scholarly journals Public Opinion Survey Data to Measure Sympathy and Support for Islamist Terrorism: A Look at Muslim Opinions on Al Qaeda and IS

Author(s):  
Alex Schmid
Author(s):  
Caroline Beunckens ◽  
Cristina Sotto ◽  
Geert Molenberghs ◽  
Geert Verbeke

Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Knoll and ◽  
Cammie Jo Bolin

This chapter returns to the public opinion survey data to examine the same question as the previous chapter but from a quantitative perspective. In general, the evidence shows that the presence of female clergy, policies regarding female clergy, and lay female leadership in congregations matter in terms of people’s level of religiosity, spirituality, and trust in and identification with their congregations. These effects, though, are more modest than often asserted: women in congregations with the strongest degree of female leadership have levels of religiosity—about 13% higher than women in congregations with the maximum amount of male leadership. The evidence also shows that sharing leadership equally between men and women would produce similar results. Most interestingly, we find that the effects are found not only among women but especially among political and theological progressives.


1983 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93
Author(s):  
S.A. Dodd ◽  
P.M. Rector

Author(s):  
Caroline Beunckens ◽  
Cristina Sotto ◽  
Geert Molenberghs ◽  
Geert Verbeke

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 71-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yordan K. Kutiyski ◽  
André Krouwel

AbstractThis article seeks to explain why electoral support for the Venezuelan opposition has increased substantially, using Venezuelan public opinion survey data from LAPOP and an opt-in sample collected through the online vote advice application Brújula Presidencial Venezuela. It analyzes why Venezuelans who had either voted for Chávez or abstained in 2006 defected and started to support the opposition in subsequent elections. It proposes several reasons: negative voter evaluations of the economy, concern for public safety, and dissatisfaction with Venezuelan democracy. While the finding that negative policy evaluations boost support for the opposition aligns with theoretical expectations, this study finds a strong relationship between having different evaluations of the quality of democracy and supporting Chávez, which shows that the advocacy of two competing visions of democracy by the incumbent and the opposition also affects voting patterns in Venezuela.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 967-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Frye

Do economic sanctions turn the public against the target government or cause it to rally around the flag? How do sanctions affect attitudes toward the sanctioner? How does bad economic performance under sanctions shape support for the target government? Despite their importance, these questions have rarely been explored with survey data. Results from two surveys in Russia find that exposure to information about economic sanctions does not generate a rally around the flag, leads some groups to withdraw support from the target government, and reduces support for the sanctioner. Respondents also react more strongly to the reasons why sanctions were put in place—the annexation of Crimea—than to the sanctions themselves. These results suggest the need to reevaluate theories of the impact of economic sanctions and blame-shifting under autocracy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document