P-OGC68 Prophylactic Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy (EVT) following oesophagectomy

Background Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) is an emerging treatment strategy for the management of anastomotic leaks following oesophagectomy. However, patients are often critically unwell with mediastinitis and established sepsis by the time the leak is diagnosed. This results in a protracted recovery period regardless of the effectiveness of EVT in treating the leak. Prophylactic EVT to protect the anastomosis following oesophagectomy may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leak, and/or mediastinitis and sepsis if the anastomosis does fail. We report the outcomes of two patients considered high risk for anastomotic leak who were managed with prophylactic EVT following esophagectomy for cancer. Methods Two patients received prophylactic EVT following oesophagectomy between May and July 2021. The patients were considered high risk for anastomotic leak due to technical concerns with, or complications during, the operation. In both cases the oesophagogastric anastomosis (OGA) was fashioned with a circular stapler. The endoluminal vacuum device (EVD) was constructed using an 18F nasogastric tube and a piece of open cell foam, and placed intraluminally across the anastomosis under endoscopic guidance at the time of surgery. Continuous negative pressure (125mmHg) was applied. Information relating to treatment and outcome was recorded prospectively. Results Patient-1, a 72-year-old female, ASA 2, underwent minimally invasive oesophgectomy for an adenocarcinoma at the gastro-oesophageal junction. After creating the stapled OGA, inspection revealed the proximal (oesophageal) tissue doughnut was complete but attenuated. Patient 2, a 67-year-old male, ASA 3, underwent a hybrid Ivor Lewis oesophgectomy for a lower 1/3 oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surgery was complicated by significant intra-abdominal bleeding requiring blood transfusion and pressor support. In both cases, endoscopic assessment of the anastomosis following removal of the prophylactic EVD was performed day seven post-operatively. The anastomoses were healthy with no evidence of a leak, dehiscence, or early stricture formation. Conclusions In this limited case series, prophylactic EVT of the OGA following oesophagectomy was delivered safely with no complications related to insertion of the EVD or delivery of EVT. This intervention should be considered in cases where the risk of anastomotic leak is high. An intraluminal EVD situated across the OGA may minimise the extent of extraluminal contamination, and the systemic consequences of sepsis associated with this, should an anastomotic breakdown occur. Further studies are required to determine the safety of prophylactic EVT following oesophagectomy, and whether this improves surgical outcomes by reducing the incidence and impact of anastomotic leaks.

P-OGC47 Anastomotic stricture after Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy - An evaluation of incidence, risk factors and treatment

Background Anastomotic stricture is a recognised complication after oesophagectomy. It can impact the patient’s quality of life and may require recurrent dilatations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of benign strictures, contributing factors, and the long-term outcomes of management in patients undergoing oesophagectomy with thoracic anastomosis using a standardised circular stapler technique. Methods All patients who underwent a two-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy with curative intent between January 2010 and December 2019 at this single, high volume centre were included. All patients who underwent a stapled (circular) intrathoracic anastomosis using gastric conduits were included. Those with variations to anastomotic technique or those not having a transthoracic anastomosis were excluded to reduce heterogeneity. Patients who developed malignant anastomotic strictures and patients who died in hospital were excluded from the analysis. Benign stricture incidence, number of dilatations to resolve strictures, and refractory stricture rate were recorded and analysed. Results Overall, 705 patients were included with 192 (27.2%) developing benign strictures. Refractory strictures occurred in 38 patients (5.4%). One, two, and three dilatations were needed for resolution of symptoms in 46 (37.4%), 23 (18.7%), and 20 (16.3%) patients respectively. Multivariable analysis identified the occurrence of an anastomotic leak (OR 1.906, 95% CI 1.088-3.341, p = 0.024) and circular stapler size <28mm (OR 1.462, 95% CI 1.033-2.070, p = 0.032) as independent predictors of stricture occurrence. Patients with anastomotic leaks were more likely to develop refractory strictures (13.1% vs. 4.7%, OR 3.089, 95% CI 1.349-7.077, p = 0.008). Conclusions This study highlights that nearly 30% of patients having a circular stapled anastomosis will require dilatation after surgery for a benign anastomotic stricture. Although the majority will completely resolve after 2 dilatations, 5% will have longer-term problems with refractory strictures. Smaller circular stapler size and anastomotic leak have been identified as independent risk factors for developing a benign anastomotic stricture following oesophagectomy, and these patients should be monitored closely for symptomatology following surgery.

Anastomotic Troubleshooting

Anastomotic leak remains a critical and feared complication in colorectal surgery. The development of a leak can be catastrophic for a patient, resulting in overall increased morbidity and mortality. To help mitigate this risk, there are several ways to assess and potentially validate the integrity of a new anastomosis to give the patient the best chance of avoiding this postoperative complication. A majority of anastomoses will appear intact with no obvious sign of anastomotic dehiscence on gross examination. However, each anastomosis should be interrogated before the conclusion of an operation. The most common method to assess for an anastomotic leak is the air leak test (ALT). The ALT is a safe intraoperative method utilized to test the integrity of left-sided colon and rectal anastomoses and most importantly allows the ability to repair a failed test before concluding the operation. Additional troubleshooting is sometimes needed due to technical difficulties with the circular stapler. Problems, such as incomplete doughnuts and stapler misfiring, do occur and each surgeon should be prepared to address them.

Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes of Three-Dimensional Hand-Sewn Esophago-Jejunal Anastomosis in Completely Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Cancer

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is on the rise. One of the most technically demanding steps of the approach is the construction of esophago-jejunal anastomosis. Several laparoscopic anastomotic techniques have been described, like linear stapler side-to-side or circular stapler end-to-side anastomosis; limited data exist regarding hand-sewn esophago-jejunal anastomosis. The study took place between January 2018 and June 2021. Patients enrolled in this study were adults with proximal gastric or esophago-gastric junction Siewert type III tumors that underwent 3D-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy. A hand-sewn esophago-jejunal anastomosis was performed in all cases laparoscopically. Forty consecutive cases were performed during the study period. Median anastomotic suturing time was 55 min, with intra-operative methylene blue leak test being negative in all cases. Median operating time was 240 min, and there were no conversions to open. The anastomotic leak rate and postoperative stricture rate were zero. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were zero. Laparoscopic manual esophago-jejunal anastomosis utilizing a 3D platform in total gastrectomy for cancer can be performed with excellent outcomes regarding anastomotic leak and stricture rate. This anastomotic approach, although technically challenging, is safe and reproducible, with prominent results that can be disseminated in the surgical community.

309 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CERVICAL ANASTOMOSIS METHODS AND ANASTOMOSIS STRICTURE AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER

Esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection is the most important part of advanced esophageal cancer therapy, especially for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients. After esophagectomy, cervical anastomosis with gastric tube is required. However, some patients suffer anastomotic stenosis and require endoscopic balloon dilations. In this study, we investigated the relationship between cervical anastomosis methods and anastomosis stricture after esophagectomy for cancer patients. Methods Patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radical esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis were identified from the prospectively maintained database at our institution. From 2013 to 2019, 28 patients received esophagectomy with cervical lymph node dissection in our institution. Association between anastomotic methods, linear stapler vs circular stapler, and other factors (patient characteristics, surgical complications including anastomotic stenosis, and length of postoperative stay) were analyzed. Results Their average age was 63.3 years. Males and SCC cases predominated. Thirteen patients (46%) received cervical anastomosis with the circular stapler (Group C), and 11 patients (39%) received treatment with the linear stapler (Group L). None of the following variables were significant different between the two methods: preoperative chemotherapy (53.8% in group C vs. 45.5% in group L; p = 0.58), length of hospital stay (25.8 vs. 20.7 days; p = 0.15), pulmonary complications (16.7% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.36), and anastomotic leakage (33.3% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.24). However, the rate of anastomotic stenosis without malignancies was significantly higher in group C patients (66.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). Conclusion Cervical anastomosis with the linear stapler may be safer and associated with a lower stenosis rate than with the circular stapler. In future, cervical anastomosis with linear stapler after mediastinoscopic esophagectomy would be better for not only esophageal SCC patients but also esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma patients with pulmonary complications.

Application value of hand-sewn anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Background Digestive tract reconstruction in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy can be divided into two types: instrument anastomosis and hand-sewn anastomosis. This study explored the feasibility and safety of hand-sewn sutures in esophagojejunostomy of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, compared with instrument anastomosis using an overlap linear cutter. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 to January 2020 at one institution. The clinical data of 50 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy, with an average follow-up time of 12 months, were collected. The clinicopathologic data, short-term survival prognosis, and results of patients in the hand-sewn anastomosis (n=20) and the overlap anastomosis (n=30) groups were analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between the groups in sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, preoperative complications, abdominal operation history, tumor size, pTNM stage, blood loss, first postoperative liquid diet, exhaust time, or postoperative length of hospital stay. The hand-sewn anastomosis group had a significantly prolonged operation time (204±26.72min versus 190±20.90min, p=0.04) and anastomosis time (58±22.0min versus 46±15.97min, p=0.029), and a decreased operation cost (CNY 77,100±1700 versus CNY 71,900±1300, p<0.0001). Postoperative complications (dynamic ileus, abdominal infection, and pancreatic leakage) occurred in three patients (15%) in the hand-sewn anastomosis group and in four patients (13.3%) in the overlap anastomosis group (anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, dynamic ileus, and duodenal stump leakage). Conclusion The hand-sewn anastomosis method of esophagojejunostomy under totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy is safe and feasible and is an important supplement to linear and circular stapler anastomosis. It may be more convenient regarding obesity, a relatively high position of the anastomosis, edema of the esophageal wall, and short jejunal mesentery.