Damage of an Alumina-on-Alumina Bearing Surface from a Difficult Reduction of a Total Hip Arthroplasty

2004 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 376-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Joon Yoo ◽  
Hee Joong Kim ◽  
Young-Min Kim
2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (2) ◽  
pp. 134-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Hexter ◽  
S. M. Hislop ◽  
G. W. Blunn ◽  
A. D. Liddle

Aims Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different bearing surface materials have different surface properties and it has been suggested that the choice of bearing surface may influence the risk of PJI after THA. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the rate of PJI between metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings. Patients and Methods Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for comparative randomized and observational studies that reported the incidence of PJI for different bearing surfaces. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility, evaluated risk of bias, and performed data extraction. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel–Haenzel method and random-effects model in accordance with methods of the Cochrane group. Results Our search strategy revealed 2272 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. These comprised 11 randomized controlled trials and six observational studies. The overall quality of included studies was high but the observational studies were at high risk of bias due to inadequate adjustment for confounding factors. The overall cumulative incidence of PJI across all studies was 0.78% (1514/193 378). For each bearing combination, the overall incidence was as follows: MoP 0.85% (1353/158 430); CoP 0.38% (67/17 489); and CoC 0.53% (94/17 459). The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the three bearing combinations in terms of risk of PJI. Conclusion On the basis of the clinical studies available, there is no evidence that bearing choice influences the risk of PJI. Future research, including basic science studies and large, adequately controlled registry studies, may be helpful in determining whether implant materials play a role in determining the risk of PJI following arthroplasty surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:134–42.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pil Whan Yoon ◽  
Jeong Joon Yoo ◽  
Yunjung Kim ◽  
Seungmi Yoo ◽  
Sahnghoon Lee ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami Madanat ◽  
Inari Laaksonen ◽  
Stephen E Graves ◽  
Michelle Lorimer ◽  
Orhun Muratoglu ◽  
...  

Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and bearing material’s associations to PJI prevalence is largely unknown. The main purposes of this study were to determine if revision for infection varied depending on the type of bearing surface used in primary THA and to study whether patient or implant related factors had an effect on this variation. Methods: A total of 177,237 primary THA procedures from the Australian Registry (AOANJRR) were analysed. 3 bearing surfaces were compared. Metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (MoXP) bearing had been used in 95,129 hips, ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (CoXP) in 24,269 hips, and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) in 57,839 hips. Revision rates for infection were compared between the 3 groups. Results: Both MoXP and CoXP had a higher revision rate for infection compared to CoC hips (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46 (1.25, 1.72), p < 0.001) and HR 1.42 (1.15, 1.75), p = 0.001 respectively). Patients aged 70 years or less had a lower revision rate for infection when a CoC bearing was used. This difference was independent of sex, and prostheses selection. No difference was evident if the femoral component was cemented or a head size of 28 mm was used. Discussion: In this registry-based material, use of a CoC bearing was associated with a lower risk of revision for infection in patients younger than 70 years when cementless femoral components were used. Further studies are needed to verify this finding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1757-1763.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathanael D. Heckmann ◽  
Lakshmanan Sivasundaram ◽  
Michael D. Stefl ◽  
Hyunwoo Paco Kang ◽  
Eric T. Basler ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1024-1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ito ◽  
Akio Minami ◽  
Takeo Matsuno ◽  
Hiromasa Tanino ◽  
Toshio Yuhta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Bum Jeong ◽  
Hyeok Kim ◽  
JUN-IL YOO

Abstract Background: In this research, a triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) was utilized to determine if a pressure-based sensor could detect bearing friction in a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and detect the contact of specific areas during ROM checks. Methods: In order to realize the flexible switch sensor, one of the elastomers, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), was introduced from the solution. Then, copper tape, which is made of metal, was attached to the produced PDMS film to make an electrode and connection was made with a wire. Afterwards, the fabricated TENG sensors are measured with output voltages through an oscilloscope. Results: The pressure-based sensor shows capability to sense bearing friction. In more detail, the TENG embedded in four different sides of the trial exhibits up to 1 V from peak-to-peak. Moreover, these flexible touch sensors with TENG describes a peak signal in output voltage which should lead to extremely sensitive detection of bearing friction induced by the THA. Conclusions: The conclusion of this study is that the TENG pressure-based sensor was able to detect friction in the THA bearing and detect the contact area of ​​the bearing surface in the range of motion (ROM). Further research will be carried out to develop biocompatible sensors and to enable precise pressure-sensing.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-85
Author(s):  
Alessandro Aprato ◽  
Giorgio Governale ◽  
Alessandro Stucchi ◽  
Martino Deregibus ◽  
Alessandro Masse

Orthopedics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. e1581-e1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng-Chih Kuo ◽  
Hao-Chen Liu ◽  
Wun-Schen Chen ◽  
Jun-Wen Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document