scholarly journals Regulação da Licença de Parentalidade em Pais de Crianças Muito Pré-termo

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Amorim ◽  
Elisabete Alves ◽  
Henrique Barros ◽  
Susana Silva
Keyword(s):  
Parental Leave ◽  
Infant Premature

<strong>Keywords:</strong> Infant, Premature; Parental Leave.

Parental leave and parents' well-being

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Heiligers
Keyword(s):  
Parental Leave ◽  
Well Being

The need for paid parental leave for federal employees: Adapting to a changing workforce: Executive summary

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Miller ◽  
Allison Suppan Helmuth ◽  
Robin Farabee-Siers
Keyword(s):  
Parental Leave ◽  
Federal Employees ◽  
Executive Summary ◽  
Paid Parental Leave

Share and care: Experiences of equal parental leave in Sweden

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lidbeck ◽  
T. Tjus ◽  
B. Wickberg
Keyword(s):  
Parental Leave

(De)coupled Parental Leave in South Korea: Focused on Duration on Leave and Path after Parental Leave

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-126
Author(s):  
Wontae Koh
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Parental Leave

Parental Leave of Absence: Time for the Next Step

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda D. Christ
Keyword(s):  
Parental Leave ◽  
Leave Of Absence

Mothers’ experiences using maternity and parental leave

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seohee Son
Keyword(s):  
Parental Leave ◽  
Mothers Experiences

‘Can’t Have It All’: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Effect of Parental Leave on Early-Career Wage Growth

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Kramer ◽  
Sunjin Pak ◽  
So Young Park
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Analysis ◽  
Parental Leave ◽  
Wage Growth ◽  
Early Career

Parental Leave: The Need for a National Policy to Foster Sexual Equality

1987 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-104
Author(s):  
Scott A. Caplan-Cotenoff
Keyword(s):  
Child Care ◽  
Parental Leave ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Working Women ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
Sexual Equality ◽  
Pregnancy Discrimination ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Leave Policy ◽  
The U.S

AbstractWorking women are without substantial protection from the ramifications of pregnancy discrimination, and the opportunities for working men to take leave from work to participate in child care are limited. Recently, private businesses have begun implementing maternity or parental leave policies to address these problems. These policies are inconsistent, however, and a national parental leave program is needed to help women attain equal access to jobs and to provide men with the opportunity to participate in child care.This Note examines the historical background of pregnancy discrimination litigation and legislation, and highlights the gaps in the protection currently afforded women. It suggests that a federal parental leave policy may expand the scope of this protection, and attempts to gain insight and draw conclusions from analogous parental leave programs in foreign countries which may be used as models for a national program in the U.S. Such a program would benefit parents, children, and society by removing some of the obstacles to sexual equality.

Understanding parental leave experiences: connecting the dots with a multiple-methods approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 512-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia M. Goodman ◽  
Dawn M. Richardson ◽  
Anna Steeves-Reece ◽  
Lisset Dumet Poma ◽  
Anna Plumb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parental Leave ◽  
Multiple Methods ◽  
Connecting The Dots

Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (November 2020-March 2021)

2021 ◽  
pp. 138826272110092
Author(s):  
Pauline Melin
Keyword(s):  
Parental Leave ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Framework Agreement ◽  
The Third ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
Rest Periods ◽  
First Case ◽  
Family Benefits ◽  
Grand Chamber ◽  
Italian Legislation

In this reporting period (November 2020-March 2021), five cases will be presented. The first case is INPS v WS (C-302/19), dealing with the Italian legislation that excludes Single Permit holders from receiving family benefits for their family members residing in a third country. In the second report, two cases rendered on the same day by the Grand Chamber of the Court are discussed. In D.J. v Radiotelevizija Slovenija (C-344/19) and RJ v Stadt Offenbach am Main (C-580/19), the Court clarified the circumstances under which periods of stand-by time could be considered as ‘working time’ or, alternatively, ‘rest periods’ under Directive 2003/88. XI v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants (C-129/20) is the third case reported. It concerns an interpretation of the Framework Agreement on parental leave in the light of the Luxembourg legislation, which requires parents to be employed at the time of their child’s birth to benefit from parental leave. Finally, the case report ends with VL v Szpital Kliniczny im. dra J. Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie (C-16/19), a case of discrimination on grounds of disability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document