scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness of Brexanolone Versus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for the Treatment of Postpartum Depression in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Eldar-Lissai ◽  
Joshua T. Cohen ◽  
Samantha Meltzer-Brody ◽  
Margaret E. Gerbasi ◽  
Elizabeth Chertavian ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Marc Patel

IntroductionWith their ease of administration, relatively benign side-effect profile and safety in overdose, in the United States the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have become de facto first choice in the treatment of geriatric depression, displacing tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). In this paper, the relevant literature regarding neurochemistry, kinetics, dosing, efficacy and differential side-effect profiles of citalopram, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine, the five currently available SSRIs in the USA, will be reviewed with special emphasis on geriatric data. Of late, considerable controversy has been generated regarding whether SSRIs are as effective as TCAs in severe and melancholic depressive subtypes. This important issue will be explored and the relative utility of all the SSRIs in the elderly patient compared and contrasted. Finally, reasons for difficulties in comparing results across studies will be elucidated.


2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Kendrick ◽  
Robert Peveler ◽  
Louise Longworth ◽  
David Baldwin ◽  
Michael Moore ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has not been compared in a prospective study in primary care.AimsTo determine the relative cost-effectiveness of TCAs, SSRIs and lofepramine in UK primary care.MethodAn open-label, three-arm randomised trial with a preference arm. Practitioners referred 327 patients with incident depression.ResultsNo significant differences were found in effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. The numbers of depression-free weeks over 12 months (on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were 25.3 (95% CI 21.3–29.0) for TCAs, 28.3 (95% CI 24.3–32.2) for SSRIs and 24.6 (95% CI 20.6–28.9) for lofepramine. Mean health service costs per patient were $762 (95% CI 553–1059) for TCAs, $875 (95% CI 675–1355) for SSRIs and $867 (95% CI 634–1521) for lofepramine. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves suggested SSRIs were most cost-effective (with a probability of up to 0.6).ConclusionsThe findings support a policy of recommending SSRIs as first-choice antidepressants in primary care.


PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy R. Eugene

Background Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most widely prescribed class of drugs in the practice of psychiatry. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and CYP2D6 are established as clinically relevant drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) that influence the pharmacokinetics of SSRIs and may either be grouped as being primarily metabolized by CYP2C19 or CYP2D6. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that the primary drug metabolizing pathway for SSRI antidepressants are associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to physiological modulation of organs with the highest gene tissue expression. Methods Post-marketing ADR cases were obtained from the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Events Reporting System from each of the four quarters for the years 2016 and 2017. Cases were grouped based on one of two primary pharmacokinetic pharmacogenomic pathway biomarkers CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. Citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline were grouped as CYP2C19 substrates and fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, and paroxetine as CYP2D6 substrates. Logistic regression was computed for the reported SSRI ADRs associated with one of two aforementioned DMEs. All data homogenization and computations were performed in R for statistical programming. Results The most commonly reported ADR among the SSRIs was anxiety (n = 3,332). The top two ADRs associated with SSRIs metabolized by CYP2D6 are: nightmare (n = 983) reporting odds-ratio (OR) = 4.37 (95% confidence interval (CI) [3.67–5.20]) and panic attack (n = 1,243) OR = 2.43 (95% CI [2.11–2.79]). Contrastingly, the top two ADRs for CYP2C19 metabolized SSRIs are: electrocardiogram QT prolonged (n = 351) OR = 0.18 (95% CI [0.13–0.24]) and small for dates baby (n = 306) OR = 0.19 (95% CI [0.14–0.26]). The study tested and produced 40 statistically significant CYP2C19- and CYP2D6-biased ADRs. In overall context, the results suggest that CYPC19 SSRI substrates are associated with ADRs related to modulation of the autonomic nervous system, seizure, pain, erectile-dysfunction, and absorption. Contrastingly, CYP2D6 SSRI substrates are associated with ADRs related to nightmares, withdrawal syndrome, and de-realization of cognitive processes. The results of this study may aid as guidance to optimize drug selection in psychopharmacology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document