scholarly journals Idolatria ou demonização: o que os candidatos do ENEM pensam do Estado?

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 345
Author(s):  
Adriano Oliveira ◽  
Carlos Gadelha
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Secondary Education ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Rio De Janeiro ◽  
The State ◽  
Opinion Survey ◽  
Public Opinion Survey ◽  
Brazilian Society ◽  
Brazilian State ◽  
Brazilian Students

ResumoEste artigo tem o objetivo de responder a seguinte indagação: Os estudantes brasileiros, candidatos ao Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem), idolatram o Estado ou o demonizam? Esta indagação surge em razão do profícuo debate ente Melo (2016) e Souza (2015; 2016) sobre a demonização ou não do Estado na sociedade brasileira. Como tal debate carece de dados empíricos, buscamos, inicialmente, em Almeida (2007) e Lamounier e Souza (2010) argumentos para responder a indagação proposta. Porém, os argumentos dos autores citados nos conduzem a interpretar as opiniões dos candidatos do Enem. Pesquisa de opinião pública realizada entre estes candidatos nos conduzem a resposta ao problema proposto.Palavras-chave: Estado brasileiro. Idolatria. Demonização. Candidatos ao Enem.AbstractThis article aims to answer the following question: Brazilian students, candidates for the National Secondary Education Examination (Enem), idolize or demonize State? This question arises from the fruitful debate being Melo (2016) and Souza (2015; 2016) about the demonization or not the State in Brazilian society. As such debate lacks empirical data, we sought initially in Almeida (2007) and Lamounier and Souza (2010) arguments to answer the question proposed. However, the arguments of these authors lead us to interpret the opinions of candidates Enem. Public opinion survey conducted among these candidates lead in the response to the proposed problem.Keywords: Brazilian state. Idolatry. Demonization. Enem candidates.ResumenEn este artículo se pretende dar respuesta a la siguiente pregunta: estudiantes brasileños, los candidatos para el Examen Nacional de Enseñanza Media (ENEM), idolatran o demonizan Estado? Esta pregunta surge de la discusión fructífera siendo Melo (2016) y Souza (2015; 2016) sobre la demonización o no del Estado en la sociedad brasileña. Como tal debate carece de datos empíricos, hemos tratado inicialmente en Almeida (2007) y Lamounier y Souza (2010) argumentos para responder a la cuestión propuesta. Sin embargo, los argumentos de estos autores nos llevan a interpretar las opiniones de los candidatos Enem. encuesta de opinión pública realizada entre estos candidatos plomo en la respuesta al problema propuesto.Palabras clave: estado brasileño. La idolatría. Demonización. Enem candidatos. Referências ALMEIDA, Alberto. A cabeça do brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2007.MELO, Marcus André. Raízes de um Brasil político: os caminhos de um projeto iliberal. Folha de S. Paulo, 31 jan. 2016.MENDES, Marcos. Por que o Brasil cresce pouco?: desigualdade, democracia e baixo crescimento no Brasil do futuro. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2014.SOUZA, Amaury de; LAMOUNIER, Bolívar. A classe média brasileira: ambições, valores e projetos de sociedade. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010.SOUZA, Jesse. A tolice da inteligência brasileira: ou como o país se deixa manipular pela elite. São Paulo: LeYa, 2015.______. Jesse. A quem serve a classe média indignada? Folha de S. Paulo, 10 jan. 2016. 

Perception of Traffic Noise Barrier Effectiveness: Public Opinion Survey of Residents Living near I-71

1997 ◽  
Vol 1601 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd A. Herman ◽  
Michael A. Finney ◽  
Craig M. Clum ◽  
E.W. Pinckney
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Traffic Noise ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
Opinion Survey ◽  
Noise Barriers ◽  
Noise Abatement ◽  
Public Controversy ◽  
Public Opinion Survey ◽  
Project Area ◽  
Noise Barrier

The completion of the largest Ohio Department of Transportation traffic noise abatement project in 1995 was met with public controversy over the effectiveness of the noise barriers. A public opinion survey was designed to obtain the perceptions of the residents in the project area. In a departure from most surveys of traffic noise barrier effectiveness, the coverage was not limited to the first or second row of houses, but was extended to 800 m on each side of the roadway. It was found that the larger survey area was needed to avoid misleading conclusions. Overall perceptions of noise barrier effectiveness were found to vary with distance from the roadway and with noise barrier configuration.

Testing the Effects of Paired Issue Statements on the Seven-Point Issue Scales

1993 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 61-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Jacoby
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
Psychological Distance ◽  
National Election ◽  
Opinion Survey ◽  
Question Format ◽  
Public Opinion Survey ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Political Controversy ◽  
Election Studies

Many recent empirical analyses of citizens' issue attitudes rely on the seven-point issue scales, which have been included in all of the biennial National Election Studies (NES) since 1968. The question format used to create these scales requires people to respond to two different issue statements simultaneously. While this approach has a number of practical advantages, it may also distort the measurement of issue attitudes in several ways. In order to examine this possibility, a 1990 South Carolina public-opinion survey had people respond to the separate issue statements. The empirical results lead to an optimistic assessment of the seven-point scales. People do seem to regard the paired issue statements in any of the seven-point questions as the opposite sides of a political controversy. This general conclusion has some important caveats: there are several distinct dimensions underlying citizens' issue judgments, and the degree of psychological distance between conflicting issue positions varies somewhat across issues. These findings have important implications for our understanding and measurement of citizens' issue attitudes.

Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 1355-1363.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malinda S. Lee ◽  
Leslie V. Farland ◽  
Stacey A. Missmer ◽  
Elizabeth S. Ginsburg
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Opinion Survey ◽  
Public Opinion Survey
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document