Current advances in zinc in soils and plants: implications for zinc efficiency and biofortification studies

Author(s):  
Gokhan Hacisalihoglu ◽  
◽  
Matthew W. Blair ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsin S. Al-Fahdawi ◽  
Jason A. Able ◽  
Margaret Evans ◽  
Amanda J. Able

Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) is susceptible to Fusarium pseudograminearum and sensitive to zinc (Zn) deficiency in Australian soils. However, little is known about the interaction between these two potentially yield-limiting factors, especially for Australian durum varieties. The critical Zn concentration (concentration of Zn in the plant when there is a 10% reduction in yield) and degree of susceptibility to F. pseudograminearum was therefore determined for five Australian durum varieties (Yawa, Hyperno, Tjilkuri, WID802, UAD1153303). Critical Zn concentration averaged 24.6 mg kg–1 for all durum varieties but differed for the individual varieties (mg kg–1: Yawa, 21.7; Hyperno, 22.7; Tjilkuri, 24.1; WID802, 24.8; UAD1153303, 28.7). Zinc efficiency also varied amongst genotypes (39–52%). However, Zn utilisation was similar amongst genotypes under Zn-deficient or Zn-sufficient conditions (0.51–0.59 and 0.017–0.022 g DM μg–1 Zn, respectively). All varieties were susceptible to F. pseudograminearum but the development of symptoms and detrimental effect on shoot biomass and grain yield were significantly greater in Tjilkuri. Even though crown rot symptoms may still be present, the supply of adequate Zn in the soil helped to maintain biomass and grain yield in all durum varieties. However, the extent to which durum varieties were protected from plant growth penalties due to crown rot by Zn treatment was genotype-dependent.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 648-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Singh ◽  
Arvind K. Shukla ◽  
Sanjib K. Behera ◽  
Pankaj K. Tiwari ◽  
Soumitra Das ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 306 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zvi Peleg ◽  
Yehoshua Saranga ◽  
Atilla Yazici ◽  
Tzion Fahima ◽  
Levent Ozturk ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 263 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Genc ◽  
G.K. McDonald ◽  
R.D. Graham

2001 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 456-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gokhan Hacisalihoglu ◽  
Jonathan J. Hart ◽  
Leon V. Kochian

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Wang ◽  
X. E. Yang ◽  
C. X. He

HortScience ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 571b-571
Author(s):  
Andrew Riseman ◽  
Richard Craig

Research in Penn State's Exacum breeding program has revealed genotypic variation for the development of zinc deficiency, which may indicate the presence of zinc efficiency factors. Through preliminary experiments, we have identified both genetic families and individual genotypes that can be classified as either zinc-efficient or zinc-inefficient. Chi-square contingency analyses indicate significant differences (P < 0.001) in segregation patterns for zinc deficiency among hybrid families. Segregation patterns within families ranged from 100% of the progeny developing zinc deficiency to 100% of the progeny remaining healthy. Two genotypes contrasting in zinc efficiency have been identified and used in experiments designed to investigate physiological factors related to zinc efficiency. The zinc-efficient genotype has a significantly higher ability to decrease solution pH (P < 0.01), significantly higher root cation exchange capacity (P < 0.007), significantly lower root/shoot ratio (P < 0.001), significantly lower water loss/cm2 leaf (P < 0.03), and significantly higher fresh weight/dry weight ratio (P < 0.001). Research on zinc uptake rates is currently being conducted utilizing the efficient and inefficient genotypes. Based on all of our research, we conclude that 1) a strong genetic effect is involved in the zinc nutritional status of interspecific Exacum hybrids and 2) a number of physiological traits differ between zinc-efficient and zinc-inefficient genotypes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document