BENEFICIAL USES OF WATER PRODUCED BY COAL BED NATURAL GAS DEVELOPMENT: MORE SURFACE WATER CAN BE GOOD FOR FROGS AND OTHER WILDLIFE

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (1) ◽  
pp. 845-864
Author(s):  
William E. Vetter ◽  
Kimberley Brown
Keyword(s):  
Surface Water ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Natural Gas Development ◽  
Beneficial Uses ◽  
Good For

A Review of the Potential Effects of Coal Bed Natural Gas Development Activities on Fish Assemblages of the Powder River Geologic Basin

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Windy N. Davis ◽  
Robert G. Bramblett ◽  
Alexander V. Zale ◽  
Carol L. Endicott
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Fish Assemblages ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Natural Gas Development

scholarly journals Soil Erosion and Surface Water Quality Impacts of Natural Gas Development in East Texas, USA

Water ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 944-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew McBroom ◽  
Todd Thomas ◽  
Yanli Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Surface Water ◽  
Soil Erosion ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Surface Water Quality ◽  
East Texas ◽  
Natural Gas Development

Response of mule deer to habitat modification near natural gas development

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Van Dyke ◽  
Autumn Fox ◽  
Seth M. Harju ◽  
Matthew R. Dzialak ◽  
Larry D. Hayden-Wing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Mule Deer ◽  
Habitat Modification ◽  
Natural Gas Development

scholarly journals Responses of Vertebrate Wildlife to Oil and Natural Gas Development: Patterns and Frontiers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Chalfoun
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Anthropogenic Activities ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Habitat Type ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Natural Gas Development ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Oil And Natural Gas

Abstract Purpose of Review Anthropogenic activities can lead to the loss, fragmentation, and alteration of wildlife habitats. I reviewed the recent literature (2014–2019) focused on the responses of avian, mammalian, and herpetofaunal species to oil and natural gas development, a widespread and still-expanding land use worldwide. My primary goals were to identify any generalities in species’ responses to development and summarize remaining gaps in knowledge. To do so, I evaluated the directionality of a wide variety of responses in relation to taxon, location, development type, development metric, habitat type, and spatiotemporal aspects. Recent Findings Studies (n = 70) were restricted to the USA and Canada, and taxonomically biased towards birds and mammals. Longer studies, but not those incorporating multiple spatial scales, were more likely to detect significant responses. Negative responses of all types were present in relatively low frequencies across all taxa, locations, development types, and development metrics but were context-dependent. The directionality of responses by the same species often varied across studies or development metrics. Summary The state of knowledge about wildlife responses to oil and natural gas development has developed considerably, though many biases and gaps remain. Studies outside of North America and that focus on herpetofauna are lacking. Tests of mechanistic hypotheses for effects, long-term studies, assessment of response thresholds, and experimental designs that isolate the effects of different stimuli associated with development, remain critical. Moreover, tests of the efficacy of habitat mitigation efforts have been rare. Finally, investigations of the demographic effects of development across the full annual cycle were absent for non-game species and are critical for the estimation of population-level effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document