scholarly journals Support group preferences for patients with head and neck cancer: cross-sectional survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Emma Charters ◽  
Merran Findlay ◽  
Jonathan Clark ◽  
Kate White
OTO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473974X2110477
Author(s):  
Flora Yan ◽  
Erika Rauscher ◽  
Amanda Hollinger ◽  
Mary Ann Caputo ◽  
John Ready ◽  
...  

Objective To evaluate the concerns and needs of patients and survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) in the COVID-19 era. Study Design Prospective cross-sectional survey. Setting Contact lists of 5 North American HNC advocacy groups. Methods A 14-question survey was distributed to the contact lists of 5 HNC advocacy groups evaluating patient and survivor needs and concerns related to their cancer care and COVID-19. Results There were 171 respondents, with 75% in the posttreatment period. The most common concern was contraction of COVID-19 (49%). More patients in active treatment preferred in-person visits than those in the early (≤5 years) and late (>5) survivorship period (72% vs 61% vs 40%, P < .001). A higher percentage of late survivors preferred virtual visits (38% vs 28%, P = .001). In total, 91 (53.2%) respondents sought emotional support outside of immediate family and friends. This included cancer support groups (36.2%), the medical team (29.7%), and other sources outside of these (34.1%), including faith-based organizations and online communities. A higher proportion of women than men (62% vs 41%, P = .001) were seeking emotional support outside of immediate family and friends. Conclusions During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with HNC who were actively undergoing treatment had increased need for support resources and preferred in-person provider visits. Alternatively, a higher percentage of patients >5 years from treatment preferred virtual visits. Emotional support outside of family and friends was sought out by a majority of respondents. Further research is needed to determine what support and educational resources are needed to best aid these various populations.


2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 412-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
N B Oozeer ◽  
S Owen ◽  
B Z Perez ◽  
G Jones ◽  
A R Welch ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroduction:Total laryngectomy affects patients' post-operative speech and swallowing functions. We aimed to assess these outcomes.Materials and methods:Patients' normalcy of diet, ability to eat in public and speech comprehensibility were assessed using the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer, in a cross-sectional survey of disease-free laryngectomees.Results and analysis:Seventy-nine laryngectomees (72 men and seven women), with a mean age of 64 years (range 37 to 96), were included. Mean scores were 81.6 (standard deviation 29.2) for normalcy of diet, 77.8 (standard deviation 30.2) for eating in public and 65.2 (standard deviation 23.5) for speech. Normalcy of diet achieved higher scores within six months of laryngectomy and remained stable. There was a statistically significant difference between scores for the speech and public eating domains, comparing patients less and more than six months post-laryngectomy. This trend was maintained beyond 12 months.Conclusions:In post-laryngectomy patients, Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer scores improved over time, especially those for the speech and public eating domains, reflecting increasing confidence in social interactions and familiarity with surgical voice restoration.


2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devendra A. Chaukar ◽  
Rohan R. Walvekar ◽  
Ashok K. Das ◽  
Mandar S. Deshpande ◽  
Prathamesh S. Pai ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Lim ◽  
A Ng ◽  
K S Loh

AbstractObjective:To determine the prevalence and profile of patients who use complementary and alternative medicine, within a cohort of head and neck cancer patients.Study design:Cross-sectional survey.Subjects and methods:Ninety-three consecutive head and neck cancer patients being followed up at the department of otolaryngology head and neck surgery were surveyed using an interviewer-administered questionnaire.Results:The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use was 67.8 per cent. Patients who used complementary and alternative medicine were more likely to be female, better educated and younger, compared with non-users. A total of 82.5 per cent (52/63) perceived complementary and alternative medicine to be effective, even though they were aware of the lack of research and endorsement by their physician regarding such medicine.Conclusion:The use of complementary and alternative medicine by head and neck cancer patients is common, regardless of efficacy or cost. Clinicians should routinely ask patients about their use of complementary and alternative medicine, to facilitate communication and enable appropriate use of such medicine.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 748-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wells ◽  
M. Cunningham ◽  
H. Lang ◽  
S. Swartzman ◽  
J. Philp ◽  
...  

Oral Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 740-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janne A. Väisänen ◽  
Anna-Maija H. Syrjälä ◽  
Paula R.O. Pesonen ◽  
Matti J. Pukkila ◽  
Petri T. Koivunen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 2463-2472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Wells ◽  
Samantha Swartzman ◽  
Heidi Lang ◽  
Margaret Cunningham ◽  
Lesley Taylor ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document