scholarly journals Sustracción internacional de menores y enfermedad psiquiátrica del progenitor no sustractor. Comentario del Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de les Illes Balears (Sección IV), núm. 37/2018, de 14 de junio = International child abduction and psychiatric illness of the non-abducting parent. Comment on the judgment of the Spanish Court of Appeal of les Illes Balears (Section IV) number 37/2018 of 14 th June

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 764
Author(s):  
María González Marimón
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Psychiatric Illness ◽  
Hague Convention ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
International Child ◽  
Psychological Harm ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Hague Convention ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Resumen: Sustracción ilícita internacional a España de dos menores residentes en Reino Unido en aplicación del Reglamento Bruselas II bis y el Convenio de La Haya de 1980 sobre los aspectos civiles de la sustracción internacional de menores. Discusión sobre si la enfermedad psiquiátrica de la madre constituye un riesgo de peligro físico o psíquico en caso de retorno de los menores, en los términos de la excepción al retorno del artículo 13 b del Convenio de La Haya de 1980.Palabras clave: sustracción internacional de menores, Reglamento Bruselas II bis, Convenio de La Haya de 1980, excepciones al retorno del menor, excepción del artículo 13 b.Abstract: International child abduction to Spain of two minors residing in United Kingdom under the Brussels II Regulation and the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduc­tion of 1980. Discussion about if the psychiatric illness of the mother is considered as a risk of physical or psychological harm in case of return of the minors, in terms of the article 13 b return exception of the 1980 Hague Convention.Keywords: international child abduction, Brussels II bis Regulation, 1980 Hague Convention, exceptions to the return of the minor, article 13 b exception.

scholarly journals Sustracción internacional de menores. Asunto vinculado con Suiza y España. Comentario de la sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra (Sección 1ª) núm. 52/2018, de 17 de abril = International child abduction. Case related with Switzerland and Spain. Comment on the judgment of the Spanish Court of Appeal of Pontevedra (Section 1) number 52/2018 of 17th April

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Carmen Azcárraga Monzonís
Keyword(s):  
Hague Convention ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Habitual Residence ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child ◽  
The Hague ◽  
A Minor ◽  
The Hague Convention ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Resumen: Sustracción internacional a España de menor residente en Suiza en aplicación del Con­venio de La Haya de 1980 sobre los aspectos civiles de la sustracción internacional de menores. Discre­pancia sobre la residencia habitual del menor. No se aprecian motivos de no retorno.Palabras clave: sustracción internacional de menores, Convenio de La Haya sobre sustracción, Convenio de La Haya sobre responsabilidad parental y protección de menores, residencia habitualAbstract: International abduction to Spain of a minor residing in Switzerland under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 1980. Discrepancy about the habi­tual residence of the minor. No grounds for return denial are appreciated.Keywords: international child abduction, Hague Convention on Child Abduction, Hague Conven­tion on Parental Responsibility and Measures of the Protection of Children, habitual residence

scholarly journals Sustracción internacional de menores y Convenio de la Haya de 1980. Comentario de la sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Las Palmas (Sección 3ª) núm. 377/2017, De 29 de junio = Child abduction and the Hague Convention on 1980. Comment on the judgment of the Spanish Court of Appeal of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Section 3) number 377/2017 of 29th june

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 795
Author(s):  
Carmen Azcárraga Monzonís ◽  
Pablo Quinzá Redondo
Keyword(s):  
Hague Convention ◽  
Gran Canaria ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child ◽  
The Hague ◽  
A Minor ◽  
The Hague Convention ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Resumen: Sustracción internacional a España de menor residente en Argentina en aplicación del Convenio de La Haya de 1980 sobre los aspectos civiles de la sustracción internacional de menores.Palabras clave: sustracción internacional de menores, Convenio de La Haya sobre sustracción, derecho de custodia, filiación.Abstract: International abduction to Spain of a minor residing in Argentina under the Hague Con­vention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 1980.Keywords: International child abduction, Hague Convention on Child Abduction, rights of custo­dy, filiation.

The Hague Convention on Child Abduction of 1980 and Its Implementation in Finland

1997 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-166
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Hague Convention ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Hague Convention ◽  
Court Of Appeal

AbstractFinland ratified the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in 1994. The Convention was implemented by making use of the so-called transformation techniques, i.e. by drafting and adopting Finnish internal law provisions deemed to be necessary for the proper implementation of the international obligations under the Hague Convention. The overall aim of the implementation provisions has been to make the practical application of the Convention as effective and speedy as possible and for this purpose to go even further than necessarily required. The most important features of these national arrangements are the following: – The Hague Convention rules on the return of an abducted child have been made retroactive. – Only one court, the Court of Appeal of Helsinki, is competent to receive applications and make orders for the return of children. Besides, an order for the return is always immediately enforceable, unless the Supreme Court, upon appeal, orders the stay of enforcement. – The `fundamental principles' exception in Article 20 of the Convention cannot be invoked against the application in Finnish return proceedings. According to Article 20 the return of the child can be refused where the return would not be permitted by the fundamental principles relating to the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms of the requested State. The first cases indicate that the retroactive application of the Convention provided by the Finnish Act has been less successful. The courts have shown obvious reluctance towards the ordering of the return in these cases whereas in the `new' cases the Court of Appeal as well as the Supreme Court have generally followed the spirit of the Convention in a loyal manner.

10. International Relocation and Child Abduction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Gaffney-Rhys
Keyword(s):  
Hague Convention ◽  
International Relocation ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child ◽  
Questions And Answers ◽  
Essay Question ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Hague Convention ◽  
The Eu

The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam and assignment questions. Each book includes key debates, typical questions, diagram answer plans, suggested answers, author commentary, and tips to gain extra marks. This chapter focuses on international relocation and child abduction. The first question is an essay question that considers the law relating to international relocation, ie how the English courts have dealt with applications to relocate out of the jurisdiction (eg Payne v Payne). The second is a problem question that requires the application of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects on International Child Abduction 1980 and the EU Regulations (BIIR), but also considers the law that applies if a child is taken to England and Wales from a country that has not ratified the Hague Convention.

Deciding to Defer: The Importance of Fairness in Resolving Transnational Jurisdictional Conflicts

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asif Efrat ◽  
Abraham L. Newman
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Hague Convention ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Domestic Institutions ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
International Child ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Hague Convention ◽  
Considerable Support

AbstractThe cross-border movement of people, goods, and information frequently results in legal disputes that come under the jurisdiction of multiple states. The principle of deference—acceptance of another state's exercise of legal authority—is one mechanism to manage such jurisdictional conflicts. Despite the importance of deference in international law and cooperation, little is known about the causes of variation in its use. In this article, we develop a theory of deference that focuses on the role that domestic institutions and norms play in ensuring procedural and substantive fairness. We test this theory in an original data set concerning accession practices in the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Our findings offer considerable support for the idea that states evaluate partners on the likelihood that they can offer a fair legal process. Exploring empirically the efforts against parental child abduction, we offer a nuanced account of the link between domestic institutions and norms and international cooperation. This account suggests that greater attention should be paid to the use of deference as a mechanism to manage the conflicts posed by globalization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document