scholarly journals Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ido Roll ◽  
Philip H. Winne

Self-regulated learning is an ongoing process rather than a single snapshot in time. Naturally, the field of learning analytics, focusing on interactions and learning trajectories, offers exciting opportunities for analyzing and supporting self-regulated learning. This special section highlights the current state of research in the intersect of self-regulated learning and learning analytics, bridging communities, disciplines, and schools of thoughts. In this editorial, we introduce the papers and identify themes and challenges in understanding and support self-regulated learning in interactive learning environments.

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragan Gasevic ◽  
Shane Dawson ◽  
Jelena Jovanovic

This issue of the Journal of Learning Analytics features a special section on ethics and privacy that is guest edited by a team of researchers involved in the European Learning Analytics Community Exchange (LACE) project. The issue also features a paper that looks at the use of new methods for the measurement of self-regulated learning. This editorial concludes with a summary of the future changes in the editorial team of the journal.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 356-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Wong ◽  
Martine Baars ◽  
Dan Davis ◽  
Tim Van Der Zee ◽  
Geert-Jan Houben ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yizhou Fan ◽  
Wannisa Matcha ◽  
Nora’ayu Ahmad Uzir ◽  
Qiong Wang ◽  
Dragan Gašević

AbstractThe importance of learning design in education is widely acknowledged in the literature. Should learners make effective use of opportunities provided in a learning design, especially in online environments, previous studies have shown that they need to have strong skills for self-regulated learning (SRL). The literature, which reports the use of learning analytics (LA), shows that SRL skills are best exhibited in choices of learning tactics that are reflective of metacognitive control and monitoring. However, in spite of high significance for evaluation of learning experience, the link between learning design and learning tactics has been under-explored. In order to fill this gap, this paper proposes a novel learning analytic method that combines three data analytic techniques, including a cluster analysis, a process mining technique, and an epistemic network analysis. The proposed method was applied to a dataset collected in a massive open online course (MOOC) on teaching in flipped classrooms which was offered on a Chinese MOOC platform to pre- and in-service teachers. The results showed that the application of the approach detected four learning tactics (Search oriented, Content and assessment oriented, Content oriented and Assessment oriented) which were used by MOOC learners. The analysis of tactics’ usage across learning sessions revealed that learners from different performance groups had different priorities. The study also showed that learning tactics shaped by instructional cues were embedded in different units of study in MOOC. The learners from a high-performance group showed a high level of regulation through strong alignment of the choices of learning tactics with tasks provided in the learning design. The paper also provides a discussion about implications of research and practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda P. Montgomery ◽  
Amin Mousavi ◽  
Michael Carbonaro ◽  
Denyse V. Hayward ◽  
William Dunn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document