scholarly journals MISSED ABORTION

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 295-299
Author(s):  
IKRAMULLAH KHAN ◽  
IK TIAR ◽  
NOREEN SHEZADI
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Cervical Dilatation ◽  
Systemic Effects ◽  
Lower Abdomen ◽  
Cervical Priming ◽  
Group A ◽  
Systemic Side Effects ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of extra-amniotic cervical catheter and vaginal misoprostol as a cervical priming agent prior to surgical evacuation in first trimester missed abortions. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: At lady Willingdon hospital gynecology unit 1 from 1st March 2008 to 28th February 2009. Methods: 100 patients with diagnosis of missed abortions of up to 12 weeks + 6 days were studied. The primigravida were included. They were divided in two groups. In group. A (50) patients 400 microgram (2 tablet ) misoprostol were placed high up in posterior vaginal fornix while in group B (50) patients extra-amniotic. Foleys catheter was placed aseptically 6 hour before surgical intervention as priming agent. Exclusion criteria: All multigravida, patients sensitive to prostaglandin, and with disturbed coagulation were excluded. Main Outcome Measures: The main out comes are 1, cervical dilatation and effacement 2,complications like fever, pain lower abdomen, headache and vomiting 3, amount of bleeding in ml after application of agent. Results: Cervical catheter proved to be good cervical priming agent comparable to misoprostol. Cervical dilatation was significantly better in misoprostol (> 10 mm 44%, > 8mm 30%, > 5mm 20%) as compared to Foleys group (>10 mm 24%, > 8mm 38%, > 5mm 20%) while in 3 (6%) dose of misoprostol was repeated and in 10 (20%) patient in Foleys group has no effect. The side effects occurred in both groups but systemic effects were more in misoprostol, pain lower abdomen 42% VS 46%, backache 18% VS 26%, fever 10% VS nil, headache 16% VS nil and no side effect 14% VS28%) as compared to Foleys catheter. Systemic effects were absent in Foleys catheter due to inert nature. Bleeding occurred in all patientswith misoprostol while it was absent in 48% cases in Foleys group (>60ml 42% VS 8%, <40ml 32% VS 14% < 20ml 26% VS 30%). 48% cases had no bleeding in Foleys group. Conclusion: Cervical catheter proved to be good priming agent due to lesser systemic side effects as compared to misoprostol.

scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy of buccal versus vaginal misoprostol in first trimester induced abortion

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3368
Author(s):  
Nida Khan ◽  
Anita M. Kant ◽  
Pooja C. Thukral ◽  
Mohammad Saquib
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Vaginal Route ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: To compare the effectiveness, side effects, and patient satisfaction of buccal versus vaginal misoprostol administration in first trimester abortions.Methods: Women opting for first trimester abortion received oral Mifepristone followed 48 hours latermisoprostol. Group A received Misoprostol via buccal route whereas group B received Misoprostol vaginally. A comparative analysis using SPSS was done.Results: Giving 800µg Misoprostol by either buccal or vaginal route after oral Mifepristone have comparable efficacy in terms of complete abortion rate (96% in buccal group versus 98% in vaginal group; p value = 0.495), failure rate being statistically similar (4% versus 2%). Drug abortion interval was comparable in the two groups. (11.16 hour in buccal group and 12.32 hours in vaginal group). Few side effects like nausea and vomiting, shivering, diarrohea was significantly higher with vaginal Misoprostol while abdominal cramps, altered taste were found more with the buccal group.Conclusions: Buccal Misoprostol is comfortable and easier to administer when compared to other routes and it has potential to be developed as a self-administered regimen. Buccal Misoprostol is as efficacious as vaginal Misoprostol with significantly lesser side effects up to 7 weeks of period of gestation.

scholarly journals A comparative study of efficacy and safety of intramuscular carboprost and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical priming prior to first trimester surgical abortion

