Direito constitucional de recorrer e a judicialização da ineficiência empresarial

Resumo: A judicialização das questões consumeristas atinge o Supremo Tribunal Federal por via dos juizados especiais há vários anos. Recentemente uma empresa do ramo de telefonia, a Oi, destacou-se pelo volume desproporcional de processos que levou ao tribunal. Ao analisar o perfil da litigância de direito do consumidor da Oi no Supremo, identificamos que a empresa envia o dobro de processos do segundo colocado no ranking de maiores litigantes, apesar de ter taxa de sucesso menor do que 0,07%. No contexto da necessidade de adequada proteção dos direitos do consumidor, esse comportamento pode ser caracterizado como bullying processual e demanda novas atitudes por parte dos órgãos reguladores e do próprio Supremo.Palavras-chave: Direito do consumidor. Judicialização. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Abstract: The consumer rights lawsuits have reached the Brazilian Supreme Court through small claims courts for years. Recently, one phone company, Oi, stood out for the disproportional number of appeals it took to the court. We found that Oi brought double the number of appeals of the second most frequent appellant in consumer rights at the Supreme Court, even though Oi’s success rate is lower than 0,07%. In the context of appropriate consumer rights protection, this behavior can be characterized as lawsuit bullying and calls for a new attitude by the regulating agencies and the Supreme Court itself.Keywords: Consumer rights. Lawsuits. Brazilian Supreme Court.

Download Full-text

Pandemic and PILs: A Study on the Approach of the High Courts in India

Verfassung in Recht und Übersee ◽

10.5771/0506-7286-2021-1-55 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 54 (1) ◽

pp. 55-77

Author(s):

Uday Shankar ◽

Sourya Bandyopadhyay

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Supreme Court ◽

Public Interest ◽

Regional Level ◽

Public Interest Litigation ◽

High Court ◽

Human Rights Protection ◽

Rights Protection ◽

High Courts ◽

The Supreme Court

Studies in Public interest Litigation (PIL) in India are predominantly about the Supreme Court's approach in meeting the ends of justice through indigenously evolved jurisdiction. The High Courts as important constitutional bodies are more often than not remain out of detailed discussion. As the High Courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction with the Supreme Court with regard to PILs, this paper aims to study the pattern of invocation of the jurisdiction at the regional level. It surveys the variety of pleas and consequent action under PIL jurisdiction (or inaction, as the case may be) of different High Courts in India relating to covid crisis and consequential matters. To that end, it undertakes a survey of High Court orders or judgments from April to July, 2020. It seeks to lay bare the extent of demands that are made before the Courts through PIL. What kinds of action were expected from the High Courts during the pandemic? How did different Courts respond to such pleas? Were the directions and level of response homogenous or varied? The paper pursues these questions, and describes the pandemic though the lens of PIL in Indian High Courts. It goes on to argue that the High Courts in India need to take greater cognizance of their orders inter-se especially in PIL matters, as human rights protection through PIL cannot have contradictory voices.

Download Full-text

ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PROSES MEDIASI PERKARA PERDATA DI PENGADILAN

Media Iuris ◽

10.20473/mi.v1i2.8821 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 200

Author(s):

Ajrina Yuka Ardhira ◽

Ghansham Anand

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Success Rate ◽

Civil Procedure ◽

Good Faith ◽

Procedure Code ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Legal Consequences

Mediation is a duty which must be taken by the parties wishing to settle its dispute in the Court as specified in the Civil Procedure Code and in accordance with Article 130 HIR and 154 RGB. To improve the regulation of mediation in the Court, the Supreme Court shall issue its Regulation, namely the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in the Court. Where the regulations on mediation as stipulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 use good faith in its formal conditions. And with such a condition the Supreme Court expects the success rate of mediation in the first level to increase so as to reduce the number of cases accumulated at the Supreme Court. Good faith as a duty to the parties in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2016 is made clear in Article 7 paragraph (1), where there are legal consequences for parties that are considered not having good intentions by doing things listed in Article 7 paragraph (2) , namely Article 22 for the plaintiff and Article 23 for the defendant.

