scholarly journals Crisis familiar, responsabilidad parental y alimentos: revisando las cuestiones generales en un divorcio transnacional (Audiencia Provincial Barcelona - Sentencia de 15/04/2019) = Crisis of the couple, parental responsabilit and maintenance: reviewing core matters in a cross-border family judgement (Barcelona Court of Appeal - Decision of 15/04/2019)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 784
Author(s):  
Marina Vargas Gómez-Urrutia
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
International Jurisdiction ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
El Sistema ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Resumen: La interacción entre las normas de competencia judicial internacional y las cuestiones de fondo que resuelven las normas de conflicto en las distintas materias del derecho de familia constitu­yen un problema específico en los divorcios con elementos transfronterizo. En la SAP Barcelona de 15 de abril de 2019 se pone a prueba el sistema de competencia judicial internacional y de ley aplicable a raíz de una acción principal de divorcio donde, además, se han de establecer medidas de responsabilidad parental y fijar la obligación de alimentos.Palabras clave: competencia judicial internacional, ley aplicable, litigios transfronterizos: di­vorcio, responsabilidad parental, obligación de alimentos.Abstract: In family law matters specific issues raises from the interaction between the rules on international jurisdiction and applicable law. The Decision of the Barcelona Court of Appeal rended on April 15, 2019 tests the international jurisdiction system and the issues of applicable law in a cross-bor­der family litigation where a main divorce must be established in addition with parental responsibility measures and maintenance claims.Keywords: International jurisdiction, applicable law, cross-border UE family law: divorce, pa­rental responsability disputes, Maintenance claims.

scholarly journals Una incorrecta articulación de las fuentes normativas de competencia judicial internacional en materia de responsabilidad parental: sentencia de la AP de A Coruña (Sección 4ª) núm. 119/2018, de 4 de abril = An improper enumeration of internatioanl jurisdiction sources on parental responsability matters: the judgment of the Spanish Court of Appeal of A Coruña (Section 4) number 119/2018, of 4 th April

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 773
Author(s):  
Saioa Goyeneche Echeverria
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Hague Convention ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Conventional System ◽  
European Regulation ◽  
International Jurisdiction ◽  
El Sistema ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Resumen: Desde la incorporación en el ordenamiento jurídico español de normas convencionales y de la Unión Europea, la configuración del sistema de competencia judicial internacional aplicable por los jueces y tribunales españoles en materia de responsabilidad parental incluye tres bloques normativos potencialmente aplicables: la legislación europea, representada por el Reglamento “Bruselas II bis”; el sistema convencional, representado por el Convenio de La Haya, de 19 de octubre de 1996; y la legis­lación interna o autónoma española, representada por la LOPJ. Como se muestra en este comentario jurisprudencial, la complejidad del sistema plantea el desafío del correcto manejo de las fuentes.Palabras clave: responsabilidad parental, Reglamento “Bruselas II bis”,  Convenio de La Haya de 199,  Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial, normas de competencia judicial internacional.Abstract: Since conventional and EU rules have been integrated into the Spanish legal system, the configuration of international jurisdiction system on parental responsibility be applied by Spanish judges and courts of law rests on three normative blocks: European regulation, represented by “Brussels II bis” Regulation; conventional system, represented by the 1996 Hague Convention; and internal laws, represented by the Organic Law of Judicial Power. This comment shows us that the system’s complexity raises the challenge of a correct handling of sources.Keywords: parental responsibility, “Brussels II bis” Regulation, The 1996 Hague Convention,  The Organic Law of Judicial Power, rules on international jurisdiction.

scholarly journals Odlučivanje o imovinskim odnosima bračnih drugova u ostavinskim postupcima sukladno Uredbi 2016/1103 o bračnoimovinskom režimu

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 449-471
Author(s):  
Paula Poretti
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Member States ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
International Couples ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Council Regulation ◽  
Property Regimes ◽  
European Family ◽  
Open Issues

Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes (hereinafter: Regulation 2016/1103) provides for uniform rules which should facilitate delivering of judgments concerning matrimonial property in cross-border disputes in 18 Member States which established enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of the property regimes of international couples. The application of the Regulation 2016/1103 should contribue to the application of other european instruments in the fi eld of european family law in divorce and succession proceedings. The paper presents rules on jurisdiction and applicable law under the Regulation 2016/1103 which should be applied in proceedings concerning matrimonial property regimes. Application of the provisions of Regulation 2016/1103 on jurisdiction and applicable law in proceedings for succession will be analyzed. The paper elaborates on certain potentially problematic solutions and open issues revealed through interpretation of provisions of Regulation 2016/1103 which could cause doubts and uncertainties for the court and public notaries. Possible solutions which could remove diffi culties and insuffi ciencies in the application of the Regulation 2016/1103 will be suggested.

