scholarly journals New Equity Performance Following Chapter 11 Emergence

Author(s):  
Nicholas K. Wold ◽  
Judith A. Laux

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This body of research investigates how the performance of exchange-traded common equity from firms in Chapter 11 bankruptcy emergence compares with common stock from non-bankrupt competitors and recently public peers in short and long-term time horizons.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Return data are gathered for a sample of sixteen financially restructured companies, each paired with two non-distressed industry competitors and one recently-public peer.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model as a primary analytical tool, empirical tests show a positive correlation in equity returns among the samples of restructured and non-distressed market competitors and a stock underperformance from the sample of IPO competitors.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>These results suggest that markets are better at judging the value of post-Chapter 11 companies relative to newly public companies and refute the theory of IPO price momentum.</span></span></p>

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raj S. Dhankar ◽  
Rohini Singh

There is conflicting evidence on the applicability of Capital Asset Pricing Model in the Indian stock market. Data for 158 stocks listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange was analyzed using a number of tests from 1991–2002, the period which roughly coincides with the period after liberalization and initiation of capital market reforms. Taken in aggregate the various empirical tests show that CAPM is not valid for the Indian stock market for the period studied.


Author(s):  
S. Jamaledin Mohseni Zonouzi ◽  
Gholamreza Mansourfar ◽  
Fateme Bagherzadeh Azar

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate opportunities of the short- and long-run international portfolio diversification (IPD) benefits by investing in the Middle Eastern oil-producing countries. Over the past decades, IPD has been the integral feature of global capital markets. Several potential benefits like increasing returns and/or reducing risk have made investors to internationalize their portfolios. Solnik’s theory (1974) approved that gains can be achieved through IPD if returns in the different markets are not perfectly correlated. This may attribute to low correlations of equity returns among different economies. In this regards, there would be a large potential of diversification benefits for investors that diversify into new emerging group of economies such as equity markets of the main oil-producing countries. These markets are often segmented and they may ensure a superior return rate for a given risk level. Design/methodology/approach – In most of the previous studies, Pearson’s correlation test is used to analyze the short-run relationship of market prices. However, recent empirical studies indicate that correlations between equity returns vary over the time. To examine the time-varying conditional correlation, this paper used the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) model to investigate opportunities of the short-run IPD benefits. In addition, for the long-run linkage analysis, the autoregressive distributed lag (ADRL) approach introduced by Pesaran et al. (2001) is applied. Findings – It is found that, the market returns of the sampled countries are not definitely correlated in the short- and long-term. So, international portfolio investors may get the short- and long-term diversification benefits by diversifying their portfolios among the Middle Eastern equity markets, namely, Iran, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia and UAE. Originality/value – This paper departs from earlier studies by focusing on the dynamic characteristics of correlation. Two main issues are pursued in this paper. First, instead of modeling the correlation by methods like Pearson correlation coefficient that consider the constant-correlation assumption, this paper directly uses the DCC model. Second, to empirically estimate the long-run relationship among stock markets in the Middle Eastern oil-producing countries, the ARDL approach is utilized. The ARDL approach is more robust and performs well for small sample sizes than other co-integration techniques.


2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 25-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene F Fama ◽  
Kenneth R French

The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) of William Sharpe (1964) and John Lintner (1965) marks the birth of asset pricing theory (resulting in a Nobel Prize for Sharpe in 1990). Before their breakthrough, there were no asset pricing models built from first principles about the nature of tastes and investment opportunities and with clear testable predictions about risk and return. Four decades later, the CAPM is still widely used in applications, such as estimating the cost of equity capital for firms and evaluating the performance of managed portfolios. And it is the centerpiece, indeed often the only asset pricing model taught in MBA level investment courses. The attraction of the CAPM is its powerfully simple logic and intuitively pleasing predictions about how to measure risk and about the relation between expected return and risk. Unfortunately, perhaps because of its simplicity, the empirical record of the model is poor - poor enough to invalidate the way it is used in applications. The model's empirical problems may reflect true failings. (It is, after all, just a model.) But they may also be due to shortcomings of the empirical tests, most notably, poor proxies for the market portfolio of invested wealth, which plays a central role in the model's predictions. We argue, however, that if the market proxy problem invalidates tests of the model, it also invalidates most applications, which typically borrow the market proxies used in empirical tests. For perspective on the CAPM's predictions about risk and expected return, we begin with a brief summary of its logic. We then review the history of empirical work on the model and what it says about shortcomings of the CAPM that pose challenges to be explained by more complicated models.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babak Jafarizadeh ◽  
Reidar B. Bratvold