Download Full-text

DASAR FILOSOFIS DAN INKLUSIVITAS GUGATAN SEDERHANA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PERDATA

University Of Bengkulu Law Journal ◽

10.33369/ubelaj.3.1.1-14 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 1-14

Author(s):

Anita Afriana

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Judicial System ◽

Access To Justice ◽

Law System ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Small Claims ◽

The Common ◽

Small Claims Court ◽

Civil Law System ◽

Inexpensive Procedure

The fast litigation procedure stipulates under the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 year of 2015. That mechanism only requires small amount of permitted claim, it is 200 million Rupiah in maximum, it also settles claims in a very fast manner, 25 days in maximum. This fast procedural mechanism allocated to settle private dispute is called as “the small claims court”, in which, it is already implemented either in states with the civil law system or the common law system. The research methodology used in this article is juridical-normative and juridical kualitative analyze, to aim the SCC phisophy in Indonesia and the effectivity in enacting this mechanism of small claims court as one of the states that enact the civil judicial system. The results shows that the SCC in indonesia is an advancement as a means of access to justice, in short it is a simple and inexpensive procedure. that the fast litigation procedure stipulates under the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 year of 2015 is effectively enacted in civil judicial system in Indonesia. With society needs nowadays, the effort to increasing good services towards justice seeker, it’s inclusive because of the different mechanism of general judicial system under HIR/RBG, it is not just about time but also with a judge investigation, simple evidentiary, and without legal effort

Download Full-text

DASAR FILOSOFIS DAN INKLUSIVITAS GUGATAN SEDERHANA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PERDATA

University Of Bengkulu Law Journal ◽

10.33369/ubelaj.v3i1.4794 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 1-14

Author(s):

Anita Afriana

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Judicial System ◽

Access To Justice ◽

Law System ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Small Claims ◽

The Common ◽

Small Claims Court ◽

Civil Law System ◽

Inexpensive Procedure

The fast litigation procedure stipulates under the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 year of 2015. That mechanism only requires small amount of permitted claim, it is 200 million Rupiah in maximum, it also settles claims in a very fast manner, 25 days in maximum. This fast procedural mechanism allocated to settle private dispute is called as “the small claims court”, in which, it is already implemented either in states with the civil law system or the common law system. The research methodology used in this article is juridical-normative and juridical kualitative analyze, to aim the SCC phisophy in Indonesia and the effectivity in enacting this mechanism of small claims court as one of the states that enact the civil judicial system. The results shows that the SCC in indonesia is an advancement as a means of access to justice, in short it is a simple and inexpensive procedure. that the fast litigation procedure stipulates under the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 year of 2015 is effectively enacted in civil judicial system in Indonesia. With society needs nowadays, the effort to increasing good services towards justice seeker, it’s inclusive because of the different mechanism of general judicial system under HIR/RBG, it is not just about time but also with a judge investigation, simple evidentiary, and without legal effort

Download Full-text

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDIATION IN COMPLETING DIVORCE CASES IN JAMBI PROVINCIAL RELIGIOUS COURT

International Journal of Southeast Asia ◽

10.47783/journijsa.v2i1.196 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Fitriyah Alkaff ◽

A. Husein Ritonga ◽

A. A. Miftah Miftah

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Success Rate ◽

Success Factors ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Religious Courts

The accumulation of cases always increases from year to year. For this reason, the Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No.1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures in court, as an effort to reduce the number of cases that go to court, including divorce. but unfortunately mediation does not show the expected success rate in religious courts. This research reveals the failure and success factors of mediation in the Jambi religious court, the role of the mediator in resolving divorce cases and exploring the effectiveness of mediation in divorce cases. This research is located at the location of divorce cases, namely the Jambi City Religious Court, the Kuala Tungkal Religious Court and the Sarolangun Religious Court. The results of this study prove that; first, the mediation success rate is only 4%. The failure factor for mediation is the lack of judges as mediators, there is no incentive funds for mediators who succeed in reconciling the mediator who does not have sufficient skills in dealing with the parties. Second, the role of the mediator in resolving divorce cases is not only as a facilitator but as a catalyst, educator, supporter and psychiatrist depending on the case at hand.

Download Full-text

EFEKTIFITAS MEDIASI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PERCERAIAN (STUDY DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BUKITTINGGI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA PAYAKUMBUH TAHUN 2015-2017)

Soumatera Law Review ◽

10.22216/soumlaw.v1i2.3722 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 314-334

Author(s):

Rahmat Fauzi ◽

Faisal

Keyword(s):

Qualitative Analysis ◽

Supreme Court ◽

Success Rate ◽

Court Case ◽

Economic Factors ◽

Legal Provision ◽

Inhibiting Factors ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Good Will ◽