21. The 1996 Hague Convention on the Protection of Children

2021 ◽  
pp. 798-812
Author(s):  
N V Lowe ◽  
G Douglas ◽  
E Hitchings ◽  
R Taylor
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Hague Convention ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Different Cultures

Many relationships are now transnational ones between parties from different cultures and countries. The breakdown of these relationships means that increasing numbers of children are caught up in cross-border disputes. Such disputes raise a variety of issues, including which court should hear any question concerning the children’s upbringing, what happens if each parent brings separate proceedings at the same time, and about the enforceability of orders, for example that a parent living in one country should see their child in another country. Now that the UK has left the European Union the key international instrument for dealing with these issues is the 1996 Hague Convention on the Protection of Children which provides basic rules of jurisdiction for hearing cases concerning children and a consequential system of recognition and enforcement of decisions concerning parental responsibility. This chapter discusses the following aspects of the 1996 Convention: its aims, scope, the jurisdictional rules, applicable law with regard to parental responsibility, recognition and enforcement, the placement of children abroad and safeguarding rights of access.

scholarly journals Mimosmluvní závazkové poměry s mezinárodním prvkem z pohledu české autonomní úpravy

AUC IURIDICA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
Kateřina Holečková
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
International Level ◽  
International Jurisdiction ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Contractual Obligations ◽  
Border Elements

Private International Law is nowadays, to a large extent, regulated by European and international law and the scope of the application of autonomous national law is therefore limited. However, in case of non-contractual obligations with cross-border elements, this scope is still relatively broad, as certain matters are excluded from the regulation on the European and international level. The aim of this article is to analyze the regulation of non-contractual obligations with cross-border elements under the Czech Act on Private International law, namely its regulation of international jurisdiction, applicable law, and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements.

scholarly journals La errónea determinación de la competencia judicial internacional cuando los hijos residen en estados miembros diferentes: sentencia de la AP de Lugo nº 44/2018, de 11 de abril de 2018 = The wrong determination of the international jurisdiction when the children have the habitual residence in different member states: the judgment of the Spanish Court of Appeal of Lugo, number 44 /2018, of 11th april 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 870
Author(s):  
Idoia Otaegui Aizpurua
Keyword(s):  
Parental Responsibility ◽  
Habitual Residence ◽  
Member States ◽  
International Jurisdiction ◽  
The Common ◽  
The One ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Resumen: La determinación de la correcta competencia judicial internacional en procedimientos relativos a la responsabilidad parental, reviste una relevancia especial por las consecuencias finales que dicha determinación tiene sobre los menores, principales destinatarios de las medidas que los tribunales competentes adoptarán sobre ellos. Si a ello le añadimos una situación de residencia habitual en Estados miembros diferentes y de litispendencia internacional, la complejidad del caso aumenta. Afortunadamente, las disposiciones comunes del Reglamento Bruselas II bis establecen unos criterios claros para la solución de los conflictos de competencia como el planteado en el caso objeto de análisis.Palabras clave: Reglamento “Bruselas II bis”. Litispendencia. Competencia judicial internacional. Responsabilidad parental. Residencia habitual del menor.Abstract: The determination of the proper international jurisdiction in proceedings related to parental responsibility is particularly relevant due to the final consequences that this determination has on minors, main addressees of the measures that the competent courts will adopt on them. If we add to this a situation of habitual residence in different Member States and an international lis pendens foreclosure, the complexity of the case increases. Fortunately, the common rules of the Brussels II bis Regulation set clear criteria for the resolution of conflicts of competence such as the one raised in the case under analysis.Keywords: “Brussels II bis” Regulation. Lis pendens. International jurisdiction. Parental responsibility. Habitual residence of the child.

Fracturing Constitutional Rights: The Prosecution of Alleged Broadcast Infringers in Nigeria

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Bankole Sodipo
Keyword(s):  
Civil Liability ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
Written Law ◽  
Court Of Appeal ◽  
Material Form

Abstract Infringement of broadcasts is often treated as a crime. The Nigerian Constitution guarantees that no-one can be prosecuted for any act that is not prescribed in a written law. Section 20 of Nigeria's Copyright Act only criminalizes dealing with infringing copies. A “copy” is defined in terms of material form. An infringing broadcast therefore connotes a recorded broadcast or a copy of a broadcast. This article argues that, statutorily, not every act that gives rise to civil liability for broadcast copyright infringement constitutes a crime. The article reviews the first broadcast copyright prosecution Court of Appeal decision in Eno v Nigerian Copyright Commission. Eno was unlawfully prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned. The article seeks to stem the wave of prosecutions on the type of charges used in Eno. In the absence of law reform, the prosecutions based on the line of charges in Eno constitute a fracturing of constitutional rights.

Causing or inciting sexual activity with persons who have a mental disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (21) ◽  
pp. 1258-1259
Author(s):  
Richard Griffith
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Sexual Activity ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Sexual Offences ◽  
Senior Lecturer ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
Sexual Offences Act 2003 ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Richard Griffith, Senior Lecturer in Health Law at Swansea University, discusses the implications of a Court of Appeal decision that considers the scope of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 39, in relation to care workers

scholarly journals The Scope of Safety Warrants Under the Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
P Beverley
Keyword(s):  
Family Unit ◽  
The Family ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
Court Of Appeal

The Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989 ("CYPF Act") recognises that the interests of a child will be generally best served within the family unit. This recognition is subject to the qualification that a child should be removed from that unit whenever there is an unacceptable risk of harm to that child. This analysis will consider one mechanism provided by the Act to facilitate such removal, and the effect of the Court of Appeal decision in R v Kahu.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document