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4553
Author(s):  
Gayatri Mathuriya ◽  
Neha Verma ◽  
Shivangi Pandey
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Cervical Dilatation ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Cervical Priming ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B ◽  
Surgical Abortion

Background: MTP Act no 34 of 1971 has been defined as Legal termination of pregnancy before the age of viability of fetus that is 20 weeks of gestation. There is a need to find a medical agent which can help in the process of abortion by speeding it up, with minimal side effects. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of I.M carboprost and intravaginal Misoprostol and to evaluate the safety profile of I.M carboprost and Intravaginal Misoprostol. To compare the cervical dilatation caused by I.M carboprost and intravaginal Misoprostol and to compare the blood loss and adverse effects of I.M carboprost and Intravaginal Misoprostol.Methods: Prospective randomized experimental study including pregnant women up to 12 weeks of gestation opting for M.T.P. Study conducted on 200 patients selected from patients admitted in MGM Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore and Kalyanmal Hospital, Indore during the period July 2014 to March 2015. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A who received intramuscular injection of 250 mcg of caboprost or Group B,which received 400 mcg of vaginal Misoprostol 4 hours prior to suction evacuation.Results: Intravaginal misoprostol achieves better cervical dilatation compared I.M carboprost which is statistically significant. Misoprostol is associated with higher blood loss as compared to I.M carboprost which is associated with nausea/vomiting & more likelihood of loose stools and abdominal cramps which is proved statistically.Conclusions: Intravaginal misoprostol is associated with higher blood loss as compared to I.M carboprost which is significant but intravaginal misoprostol achieves more cervical dilatation and causes less adverse events than I.M carboprost which is statistically more significant and therefore intravaginal misoprostol is the drug of choice for cervical priming prior to surgical abortion in terms of both efficacy and safety.

scholarly journals A COMPARITIVE STUDY BETWEEN EPIDURAL BUTORPHANOL, NALBUPHINE AND FENTANYL FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Swarna Banerjee ◽  
Shaswat Kumar Pattnaik
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Lower Abdomen ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Catheter Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Achieving satisfactory post-operative analgesia with neuraxial administration of narcotics has been the subject of much research. The use of epidural opioids had become an increasingly popular technique for management of acute post-operative pain in recent times. This study evaluates post-operative analgesic benefits in patients administered epidural butorphanol, nalbuphine, and fentanyl as adjuvants with local anesthetics postoperatively for surgery under epidural anesthesia.Methods: A total of 75 patients belonging to age groups 18-60 years who were scheduled for surgeries of lower abdomen were randomly divided into groups of 25 each. Epidural technique was adopted for surgery of the lower abdomen for all patients with 0.5% bupivacaine. In the post-operative period, the study drug was given through epidural catheter. Group A received butorphanol 2 mg, Group B received fentanyl 100 μg, and Group C received nalbuphine 10 mg with 0.125% bupivacaine diluted to 10 ml in normal saline each. Onset, duration, quality of analgesia, hemodynamic changes, and side effects – such as sedation, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, and urinary retention - were recorded and compared.Results: The demographic data were comparable in all three groups. The onset of sensory block was significantly earlier in Group B (fentanyl) than other two groups. Duration was significantly longer in Group A (butorphanol). No serious cardiorespiratory side effects were noted in any of groups.Conclusion: Fentanyl produces the faster onset of analgesia with adverse effects like pruritus. Butorphanol administered epidurally has the advantage of longer duration of analgesia than fentanyl or epidural nalbuphine with side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and sedation.Keywords: Epidural analgesia, Butorphanol, Fentanyl, Nalbuphine.

scholarly journals Time of interferon-β 1a injection and duration of treatment affect clinical side effects and acute changes of plasma hormone and cytokine levels in multiple sclerosis patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1138-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kümpfel ◽  
M. Schwan ◽  
Th. Pollmächer ◽  
A. Yassouridis ◽  
M. Uhr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Group A ◽  
Systemic Side Effects ◽  
Plasma Hormone ◽  
Group B ◽  
Acute Changes ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽  
Time Point