Religious Courts

This research was conducted to reveal the Effectiveness of Mediation in Resolving Divorce Disputes in the Religious Courts. The purpose of this study is to describe the application and success rate of mediation in divorce cases in accordance with PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures. As well as explaining the factors that are obstacles and driving the application of mediation as an effort to reduce the rate of divorce against divorce cases in the Religious Courts. So that the problems faced in the divorce dispute can be resolved through mediation by referring to PERMA No. 1 of 2016. This research will be conducted in the Bukittinggi Religious Court and Payakumbuh Religious Court, Case of 2015-2017. The approach used in this research is a sociological juridical approach which is a research based on a legal provision and a phenomenon or event that occurs in the field. The method used in analyzing data is using qualitative analysis methods. The conclusion of this study is the application of mediation in divorce cases in the Religion Court of the Bukittinggi Religion Court and the Payakumbuh Religious Court have not been effective because they are not in accordance with the intention of the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation on Mediation Procedures in court. The success rate of mediation in the Bukittinggi Religious Court and Payakumbuh Religious Courts in 2015, 2016 and 2017 is very low, as evidenced by the number of cases that succeeded in mediating ± 5%. Supporting factors for the success of mediation: the ability of mediators, sociological and psychological, moral and spiritual factors and the good will of the parties. While the inhibiting factors for the success of mediation are as follows: the strong desire of the parties to divorce, prolonged conflict and economic factors.

Download Full-text

Implementation of the Small Claims Court in Dispute Case Settlement in Indonesia

Lex Scientia Law Review ◽

10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.42859 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Seno Adhi Wibowo ◽

Massulthan Rafi Wijaya

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Dispute Resolution ◽

Dispute Settlement ◽

Low Cost ◽

Judicial Process ◽

Resolution Process ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Review Procedure ◽

Small Claims ◽

Small Claims Court

Dispute settlement through the courts (litigation) is perceived as ineffective and costly. The dispute resolution process through the courts is prolonged and time-consuming due to its very formal and very technical review procedure, high costs of the case, and the likelihood of repeated trials. The number of complaints made against citizens unwilling to deal with the judiciary. The Supreme Court with its authority to address the problems of the courts (litigation), namely by ratifying the 2015 Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 concerning the procedures for the settlement of the Small Claims Court, to allow all elements of society to take a new direction of litigation, namely through Small Claims Court a simple, fast and low-cost lawsuit. With this, it hopes that the judicial process in Indonesia will be well underway in the future.

Download Full-text

Malpractice & Negligence: Cal. Supreme Court Clarifies Negligence Provisions under State’s Elder Abuse Act

The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics ◽

10.1017/s1073110500012973 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 27 (2) ◽

pp. 203-203

Author(s):

Kendra Carlson

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Supreme Court ◽

Health Care Providers ◽

Elder Abuse ◽

Skilled Nursing Facility ◽

Pressure Sores ◽

Care Providers ◽

Nursing Facility ◽

Skilled Nursing ◽

The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of California held, in Delaney v. Baker, 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 610 (1999), that the heightened remedies available under the Elder Abuse Act (Act), Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 15657,15657.2 (West 1998), apply to health care providers who engage in reckless neglect of an elder adult. The court interpreted two sections of the Act: (1) section 15657, which provides for enhanced remedies for reckless neglect; and (2) section 15657.2, which limits recovery for actions based on “professional negligence.” The court held that reckless neglect is distinct from professional negligence and therefore the restrictions on remedies against health care providers for professional negligence are inapplicable.Kay Delaney sued Meadowood, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), after a resident, her mother, died. Evidence at trial indicated that Rose Wallien, the decedent, was left lying in her own urine and feces for extended periods of time and had stage I11 and IV pressure sores on her ankles, feet, and buttocks at the time of her death.

Download Full-text

Medical and Legal Issues Raised by the Protz Decision Issued by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Guides Newsletter ◽

10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2017.julaug03 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 22 (4) ◽

pp. 12-13

Author(s):

LuAnn Haley ◽

Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Scientific Evidence ◽

Workers Compensation ◽

Sixth Edition ◽

Complex Concept ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Compensation Claims ◽

Recent Edition ◽

Impairment Ratings ◽

Definition Of

Abstract Pennsylvania adopted the impairment rating provisions described in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) in 1996 as an exposure cap for employers seeking predictability and cost control in workers’ compensation claims. In 2017, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania handed down the Protz decision, which held that requiring physicians to apply the methodology set forth in the most recent edition of the AMA Guides reflected an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the American Medical Association. The decision eliminates the impairment-rating evaluation (IRE) mechanism under which claimants were assigned an impairment rating under the most recent edition of the AMA Guides. The AMA Guides periodically are revised to include the most recent scientific evidence regarding impairment ratings, and the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, acknowledges that impairment is a complex concept that is not yet defined in a way that readily permits an evidence-based definition of assessment. The AMA Guides should not be considered standards frozen in time simply to withstand future scrutiny by the courts; instead, workers’ compensation acts could state that when a new edition of the AMA Guides is published, the legislature shall review and consider adopting the new edition. It appears unlikely that the Protz decision will be followed in other jurisdictions: Challenges to using the AMA Guides in assessing workers’ compensation claims have been attempted in three states, and all attempts failed.

Download Full-text