End to side anastomosis with a circular stapler for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy—how I do it

Background: Intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy plays an important role in minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. Intrathoracic anastomosis with robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (RAILE) includes hand-sewn and circular stapler methods, which remain technically challenging. In this study, we modified the techniques for intrathoracic anastomosis at RAILE, in order to simplify the complex procedures. Methods: “Side-insertion” technique was used for anvil placement and purse string suture for intrathoracic anastomosis at RAILE. Medical records for consecutive patients who had undergone robot-assisted minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer between January 2015 and June 2018 were analyzed. Results: A total of consecutive 31 patients were enrolled. There was no conversion to open thoracotomy in this cohort. Mean operation duration in the robotic group was 387.4 ± 68.2 min. Median estimated blood loss was 110 mL (range 50–400 mL). Two patients (6.5%) had postoperative anastomotic leak. No postoperative reoperation was needed and there were no mortality. Six patients (19.4%) had anastomotic stricture and 2 patients of them needed endoscopic dilation. Conclusion: RAILE is safe and feasible. Our modified procedure highlighting the “side-insertion” method may simplify the process of intrathoracic anvil placement and purse string suture for anastomosis at RAILE.

Download Full-text

Using the Hand-Sewn Purse-String Stapled Anastomotic Technique for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1660848 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 67 (07) ◽

pp. 578-584 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Bicheng Zhan ◽

Jian Chen ◽

Shaoming Du ◽

Yanzheng Xiong ◽

Jian Liu

Keyword(s):

Esophageal Cancer ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Anastomotic Stricture ◽

Circular Stapler ◽

Fixation Time ◽

Purse String ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Anastomotic Technique ◽

Open Esophagectomy ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Background Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) is increasingly being used in the treatment of middle or lower esophageal cancer. Hand-sewn purse-string stapled anastomosis is a classic approach in open esophagectomy. However, this procedure is technically difficult under thoracoscopy. The hardest part is delivering the anvil into the esophageal stump. Herein, we report an approach to performing this step under thoracoscopy. Methods A total of 257 consecutive patients who underwent MIILE between April 2013 and July 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The operator hand sewed the purse string using silk thread under thoracoscopy, and the 25-mm circular stapler was passed through the anterior axillary line at the fourth intercostal space to finish the side-to-end gastroesophageal anastomosis. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, postoperative complications were evaluated. Results The mean operative time, thoracoscopy time, and anvil fixation time was 307.0 ± 34.3, 155.4 ± 21.5, and 7.1 ± 1.6 minute, respectively. The anastomotic leak and anastomotic stricture occurred in 6.6% (17 of 257) and 3.9% (10 of 257) of patients, respectively. There was no intraoperative death; one case was death of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for conduit gastric leakage on the 21st postoperative day. Conclusion Using the hand-sewn purse-string stapled anastomotic technique for MIILE is feasible and relatively safe in patients with middle or lower esophageal cancer.

Download Full-text

A Prospective Study of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy With Regular Circular Stapler in Patients With Thoracic Esophageal Cancer

CHEST Journal ◽

10.1378/chest.1832357 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 145 (3) ◽

pp. 51A

Author(s):

Hecheng Li ◽

Longfei Ma ◽

Yiliang Zhang ◽

Yawei Zhang ◽

Jiaqing Xiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Esophageal Cancer ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Circular Stapler ◽

Thoracic Esophageal Cancer ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

A Prospective Study

Download Full-text

Indocyanine green perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Surgical Endoscopy ◽

10.1007/s00464-021-08346-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Keouna Pather ◽

Adeline M. Deladisma ◽

Christina Guerrier ◽

Isaac R. Kriley ◽

Ziad T. Awad

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Indocyanine Green ◽

Gastric Conduit ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

Perfusion Assessment

Download Full-text

792 OUTCOMES AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS HYBRID OR OPEN IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ESODATA STUDY GROUP.

Diseases of the Esophagus ◽

10.1093/dote/doab052.792 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Berend Van Der Wilk ◽

Eliza R C Hagens ◽

Ben M Eyck ◽

Suzanne S Gisbertz ◽

Richard Hillegersberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Anastomotic Leakage ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Mortality Data ◽

Study Group ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Open Esophagectomy ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

The Impact

Abstract To compare complications following totally minimally invasive (TMIE), laparoscopically assisted (hybrid) and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Three randomized trials have reported benefits for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Two studies compared TMIE versus open esophagectomy and another compared hybrid versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Only small retrospective studies compared TMIE with hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Methods Data were used from the International Esodata Study Group assessing patients undergoing TMIE, hybrid or open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Primary outcome was pneumonia, secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage, (major) complications, length of stay, escalation of care and 90-day mortality. Data were analyzed using multivariate multilevel models. Results In total, 4733 patients were included in this study (TMIE:1472, hybrid:1364 and open:1897). Patients undergoing TMIE had lower incidence of pneumonia compared to hybrid (10.9% vs 16.3%, Odds Ratio (OR):0.56, 95%CI: 0.40–0.80) and open esophagectomy (10.9% vs 17.4%, OR:0.60, 95%CI: 0.42–0.84) and had shorter length of stay (median 10 days (IQR 8–16)) compared to hybrid (14 (11–19), p = 0.041) and open esophagectomy (11 (9–16), p = 0.027). Patients undergoing TMIE had higher rate of anastomotic leakage compared to hybrid (15.1% vs 10.7%, OR:1.47, 95%CI: 1.01–2.13) and open esophagectomy (7.3%, OR:1.73, 95%CI: 1.26–2.38). No differences were reported between hybrid and open esophagectomy. Conclusion Compared to hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TMIE resulted in a lower pneumonia rate, a shorter hospital length of stay but a higher anastomotic leakage rate. The impact of these individual complications on survival and long-term quality of life should be further investigated.

Download Full-text