A Comparative Analysis of the Research Trends of Private Tutoring in Korea and China: Focus on 2000~2017

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-193
Author(s):  
Chunjia Zhou ◽  
Myung-Hee Park
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Private Tutoring ◽  
Research Trends

scholarly journals Multi-Omics Research Trends in Sepsis: A Bibliometric, Comparative Analysis Between the United States, the European Union 28 Member States, and China

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Evangelatos ◽  
Kapaettu Satyamoorthy ◽  
Georgia Levidou ◽  
Pia Bauer ◽  
Helmut Brand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
European Union ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Trends ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Member States

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pwint Kay Khine ◽  
Jianing Mi ◽  
Raza Shahid
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Research Trends ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Production Studies ◽  
Production Study ◽  
Service Production ◽  
Conceptual Paper

The purpose of this study is to explore conceptual approaches in co-production studies and to examine current research trends of the study. The conceptual paper includes research articles related to co-production in public administration field. By thoroughly scrutinizing 32 research works of co-production, this study highlights major loopholes in the field of the study. The contributions of the study are: (1) identifying two common characteristics of co-production, (2) categorising three types of co-producing by end-users, and (3) finding that goals and success of co-production are more beneficial for service providers though its initial approach is citizen-centric approach. We suggest that future studies should be (1) to focus on reasons for co-production failures or success, (2) to discover further hindrances for co-production in service production, (3) to examine influencing factors on service providers as well as institutional impacts on co-production process, and (4) to include practical assessment in co-production study.

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis of Disaster Research Trends Using Topic Modeling and Network Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 79-88
Author(s):  
Chae Yeon Han ◽  
Woo Sik Kim ◽  
Dong Keun Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Risk Perception ◽  
Topic Modeling ◽  
Community Resilience ◽  
Research Trends ◽  
The Other ◽  
Disaster Research ◽  
Engineering Research ◽  
The Past ◽  
And Behavior

This study aims to analyze differences in domestic and international disaster research trends. We first performed topic modeling on 20,477 papers published in three domestic and 12 international journals over the last 21 years (2000-2020) and then visualized the trends. Based on the extracted topics and keywords, we analyzed keyword networks using Gephi. Research in domestic journals mainly revolved around natural disasters like earthquakes, fire, and flooding. In contrast, international journals spotlighted policy-based topics such as disaster governance and community resilience. Meanwhile, globally, building and civil engineering research has shrunk in recent five years (we refer to this as a cold topic). On the other hand, in the past five years, fire and flood research has appeared more frequently in domestic journals, while international journals have presented more articles on community resilience, risk perception, and behavior (we refer to this as a hot topic). Results of this research can provide suggestions about the directions domestic disaster research should develop in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document