scholarly journals Uninsured Veterans Who Will Need to Obtain Insurance Coverage Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. e57-e62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Tsai ◽  
Robert Rosenheck
JAMA Surgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 151 (12) ◽  
pp. e163609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl K. Zogg ◽  
Fernando Payró Chew ◽  
John W. Scott ◽  
Lindsey L. Wolf ◽  
Thomas C. Tsai ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (11) ◽  
pp. 1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Cannon ◽  
Hailey M. Shepherd ◽  
Hilary McCrary ◽  
Patrick S. Carpenter ◽  
Luke O. Buchmann ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 559-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey L. Corrigan ◽  
Leticia Nogueira ◽  
K. Robin Yabroff ◽  
Chun Chieh Lin ◽  
Xuesong Han ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol I (1) ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
Bogna N. Brzezinska

Background The Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, which provided a platform for states to develop insurance marketplaces. The goal of this legislation was to improve insurance coverage by providing more affordable options to patients. One metric of the Affordable Care Act was to improve access to comprehensive cancer care. Objective To identify to the effect of the Affordable Care Act on access to Gynecologic Oncologists in Ohio. Study design The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act increased access to health insurance in Ohio, through Medicaid expansion and creation of a healthcare marketplace. We accessed information on access and usage of the healthcare marketplace in Ohio through Healthinsurance.org. We identified Gynecologic Oncology practices in Ohio through the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and confirmed these practices by telephone. We communicated with each practice and identified which practices took marketplace health insurance. We also gathered information on changes in usage from 2014-2018. We then used descriptive statistics to identify access to a Gynecologic Oncologist though these exchanges. Results In 2017, there were 238,843 people enrolled in marketplace insurance (2% of the Ohio population). We identified 11 practices in Ohio with 39 Gynecologic Oncologists, and 11 marketplace insurance providers. Of these insurers, 7 could be clearly identified as providing access to 5 different Gynecologic Oncology practices. Of the 11 practices, 5 were confirmed to accept marketplace insurance (46%). Interestingly, 3 practices were unsure whether they took patients on marketplace insurance (27%), and 3 definitively did not take patients on marketplace insurance (27%). Each practice varied with how many exchanges they accepted, with 4 out of 5 accepting insurance through more than one insurer. Conclusions About half of the Gynecologic Oncology practices in Ohio accepted insurance through the insurance marketplace, which may limit patient access to a Gynecologic Oncologist.


2012 ◽  
Vol 5;15 (5;9) ◽  
pp. E629-E640
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), informally referred to as ObamaCare, is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. ACA has substantially changed the landscape of medical practice in the United States and continues to influence all sectors, in particular evolving specialties such as interventional pain management. ObamaCare has been signed into law amidst major political fallouts, has sustained a Supreme Court challenge and emerged bruised, but still very much alive. While proponents argue that ObamaCare will provide insurance for almost everyone, with an improvement in the quality of and reduction in the cost of health care, opponents criticize it as being a massive bureaucracy laden with penalties and taxes, that will ultimately eliminate personal medicine and individual practices. Based on the 2 years since the passage of ACA in 2010, the prognosis for interventional pain management is unclear. The damage sustained to interventional pain management and the majority of medicine practices is irreparable. ObamaCare may provide insurance for all, but with cuts in Medicare to fund ObamaCare, a limited expansion of Medicaid, the inadequate funding of exchanges, declining employer health insurance coverage and skyrocketing disability claims, the coverage will be practically nonexistent. ObamaCare is composed of numerous organizations and bureaucracies charged with controlling the practice of medicine through the extension of regulations. Apart from cutting reimbursements and reducing access to interventional pain management, administration officials are determined to increase the role of midlevel practitioners and reduce the role of individual physicians by liberalizing the scope of practice regulations and introducing proposals to reduce medical education and training. Key words: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, ObamaCare, interventional pain management, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Independent Payment Advisory Board, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Accountable Care Organizations, Medicare, Medicaid


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lance Gable

The passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in March 2010 represents a significant turning point in the evolution of health care law and policy in the United States. By establishing a legal infrastructure that seeks to achieve universal health insurance coverage in the United States, the ACA targets some of the major impediments to accessing needed health care for millions of Americans and by extension attempts to strengthen the health system to support key determinants of health. Yet, like many newly passed legislative provisions, the ultimate effects and significance of the ACA remain uncertain. Those charged with implementing the ACA face formidable obstacles — indeed, some of the same obstacles that have been erected to impede other major pieces of social legislation in the past — including entrenched political opposition, constitutional challenges, and what will likely be a prolonged struggle over the content and direction of how the law is implemented. As these debates continue, it is nevertheless important to begin to assess the impact that the ACA has already had on health law in the United States and to consider the likely effects that the law will have on public health going forward.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. A252
Author(s):  
C.E. Begley ◽  
A. Deshmukh ◽  
K. Eschbach ◽  
N. Fouladi ◽  
J. Liu ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-70
Author(s):  
Theresa Jefferson ◽  
Gloria Phillips-Wren ◽  
Phoebe D. Sharkey

The adoption of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in 2010 with the intent to improve the U.S. health care delivery system by expanding health insurance coverage and controlling health care costs has generated intense debate regarding its implementation. Marketplaces known as insurance exchanges have been established to provide coverage for Americans who otherwise could not get affordable health care benefits. These exchanges have been plagued with financial losses and other challenges leading to several large insurance providers discontinuing participation in the program. There are many possible remedies under consideration to make the program work better. This research seeks to support program evaluation as well as potential modifications to the law by providing baseline data to compare access and costs in states with state-based exchanges compared to states with federal exchanges. The authors perform an analysis by state for the years 2012 and 2013 (pre-PPACA implementation) using data from the Current Population Survey (U.S. Census) as well as de-identified claims data from Inovalon, Inc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document