ml after application of agent. Results: Cervical catheter proved to be good cervical priming agent comparable to misoprostol. Cervical dilatation was significantly better in misoprostol (> 10 mm 44%, > 8mm 30%, > 5mm 20%) as compared to Foleys group (>10 mm 24%, > 8mm 38%, > 5mm 20%) while in 3 (6%) dose of misoprostol was repeated and in 10 (20%) patient in Foleys group has no effect. The side effects occurred in both groups but systemic effects were more in misoprostol, pain lower abdomen 42% VS 46%, backache 18% VS 26%, fever 10% VS nil, headache 16% VS nil and no side effect 14% VS28%) as compared to Foleys catheter. Systemic effects were absent in Foleys catheter due to inert nature. Bleeding occurred in all patientswith misoprostol while it was absent in 48% cases in Foleys group (>60ml 42% VS 8%, <40ml 32% VS 14% < 20ml 26% VS 30%). 48% cases had no bleeding in Foleys group. Conclusion: Cervical catheter proved to be good priming agent due to lesser systemic side effects as compared to misoprostol.

Download Full-text