scholarly journals Expectation of the place of care and place of death of terminal cancer patients in Hong Kong: a hospital based cross-sectional questionnaire survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 4534-4546
Author(s):  
Nga Yan Yeung
2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siew Tzuh Tang ◽  
Ruth McCorkle

2008 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Saugo ◽  
Michele Pellizzari ◽  
Laura Marcon ◽  
Pierpaolo Benetollo ◽  
Roberto Toffanin ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e031057
Author(s):  
Mari Karikawa ◽  
Hisae Nakatani

ObjectiveHome-visit nurses play a key role in supporting the spouses of terminal cancer patients and encouraging positive perspectives of the caregiving experience. This study aimed to develop a scale to support nurses in self-assessing their practice around this important role.DesignCross-sectional questionnaire study.SettingThe Home Nursing Scale to Help Spousal Caregivers (HNS-HSC) questionnaire for self-assessment of home-visit nursing to spouses was developed based on interviews with spouses and literature reviews.ParticipantsOverall, 1500 home-visit nurses nationwide who had experience in supporting spousal caregivers and their patients in the predeath and postdeath periods were approached for participation.Main outcome measurePlanned exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess the underlying dimensions of the HNS-HSC; Cronbach’s α was used to determine the reliability. The Japanese version of Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale Form B (FAT-COD-B-J) and Grief Care scale were administered to assess convergent and discriminant validity.ResultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified 26 items on five factors: ‘helping spouses plan their futures’ ‘helping caregivers alleviate any regrets regarding their care’, ‘understanding the bond between a couple’, ‘providing support for anticipatory grief’, and ‘addressing spousal caregivers’ emotions after their spouses’ deaths’. The final model showed acceptable goodness-of-fit indices. The Cronbach’s α for the entire scale was 0.949 and exceeded 0.822 for each factor. The correlation coefficient with the FAT-COD-B-J, which served as an external validation, was 0.35. The correlation coefficients for the three grief care scales were 0.64, 0.45 and 0.72, respectively.ConclusionsThis scale is a reliable and valid tool for visiting nurses to self-assess their knowledge, skills and practice around helping spousal caregivers. By using this scale, it is expected to change nursing practice in pursuit of improving quality of life of spouses.


Author(s):  
Yan-Mei Dai ◽  
Ya-Ting Huang ◽  
Min-Yu Lai ◽  
Hsueh-Erh Liu ◽  
Chih-Chung Shiao

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Guk Jin Lee ◽  
Ji Hyun Gwak ◽  
Myoung Sim Kim ◽  
Mi Yeong Lee ◽  
Seo Ree Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The accurate estimation of expected survival in terminal cancer patients is important. The palliative performance scale (PPS) is an important factor in predicting survival of hospice patients. The purpose of this study was to examine how initial status of PPS and changes in PPS affect the survival of hospice patients in Korea. Method We retrospectively examined 315 patients who were admitted to our hospice unit between January 2017 and December 2018. The patients were divided based on the PPS of ≥50% (group A) and ≤40% (group B). We performed survival analysis for factors associated with the length of survival (LOS) in group A. Based on the hospice team's weekly evaluation of PPS, we examined the effect of initial levels and changes in group A on the prognosis of patients who survived for 2 weeks or more. Results At the time of admission to hospice, 265 (84.1%) patients were PPS ≥50%, and 50 (15.9%) were PPS ≤40%. The median LOS of PPS ≥50% and PPS ≤40% were 15 (2–158 days) and 9 (2–43 days), respectively. Male, gastrointestinal cancer, and lower initial PPS all predicted poor prognosis in group A. Male, gastrointestinal cancer, and a PPS change of 10% or greater, compared with initial status 1 week and 2 weeks of hospitalization, were all predictors of poor prognosis in group A patients who survived for 2 weeks or longer. Significance of results Our research demonstrates the significance of PPS change at 1 week and 2 weeks, suggesting the importance of evaluating not only initial PPS but also change in PPS.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 571-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Beijer ◽  
Eric A. R. Gielisse ◽  
Pierre S. Hupperets ◽  
Ben E. E. M. van den Borne ◽  
Marieke van den Beuken-van Everdingen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document