An investigation on determining optimum wall ratio–cost relationship of shear walled reinforced concrete buildings

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
İbrahim Hakkı Erkan ◽  
Talha Polat Doğan ◽  
Musa Hakan Arslan
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Construction Cost ◽  
Frame Structures ◽  
Structural Systems ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Shear Forces ◽  
Concrete Wall ◽  
Wall Structures

Reinforced concrete walls are very efficient structural elements in terms of carrying the lateral loads that are expected to affect the structures during the service of the buildings. These elements, which are not used for economic reasons in buildings designed in areas with low seismic hazard, can actually provide a significant increase in performance with a very small increase in construction cost. In this study, a total of 9 building models have been created and the relationship between optimum reinforced concrete wall ratio and cost on these buildings has been investigated. The design and analysis of the models were carried out according to the criteria specified in TSC 2018. Three different structural systems specified in TSC 2018 were used in the designed models. These structural systems used; RC frame structures, RC wall-frame structures and RC wall structures. These structures were analyzed by Response Spectrum Method which is linear analysis method and base shear forces were obtained. Then, push-over analysis, which is a nonlinear analysis method, was applied to obtain the base shear forces that the structure can actually carry. After the analysis, the quantities of materials to be used for the construction of the structural systems of the models were calculated and current manufacturing prices and rough costs were calculated. In order to compare the obtained costs with the structural performances, nonlinear shear forces and linear shear forces ratios were calculated and the over strength factors were calculated for each model. In the light of the data obtained from the studies in the literature, when the over strength factors and cost values are examined together, it is concluded that the optimum design for the conditions specified in TSC 2018 will be provided with the RC wall ratio between 0.001 - 0.0016. It is concluded that lateral load carrying capacity of construction increases up to 650% by increasing the construction cost by 17% for the designed models.

Comparison of equivalent seismic load and response spectrum methods according to TSC 2018 and TSC 2007

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
İbrahim Hakkı Erkan ◽  
Talha Polat Doğan
Keyword(s):  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Seismic Load ◽  
Structural Systems ◽  
Seismic Loads ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Response Spectrum Method ◽  
Shear Forces ◽  
Linear Dynamic ◽  
Spectrum Method

In this study, two different analysis methods were compared; the first is a linear static analysis method and the second is a linear dynamic analysis method. First one is the Equivalent Seismic Load Method, which is a linear static method where seismic loads can be obtained by applying a simple calculation. The second method, the Response Spectrum method, is a linear dynamic analysis method which obtains the seismic loads using more complex statistical calculations. For this analysis study, 18 structural models with 3 different building heights were analyzed according to the conditions of Equivalent Seismic Load Method and Response Spectrum Method specified in both TSC 2007 and TSC 2018 and base shear forces obtained as a result of these analyzes were compared. As a result of analysis; compared to the results obtained from TSC 2007, due to the effective stiffness coefficients specified in TSC 2018, it was observed that the base shear forces obtained for both methods were lower and the modal period values were longer in the analyzes applied according to TSC 2018. This means that the structural systems created with the designs according to TSC 2018 are more ductile than the structural systems created with the designs made according to TSC 2007. Base shear forces obtained by 2 different analysis methods applied according to regulations stated in both TSC 2018 and TSC 2007; it was observed that the base shear forces obtained by the Equivalent Seismic Load Method were higher than the results of the Response Spectrum Method.

A proposal for the compatibility of static and dynamic seismic base shear provisions of the National Building Code

1982 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. K. Tso
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Shear Wall ◽  
Masonry Wall ◽  
Building Code ◽  
Frame Structures ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Significant Discrepancy ◽  
Moment Resisting Frame ◽  
Wall Structures ◽  
Moment Resisting

A comparison is made, based on static and dynamic base shear calculations according to the National Building Code of Canada of 1980, for four types of simple structures, namely, uniform moment resisting frame structures, uniform ductile flexural wall structures, uniform reinforced concrete shear wall structures, and unreinforced masonry wall structures. It is shown that a significant discrepancy exists between the static and dynamic base shear values, depending on the type and the fundamental period of the structure. The causes for the discrepancy and the necessity to make static and dynamic base shears compatible are discussed.

scholarly journals Seismic Behavior of Mid-Rise Precast Reinforced Concrete Building with Effect of Joints and Supports

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 3633-3637
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Precast Concrete ◽  
Mode Shapes ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Building ◽  
Axial Forces ◽  
Building Models ◽  
Precast Buildings ◽  
Concrete Building

