scholarly journals Pretreatment nutritional risk scores and performance status are prognostic factors in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (58) ◽  
pp. 98974-98984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Song ◽  
Qiuyan Wan ◽  
Wenke Yu ◽  
Jianbo Li ◽  
Shaohua Lu ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Marie Vanseymortier ◽  
Marie-Edith Bonneterre ◽  
Stéphanie Clisant ◽  
Eric Dansin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Dong ◽  
Xiguang Liu ◽  
Shunfang Zhu ◽  
Di Lu ◽  
Kaican Cai ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidoriki Irene ◽  
Schizas Dimitrios ◽  
Mpaili Efstratia ◽  
Mpoura Maria ◽  
Hasemaki Natasha ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim To investigate the impact of malnutrition on postoperative complications in esophageal cancer patients. Background and Methods Malnutrition is common in esophageal cancer patients due to the debilitating nature of their disease. Several methods of nutritional assessment have emerged as significant prognostic factors for short-and long-term outcomes in patients operated for esophageal cancer. The study sample consisted of 85 patients with esophageal (n=11) and gastroesophageal junction (n=74) cancer who were admitted for surgery in the First Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece, between September 2015 and March 2019. Out of them, 65 patients underwent esophagectomy, while 20 patients underwent total gastrectomy. The assessment of nutritional status included the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and sarcopenia. GNRI was based on preoperative values of patients’ serum albumin and body weight. The preoperative assessment of sarcopenia was based on Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) derived from analysis of CT scans using SliceOmatic® Software version 4.3 (Tomovision, Montreal, Canada). Postoperative complications were graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Minor complications included categories I-II, whereas major complications included categories III-V. Results Thirty nine patients (47.6%) developed postoperative complications. More specifically, 21 patients (24.7%) developed minor complications and 18 patients (21.2%) developed major complications, while anastomotic leakage occurred in 10 patients (11.8%). Eighty patients (94.1%) had a high-risk GNRI (<92), while 5 patients (5.9%) had a low-risk GNRI (≥92). Forty four patients (51.8%) were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The mean PG-SGA score was 8.82 ± 5.57. Patients with a high-risk GNRI demonstrated significantly higher rate of overall complications compared to low-risk GNRI patients (100% vs 44.2%, p<0.05 respectively). Moreover, the rate of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group (29% vs 3.4%, p<0.05). Nonetheless, PG-SGA was not significantly associated with postoperative outcomes. Conclusion Higher-risk scores on the GNRI are associated with an increased risk for developing postoperative complications, while sarcopenia is associated with higher risk for anastomotic leakage among esophageal cancer patients. Preoperative assessment of GNRI and sarcopenia should be performed in all patients in order to detect patients who are at greater risk of postoperative morbidity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv533
Author(s):  
C. Vazeille ◽  
J. Durand ◽  
N. Neveux ◽  
A. Cessot ◽  
P. Boudou-Rouquette ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Masashi Takeuchi ◽  
Hirofumi Kawakubo ◽  
Shuhei Mayanagi ◽  
Kazumasa Fukuda ◽  
Rieko Nakamura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with salvage esophagectomy has improved overall survival (OS) for esophageal cancer, it is a more invasive approach than neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery or surgery alone, and causes high mortality after surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the short and long-term outcomes of salvage esophagectomy, to determine their prognostic factors, and to create a prediction model for OS using a classification and regression tree (CART). Methods Ninety patients who had undergone CRT followed by esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between June 1994 and August 2014 were identified for this study. We divided the 90 patients into two groups—the salvage group and the neoadjuvant group—according to the dose of irradiation of CRT. Forty-four patients who underwent CRT with radiation dose less than 50 Gy, followed by planned esophagectomy, were allocated to the neoadjuvant group. Forty-six patients with salvage esophagectomy for locally recurrent or residual cancer after definitive CRT (greater than 50 Gy) were allocated to the salvage group. Results Patients from the salvage group tended to have a lower OS (median survival: Salvage, 25 months vs neoadjuvant, 50 months, P = 0.149). In the salvage group, pneumonia and age were identified as factors predictive of in-hospital mortality. OS was significantly lower in patients with postoperative pneumonia and female gender. We set the prediction model for OS in the salvage group using survival CART. The group of R1/2 resection aged ≥ 56.5 years and the group suffering from postoperative pneumonia were the groups at highest risk; the area under the curve was 0.72. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the short-term and long-term prognostic factors of salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT for esophageal cancer. Achieving improvement in OS after salvage surgery requires increased R0 resection rates and decreased pulmonary complications. Both informed decision making in the adoption of salvage surgery and specific plans to reduce pneumonia through means such as pulmonary rehabilitation are required. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 465-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Bus ◽  
Valery E. Lemmens ◽  
Martijn G. van Oijen ◽  
Geert-Jan Creemers ◽  
Grard A. Nieuwenhuijzen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document