scholarly journals The Criminal Liability of Legal Entities under the Laws of Bosnia and Herzegovina

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bosnia And Herzegovina ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Law System ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Proceeds Of Crime ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to a review of the laws of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the criminal liability of legal entities. The article reviews the criminal law system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which includes among other laws the four criminal codes: the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina; the Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina; the Criminal Code of the Republic of Srpska and the Criminal Code of the Brčko District. The author analyzes provisions of the criminal laws of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the criminal liability of legal entities. The author notes that pursuant to such provisions, legal entities are acknowledged as a criminal liability subject; gives a number of legal entities, which can be brought to criminal liability; underlines that legal entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina can be brought to criminal liability for any acts acknowledged as punishable by the national criminal laws. The publication reviews the grounds and conditions for the criminal liability of legal entities; the model of the criminal liability of legal entities; the criminal sanctions imposed on legal entities and the applied security measures. It is noted that the criminal codes in effect in Bosnia and Herzegovina make a distinction between the punishment measures, security measures, seizure of proceeds of crime and legal consequences of conviction of a legal entity.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability of Legal Entities under the Laws of the Republic of Slovenia

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Commercial Activities ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Conditional Sentence ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to review of the laws of the Republic of Slovenia on the criminal liability of legal entities; the main acts are the Special Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offenses of 1999 and the Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia. The article reviews statutory resolutions making it possible to review a legal entity as a criminal liability subject; gives a number of persons, which can be brought to criminal liability; focuses on the fact that legal entities can be brought to criminal liability in the Republic of Slovenia for a limited number of acts (crimes) defined by the law; considers criminal sanctions applicable to legal entities: fi ne, forfeiture of property, legal entity liquidation, prohibition to place securities held by a legal entity; reviews the possibility of imposition of a conditional sentence on a legal entity and the security measures applicable to legal entities, including: sentence publication and prohibition to engage in specific commercial activities.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability of Legal Entities under the Laws of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 73-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Republic Of Macedonia ◽  
Special Part ◽  
Yugoslav Republic ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Discretionary Powers ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to the review of the laws of the Republic of Macedonia (the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) on criminal liability of legal entities established in 2004 by introduction of amendments and supplements to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Macedonia. The article analyzes legal resolutions allowing consideration of a legal entity as a criminal liability subject; gives a scope of legal entities which can be brought to criminal liability; focuses on the fact that legal entities in the Republic of Macedonia may not be brought to criminal liability for any acts acknowledged as punishable by the national criminal laws, rather for the acts which are specifically addressed in the articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Macedonia or other criminal laws. The author reviews such types of criminal sanctions applicable to legal entities as a fine, legal entity liquidation, forfeiture and sentence publication; notes the circumstances taken into account at punishment imposition and conditions for release from punishment as well as criminal and procedural peculiarities of bringing legal entities to liability including indication of broad discretionary powers of a prosecutor in solution of issues on bringing legal entities to criminal liability.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability of Legal Entities under the Laws of the Republic of Croatia

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 76-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Conditional Sentence ◽  
The Republic ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to review of the laws of the Republic of Croatia on the criminal liability of legal entities; the main acts are the Special Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offenses of 2003, the Criminal Code of the Republic of Croatia and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Croatia. The article reviews statutory resolutions making it possible to review a legal entity as a criminal liability subject; gives a number of legal entities, which can be brought to criminal liability; focuses on the fact that legal entities can be brought to criminal liability in the Republic of Croatia for any acts defined by the law as crimes; considers criminal punishments (sanctions) applicable to legal entities: fi ne and legal entity liquidation; reviews the possibility of imposition of a conditional sentence on a legal entity; reviews the security measures applicable to legal entities, including: professional prohibitions (prohibitions to perform specific activities or transactions), prohibitions to perform transactions using national or local budgetary funds, prohibitions to receive licenses, permissions, subventions or concessions provided by national bodies; sentence publication and forfeiture.

scholarly journals Criminal Sanctions for Legal Entities in the Law of the Republic of Serbia

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragan Jovašević
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