Precast concrete structures are widely used in construction. It consists of prefabricated elements casted in industry and connected to each other to form a homogeneous structure. Connections function is to transfer moments and axial forces. Many engineers assume precast connection as pinned, but in reality, they are semi-rigid connections that transfer forces to other members. Lack of design and detailing of connection leads to improper behaviour of the structure, which then leads to the collapse of the building. Past earthquake studies show that many precast buildings performed poorly, and the main reasons were connections. This paper mainly focuses on understanding the seismic behaviour of mid-rise i.e seven-storey precast reinforced concrete buildings with various beam-column joints i.e rigid, semi-rigid, pinned and column-base supports i.e, fixed and hinged supports. Building is modelled and analyzed using ETABS v17 software. Rotational stiffness of precast billet connection is adopted for modelling of semi-rigid beam-column connections. Response spectrum and modal analysis are carried out. Results of displacements, storey drift, storey shear, storey stiffness, base shear, time periods and first mode shapes of models are discussed. It is observed, precast reinforced concrete building models with semi rigid connection performs better than building models with pinned connections and building models with fixed supports reduces the structural response to a great extent.

Study on Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Masonry High-Rise Building

2012 ◽  
Vol 166-169 ◽  
pp. 2164-2170
Author(s):  
Xu Jie Sun ◽  
Hou Zhang ◽  
Da Gang Lu ◽  
Feng Lai Wang
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Time History ◽  
Time History Analysis ◽  
Masonry Building ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Concrete Masonry ◽  
History Analysis ◽  
Earthquake Action

The design process of the 100 m high reinforced concrete masonry building in China was firstly presented, deformation check calculation under earthquake action by mode-superposition response spectrum method and time-history analysis method were detailed and deformation under wind load was also checked. Then elastic-plastic deformation under earthquake action was checked by time-history analysis method and pushover analysis method with both under uniform load and reverse triangle load. The conclusion is construct 100 m high office building built in Fortification intensity 6 by reinforced concrete masonry is feasible. Then the building was redesigned as built in fortification 7, the same check was performed as that have been done in fortification 6, it is feasible too.

scholarly journals Backstay Effect of Diaphragm in Tall Building

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1578-1587
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Tall Building ◽  
Structural Systems ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
High Rise ◽  
Structural Engineer ◽  
Structural Responses ◽  
Seismic Forces

Seismic analysis of structural systems with floor diaphragms has been a requisite in the recent past. The duty of a structural engineer is to be prudent about the behavior of every structural system adopted. Amongst the structural systems that are adopted world over, diaphragm with rigid and semi-rigid floor plate are adopted widely in the analysis. This research focuses on the backstay effect i.e. podium structural interaction with the tower area and consideration of retaining wall as increment of lateral stiffness as specified in latest tall building code IS6700:2016 for low and high rise structures. In the current study models were prepared with low to high rise storeys with rigid and flexible diaphragms considering backstay diaphragm placing tower at center and corner. The models were subjected to seismic forces; response spectrum along with the combination of the gravity loads. The structural responses like natural periods, base shear, displacement and inter storey drift were also studied.

scholarly journals Seismic resistance of multi-storey reinforced concrete wall-frame structures at destructive earthquakes

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1582
Author(s):  
Baisbay T. Yerimbetov ◽  
Berik M. Chalabayev ◽  
Yairakhan B. Kunanbayeva ◽  
Zhenisbek A. Ussenkulov ◽  
Zhenis I. Orazbayev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Frame Structures ◽  
Seismic Resistance ◽  
Concrete Wall ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Wall

scholarly journals Performance Prediction Equations for Linear Planar Structural Systems: Concept, Formulation, and Validation

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 697-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta De Bortoli ◽  
Farzin Zareian
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Performance Prediction ◽  
Epicentral Distance ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Accurate Estimate ◽  
Structural Systems ◽  
Prediction Equations ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Earthquake Parameters ◽  
Ground Motion Model

This paper presents and validates an analytical formulation, denoted as Performance Prediction Equations (PPEs), that relates the seismic response engineering demand parameter (EDP) of buildings to earthquake parameters such as magnitude, epicentral distance, and type of faulting. PPEs are conceptually novel and can be readily included in any hazard calculation program to directly estimate EDP hazard curves. The PPEs presented herein are based on the linearization of response spectrum analysis (RSA) formulation for estimation of the seismic response of multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) models for planar structural systems. Equations for mean and variance are provided for floor displacement, interstory drift ratio, and normalized base shear. The input parameters needed to apply the proposed PPEs are the modal properties of the structural system and the selection of an existing ground motion model (GMM). The proposed PPEs are validated against simulated results using a set of planar building models and the Campbell-Bozorgnia 2014 GMM. The comparison confirms that the proposed PPEs provide an accurate estimate of the statistics of the said EDPs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document