For their appraisals, most companies use discount rates that account for timing and riskiness of projects. Yet, especially for commodity projects, discounting future cash flows is generally at odds with the assumptions in a company’s hurdle rate. With a multitude of technical and market uncertainties, inconsistent assessments lead to biased valuations and poor investment decisions. In this paper, we consider price forecasts and discount rates in an integrated framework. We calibrate the risk premiums in a two-factor stochastic price process with a capital asset pricing model-based discount rate. Together with the analysts’ long-term prices forecasts, the suggested method improves consistency in valuation and decision making.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 30-41
Author(s):  
Sunny Oswal ◽  
Kushagra Goel

This paper studies the concept of equity returns and sees whether there is a significant difference between the expected return which is calculated through the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and the actual return given by the stock. For this study, 10 stocks with maximum market capitalization are taken focusing on 12 countries for our research subdivided into developed and developing countries. The period of study is 10 calendar years from 2010 to 2019. The hypothesis being whether the actual stock returns are significantly different from the expected stock return, for the same paired t-test has been deployed on 120 stocks to check the significance. Further evaluation has been done to check whether the expected return is undervalued or overvalued in reference to the actual return. To check whether there is a significant difference between the actual and expected return across the companies, panel regression was used, and then the same was done to check whether there is a significant difference between countries and also whether there is a significant difference on the basis whether the countries are developed or developing. The authors have existing research confined to particular geographies that discuss VAR models


Author(s):  
Janet West ◽  
Judy Laux

<p class="MsoBlockText" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; mso-pagination: none;"><span style="font-style: normal; color: black; mso-bidi-font-style: italic; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Despite their prominence in financial theory and practice, the Capital Asset Pricing Model and its critical beta component have failed test after test to explain stock returns.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Research by Campbell and Vuolteenaho cites the misspecification of beta as the reason for this failure.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>They measure beta as the sum of two components: a more influential &ldquo;cash-flow&rdquo; beta and a secondary &ldquo;discount-rate&rdquo; beta.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The current study creates a ratio between the overall beta of a stock and the cash-flow component and uses an ordinary least squares regression model to determine its significance in interpreting overall returns to a stock, hypothesizing that the ratio will better explain returns than the overall beta alone.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The results are mixed but suggest significant explanatory power for the beta range of 0.60 to 0.95.</span></span></span></p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-70
Author(s):  
Wong Weng Wong ◽  
◽  
Wejendra Reddy ◽  

This study explores the sensitivity of the performance of Australian real estate investment trusts (A-REITs) to changes in short and long term interest rates. Based on the intertemporal capital asset pricing model in Merton (1973), we propose an asset pricing model that consists of market returns, macroeconomic indicators, and short and long term interest rates. The effect of market capitalisation is also explored. High debt funds show greater sensitivity to adverse movements in long term interest rates compared to low debt funds. This suggests that gearing levels play a significant role in the returns generating process. All size based portfolios exhibit strong exposure to market risk with medium size A-REITs displaying greater sensitivity to movements in both short and long term interest rates. Although market risk became a stronger driver of returns during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), the impact was less prominent post-GFC possibly due to already low levels of interest which created an environment of cheap credit. The implications for asset allocation strategies are that portfolio managers and other investors can reduce exposure to interest rate risk by selecting funds with less leverage and are large in size. High debt funds benefit more during periods of low interest but this may be offset when there is a corresponding increase in long term interest rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document