During initiation of interferon-beta (IFN-β) therapy, many multiple sclerosis (MS) patients experience systemic side effects which may depend on the time point of IFN-β injection. We investigated the time course of plasma hormone-, cytokine- and cytokine-receptor concentrations after the first injection of IFN-β either at 8.00 a.m. (group A) or at 6.00 p.m. (group B) and quantified clinical side effects within the first 9 h in 16 medication free patients with relapsing-remitting MS. This investigation was repeated after 6-month IFN-β therapy. Plasma ACTH and cortisol concentrations followed their physiological rhythms, with lower levels in the evening compared to the morning, but raised earlier and stronger in group B after IFN-β administration. IFN-β injection in the evening led to a prompter increase of plasma IL-6 concentrations and temperature during the first hours and correlated to more intense clinical side effects compared to group A. Plasma IL-10 concentrations increased more in group A compared to group B, but sTNF-RI and sTNF-RII concentrations raised 7 h after IFN-β injection only in group B. Acute effects on plasma hormone and cytokine concentrations adapted after 6-month IFN-β treatment, while diurnal variations were still present. Baseline sTNF-RII concentrations were elevated after 6-month IFN-β therapy only in group A. Our results show that time point of IFN-β injection has differential effects on acute changes of plasma hormone and cytokine concentrations and is related to systemic side effects. This may have implications on the tolerability and effectiveness of IFN-β therapy. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 1138—1145. http://msj.sagepub.com

scholarly journals Comparative study between sequential use of Foley catheter with vaginal misoprostol versus sequential use of oral mifepristone with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4545
Author(s):  
Michelle N. Fonseca ◽  
Vernica Sah
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Sequential Administration ◽  
Group A ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Abortions are one of the most commonly performed procedures in gynaecological departments worldwide. They are still a major problem in developing countries contributing to a significant percentage of maternal morbidity and mortality. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, side effects and acceptability of intracervical Foley and oral Mifepristone both followed with sequential administration of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion.Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial of 36 healthy women opting for termination of pregnancy with ultrasound confirmed intrauterine gestation between 12 to 20 completed weeks. Intracervical Foley catheter with administration of misoprostol (200µg) vaginally was done for Group A. Mifepristone 200mg was administered on day one followed by misoprostol (200µg) vaginally, 48 hours later, to Group B. Both groups received misoprostol (200µg) vaginally at 4 hourly intervals. Completeness of abortion was assessed, and surgical evacuation was performed, if abortion was found to be incomplete.Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, parity and gestational age. 83-89% of the women in both the groups had complete abortion. The mean induction abortion interval was 20.11 hours in Group A and 54.77 hours in Group B, which was statistically significant. Side effect profile was comparable in both groups however the intensity and the duration of persistence of pain was greater among patients from Group A.Conclusions: Authors conclude that medical abortions with both methods were found to be safe, effective, inexpensive and acceptable methods. Whereas a shorter induction abortion interval was observed in the Foley induction group, induction with mifepristone was the preferred regimen in second trimester abortion because of its high efficacy, low incidence of side effects, better tolerance by the patients and due to lower dose of misoprostol required following mifepristone administration.

scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy of Misoprostol 4 hourly with Misoprostol 6 hour for Medical termination of pregnancy in second trimester.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Shamas un Nisa ◽  
Farzana Razaq ◽  
Sadaf un Nisa
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Termination of Pregnancy (TOP), in our country is carried out only when considerable danger to a fetus due to congenital abnormalities, intrauterine fetal loss or when maternal life is under threat. The principle concerns in providing second trimester termination include safety, efficacy, simplicity, low-cost, and fast acting with minimal side effects. Objectives: To compare the efficacy in term of complete abortion within 48 hours between protocol-I (200 µg misoprostol 4 hourly) versus protocol-II (200 µg misoprostol 6 hourly) for second trimester (14-24 weeks) medical termination of pregnancy. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: Gynecology & obstetrics unit-II, Bahawal Victoria Hospital (BVH) Bahawalpur. Period: From 1st July 2017 to 30th June 2018. Material & Method: A total of 182 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in study. Ninety one patients were included in group-A and 91 patients were included in group-B.  Women allocated to group-A was given misoprostol 200µg every 4 hour. Similar drug and dose were administered to women of group-B intra-vaginally, 6 hourly. Patients in both groups were monitored up to 48. If abortion occurred within 48 hours of induction, it was labeled as effective abortion otherwise it was regarded as failed abortion. Results: The mean age in group-A was 26.71 years 25.49 years in Group-B. In group-A, 89 (97.8%) patients showed efficacy (abortion within 48 hours) and in group-B, 74 (81.32%) patients showed efficacy to misoprostol. Conclusion: The regimen of using 200μg of vaginal misoprostol 4 hourly is more efficacious and quick for 2nd trimester TOP with fewer side effects when compared to 200μg of vaginal misoprostol 6 hourly.

scholarly journals Randomized comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone priming in termination of second trimester pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3869
Author(s):  
Shrikrushna Vasant Chavan ◽  
Niraj Nilkanth Mahajan ◽  
Arundhati Gundu Tilve
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sublingual Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Sublingual Misoprostol 200 ug 4 hrly is as effective or less effective than vaginal Misoprostol 200ug 4hrly with 200mg oral Mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy.To compare effectiveness, side-effects, and patient satisfaction of sublingual vs vaginal misoprostol administration.Methods: It was prospective randomized open label study. 60 women 13-20 weeks of gestation with a valid legal indication for termination of pregnancy as per MTP act in INDIA were enrolled for study, randomly divided into Group A- Sublingual (n=30) group B-Vaginal (n=30). For group A, 200 mg of Mifepristone was given, 48h later Misoprostol 200 µg was given sublingually 4hrly up to a maximum of 5 doses. If abortion does not occur, the pregnancy was terminated with vaginal misoprostol, in group A. Same procedure repeated in group B. If abortion fails to occur after 5 doses, then second course of vaginal misoprostol was given in group B. Failure of procedure was defined as failed expulsion of foetus at 48 hrs. Results: Mean induction-abortion interval in vaginal group was 12.8±4.38h and 11.47±4.42h in sublingual group was comparable with insignificant p value (p=0.136). All the side effects were comparable in both groups. The overall success rate was 93.3% in the sublingual group while it was 100% in the vaginal group.Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol with oral mifepristone priming in second -trimester medical abortion has a shorter time to pregnancy termination compared with a sublingual regimen. However, both the routes are equally effective for induction of abortion.

scholarly journals Comparative study between intravaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic instillation of ethacridine lactacte for second trimester abortion

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2575
Author(s):  
Suryaprakash Jagdevappa Karande ◽  
Meena Shantanu Gunjotikar
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Ethacridine Lactate ◽  
Second Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Second Trimester Abortion ◽  
Group B

Background: The methods of terminating pregnancy in the first trimester are simple, safe and effective. Factors like lack of knowledge about availability of MTP services, ignorance, denial of pregnancy, fear of society may account for decrease in number of first trimester abortions. The aims of the present study were to compare the efficacy, induction abortion interval and side effects of intravaginal misoprostol with extra amniotic installation of ethacridine lactate for second trimester abortion.Methods: 60 women coming to MTP clinics requesting second trimester pregnancy termination between 12 to 20 weeks were selected. Detail history and examination was carried out in each patient. They divided into two groups, Group A (30) intravaginal misoprostol 400 initially followed by 400 micrograns every 6 hourly if required. Group B (30) extra-amniotic 0.1% ethacridine lactate 150 cc.Results: In Group A success rate was 100% while in Group B it was 76.66%, which is highly statistically significant (P< 0.01). Mean I – A interval in Group A was 14.58+5.25 hours was highly significantly less than in Group B, it was 33.91 + 3.97 hours (p<0.0001). In Group A complete abortion has occurred in 28 cases (93.33%) and in Group B in 12 cases (52.17%).Conclusions: We conclude that, as compared to extra-amniotic instillation of ethacridinelactate intravaginal misoprostol is the preferred regimen in second trimester abortion because of its high efficacy, shorter induction abortion interval, high incidence of completeness of abortion, low incidence of side effects and better tolerance by the patient. 