In 2008, the Republic of Serbia adopted a special Law on Liability of Legal Persons for Criminal Offenses. In doing so, on the basis of the international standards contained in the relevant international documents, it joined a large number of countries that introduced criminal liability of legal persons for crimes committed in addition to their responsible persons at the end of the 20th century. For legal persons, the law prescribed a disparate system of criminal sanctions in response to the state-society’s response to such unlawful and punishable conduct. The system of criminal sanctions in the law of the Republic of Serbia includes: penalties, probation and security measures. The law defined the concept, character, legal nature, manner, procedure, pronouncement and execution of criminal sanctions, whose characteristics this particular work speaks of.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF LEGAL ENTITIES IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 68-77
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Slovak Republic ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Protective Measures ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
The Republic ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to the general issues of establishment of the criminal liability of legal entities in the Slovak Republic (Slovakia). Similarity of prerequisites for introduction of such liability in the Slovak Republic is noted. Gradual establishment of criminal liability of legal entities in Slovakia is noted, initially it was by means of amendment of the Criminal Code of Slovakia by Law No. 224/2010, which allows for using such “protective measures” as redemption and deprivation of property in relation to legal entities, then it was by means of adoption of Law No. 91/2016 on criminal liability of legal entities. Basic provisions of the Slovak law on criminal liability of legal entities are considered. The attention is paid to the fact that in the Slovak Republic there is a so-called selective criminalization as to the criminal liability of legal entities, when they can be held criminally liable not for all crimes specified in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovakia, but only for those of them, which are specified in the special Law No. 91/2016. A list of crimes, for which criminal liability is possible for legal entities, and conditions under which a crime is admitted to be committed by a legal entity, is specified. It is specified, which types of legal entities are foreseen by the Slovak law, and noted that not all of them can be the subjects of criminal liability according to the national laws. The effect of the criminal law is considered in relation to legal entities that have committed crimes in the territory of the Slovak Republic and outside it. The article contains the description of the types of criminal punishments of legal entities, which include: liquidation of the legal entity; deprivation of property; deprivation; penalty; prohibition to carry out activity; prohibition to receive subsidies and grants; prohibition to receive assistance and support from funds of the European Union; prohibition to participate in state procurement; publication of conviction.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability in Environmental Crimes Committed by Corporations after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 at Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitriani Rahmadia ◽  
Hari Sutra Disemadi ◽  
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Environmental Crimes ◽  
Legal Entities

Corporations are organized groups of people and / or properties, both in the form of legal entities or non-legal entities. In relation to the corporation as a legal subject in environmental crime, it is formulated in Article 1 number 32 of the Law Number 31 Year 2009 about Environmental Protection and Management, each person is an individual or business entity, both legal entities and non-legal entities. The context of corporate crime in the environment is still not solid enough to ensure corporations in criminal sanctions because there is no legal basis regarding the procedures for handling environmental crimes committed by corporations. The Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Corporate Crime provides a basis for enforcement of criminal law, then the purpose of writing this article is to find out the form of criminal liability for corporations for environmental crimes and legal consequences after the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2013.The type of research used is legal research which is included in the normative legal research typology where this study focuses on positive legal norms in the form of legislation. The theory used by the author in analyzing is using the theory of criminal liability which is based on the principle of legality. The conclusions include: criminal sanctions that can be applied to corporations based on Article 4 of Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 are in the form of criminal fines, additional crimes, and disciplinary actions except prisons and confinement. Last, the legal consequences of the application Article 25 Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 with the principal criminal is a criminal fine and then the criminal added according to the law governing environmental criminal acts is the Law Number 32 Year 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management.

scholarly journals Legal Consequences for Creditors Caused by Forced Withdrawal of Fiduciary Objects

NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Ryan Ari Hadinata
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Physical Violence ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Consequences

The researcher used the title Legal Consequences for Creditors Caused By Forced Withdrawal Of Fiduciary Objects. The formulation of the problems that arise includes, among others: what the creditor can take legal actions if the debtor does not pay the debt when it is due and what are the legal consequences faced by the creditor for the debtor's legal action related to the forced withdrawal of the object of fiduciary security by the creditor, The form of this research method is normative legal research, so in this study, an approach to legislation along with views and doctrines in legal science is analysed which is then analysed against the application of Law to resolve legal issues in this study. From the result the analysis carried out in this study, the researcher states that: as a result of the creditor executing the object of fiduciary security by force when the debtor defaults, it can be subject to criminal sanctions contained in Articles 335, 365, and 368 of the Criminal Code related to using coercion and physical violence and in Article 3 paragraph 1 of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 130/PMK.010/2012 which also imposes sanctions on financial institutions that do not register the object of guarantee at the fiduciary guarantee registration office. As for the things that underlie the parties to take legal action, namely: the creditor wants the debtor's obligations to be carried out correctly to pay off his debt. In contrast, the debtor wants to get protection against the forced withdrawal of the object of the guarantee carried out by the creditor.Keywords: Guarantee, Execution, Fiduciary

scholarly journals Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Berkenaan Dengan Kebenaran Substansi Akta Otentik

