scholarly journals Diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for evaluation of liver dysfunction: a multivariable analysis of 3T MRI sequences

Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (91) ◽  
pp. 36371-36378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklas Verloh ◽  
Kirsten Utpatel ◽  
Florian Zeman ◽  
Claudia Fellner ◽  
Hans J. Schlitt ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. e58-e63 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Ai ◽  
W. Zhang ◽  
N.K. Priddy ◽  
X. Li

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 388-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demet Dogan ◽  
Nagihan Inan ◽  
Hasan Tahsin Sarisoy ◽  
Sevtap Gumustas ◽  
Gur Akansel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Augusto Lio M. Goncalves Filho ◽  
John Conklin ◽  
Maria Gabriela F. Longo ◽  
Stephen F. Cauley ◽  
Daniel Polak ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6Part11) ◽  
pp. 3447-3447
Author(s):  
F Diaz Molina ◽  
Y Cao ◽  
E Klein ◽  
J Knisely ◽  
G Gill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3T Mri ◽  

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1026-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho-Jin Lee ◽  
Se Eun Kim ◽  
Jee Youn Moon ◽  
Je-Young Shin ◽  
Yong-Chul Kim

BackgroundAlthough the quantitative sensory axon reflex test (QSART) is used to evaluate sudomotor dysfunction in the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), its validity remains controversial. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of the QSART for CRPS and assessed associations between results of the QSART and other clinical variables.MethodsWe examined the electronic medical records of 196 consecutive patients who underwent the QSART with a suspected diagnosis of CRPS, during the period from January 2013 to December 2015. To assess the diagnostic performance of the QSART for CRPS based on the Budapest research criteria, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio. Furthermore, we performed binary logistic regression analyses to investigate the relationships between QSART results and other clinical variables.ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of the QSART for diagnosing CRPS were 67.6% and 40.6%, respectively. The OR for diagnosing CRPS using the QSART was not statistically significant (1.43; 95% CI 0.65 to 3.14; p=0.376), whereas it was for distinguishing CRPS types I and II (4.11; 95% CI 1.34 to 12.57; p=0.013). In multivariable analysis, there were no correlations between the results of the QSART and other variables, except hypertension (OR=0.34; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.91; p=0.032).ConclusionThe QSART showed low diagnostic value as a screening or a confirmatory test for CRPS according to the Budapest research criteria. CRPS type II was more likely than CRPS type I to result in abnormal QSART results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document