scholarly journals Randomized control trial to compare the effectiveness of mifepristone followed by misoprostol at 12 hours interval versus misoprostol alone in second trimester medical termination of pregnancy

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 3299
Author(s):  
Preet Kamal Bedi ◽  
Arunima Saini
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Cervical Dilatation ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Mifepristone priming in second trimester abortions not only decreases the induction-abortion interval (IAI) but also lessens the total misoprostol dose required and hence reduces adverse effects. The present study aims to compare the role of mifepristone priming 12 hours before misoprostol administration so as to increase patient compliance and shorten the duration of hospital stay.Methods: This prospective study was conducted over a period of one year, on 50 patients requiring second trimester abortion, at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Amritsar. The patients were divided into two groups with 1:1 randomization. In Group A, 25 women were given tablet mifepristone 200 mg orally followed 12 hours later by tablet misoprostol 400 µg per vaginum followed by the same dose 3 hourly for a maximum of five doses per 24 hours. In group B, 25 women received only tablet misoprostol 400 µg vaginally in the posterior fornix followed by the same dose 3 hourly for a maximum of five doses per 24 hours. Primary outcome was to compare the completeness of expulsion of products of conception by pelvic ultrasound after 48 hours of the last dose administered. Secondary outcome was to compare the Induction abortion interval (IAI), mean dose of misoprostol required, side effects, effect of parity, gestational age and cervical dilatation on IAI with both the regimens used.Results: The success rate was 76% in group A and 64% in group B. The mean induction abortion interval in group A was 8.9±4.70 hours whereas in group B, it was 13.14±6.03 hours and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.008). A statistically significant difference was also observed in mean dose of misoprostol required in group A and B being 1232.00±398.60 µg and 1584.00±423.94 µg respectively (p=0.004). The side effects were less in group A. Parity and cervical dilatation hold an inverse relation with the mean IAI whereas it has a direct relation with the gestational age.Conclusions: Regimen involving mifepristone priming 12 hours before misoprostol is better than misoprostol alone regimen with significant reduction in IAI, mean dose of misoprostol and less side effects. 

scholarly journals Efficacy of combination of tablet mifepristone and misoprostol for first trimester pregnancy termination at different gestational age

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Poonam Bhojwani ◽  
Pragati Meena ◽  
Gajendra Singh Verma
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Medical method of abortion is a safe, effective and affordable method for first trimester termination. However, nausea, vomiting, diarhoea, excess bleeding and incomplete abortion are known side effects. The aim of study was to compare the success rate of abortions in both groups, to compare the induction-abortion interval in both groups and to study the side effects of the drugs.Methods: This study was conducted in department of obstetrics and gynecology, NIMS Medical College, Jaipur, India during June 2017-August 2017. Total hundred cases were taken and divided into two groups. Group A was gestational age upto 49 days, Group B was gestational age 50-63 days. Both groups were given tab. mifepristone 200mg. followed by 48 hrs. by 4 tablets of tab misoprostol.Results: The results of the given regimen were highly successful and complete abortion was achieved in 96% and 94% in group A and group B respectively. The difference between two groups was statistically not significant (p value =0.64). Failure rates were seen in only 4% of group A and 6% of group B. Pain abdomen was seen in 16% of group A and 38% of group B patients. The difference between both groups was statistically significant (p value=0.02). Nausea was seen in 10% of group A and 30% of group B patients. The difference between both groups is statistically significant(p value=0.018).Conclusions: First trimester pregnancy can be successfully terminated with combination of mifepristone and misoprostol upto 63 days (9 weeks) of pregnancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document