Rechtidee ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Wayan Paramarta Jaya
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Consequences

<p>Notary as a position has its own authority which is regulated with the rule of law to make an authAentic deed. This authority is described in Article 15 of Law Number 2 Year 2014 as amendments from UUJN. However, this authority is unperfect due to not arranged authority to Notary's for investigation, so the notary is unable to investigate the thruth of material document data fom confrontist is true or not. Condition like that often drag the Notary into legal issues in both criminal and civil problems. The purpose of this thesis research is divided into two, that is general purpose of an academic and special purpose is to examine and analyze how the notary accountability in making authentic deeds and to know and understand the legal consequences of authentic deeds made by the notary when the parties provide false data. This study is a normative juridical research using statute approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis of legal material obtained, basically a notary has responsibility for the formalities of an authentic deed and has no responsibility for the material of the contents the authentic deed except in the<em> relass </em>deed. Notaries can be requested of accountability if the Notary is proven to have committed administrative, civil and criminal violations. Notary must be responsible in terms of Administrative Law, Civil Law, that is in accordance with the provisions of sanctions contained in Article 84 and 85 on Amendment of UUJN and code of ethics, but in UUJN and UUJN Change Law does not regulate the existence of criminal sanctions. Notary cant be sought for criminal liability if there is a loss to one of the parties as a result of false documents from another party, since the notary only records what the parties have submitted to the deed. Such false statements shall be the responsibility of the parties, not the responsibility of the notary, unless such fraud or deceit originates from the Notary itself, a notary may be sought for criminal responsibility in accordance with article 263, 264, 266 of the Criminal Code.</p>

scholarly journals SAFETY MEASURE OF MANDATORY TREATMENT FREEDOM OF ALCOHOLICS (STANDARD AND PRACTICE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-160
Author(s):  
Slađana Mi ◽  
◽  
Dragana Mitrović ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Total Mass ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Safety Measure ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Safety Measures ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Security Measure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Criminal Legislation

In accordance with modern understandings of criminal law science and solutions present in the comparative criminal legislation, the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia pays special attention to security measures as special and above all specific criminal sanctions. They are one of the four types of criminal sanctions provided for in this legal text. Among the eleven security measures, four are of a medical nature and they differ in a number of features, not only in relation to other criminal sanctions, but also other security measures. One of the medical safety measures is the obligatory treatment of alcoholics. There are a number of specifics of this security measure, and one of them is its manner of execution. Given this, the subject of analysis in the paper are two aspects of the safety measure of compulsory treatment of alcoholics. These are: normative and practical. The justification of this approach in the analysis of the subject matter is contained in the fact that only adequately performed and this security measure is in the function of its standardization - the function of eliminating conditions or conditions that may affect the perpetrator in the future does not commit crimes due to alcohol dependence. to the expression of criminal acts of violence that are increasingly present in the total mass of crime.

scholarly journals The Kosovan Option of the Criminal Liability of Legal Entities

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Entities

The article is dedicated to a review of the laws on criminal liability of legal entities of a partially recognized state, the Republic of Kosovo. Its main acts are the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo, the special Law on the Liability of Legal Entities for Criminal Offenses and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kosovo, which came into force on January 1, 2013. The publication reviews statutory resolutions allowing considering a legal entity a criminal liability subject; pays attention to the fact that legal entities in the Republic of Kosovo may be brought to criminal liability for any actions acknowledged as crimes by the national criminal laws with no exceptions; specifies articles of the General Part of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo, provisions of which are applied to bringing legal entities to criminal liability; reviews such criminal sanction types applicable to legal entities as a fi ne, liquidation of a legal entity, property forfeiture; analyzes circumstances considered at punishment imposition and the conditions for release from punishment. The author notes the criminal procedure peculiarities of bringing legal entities to liability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document