A powerful approach for decision making in Risk Management process: BART tool and AHP methodology for ALARP demonstration

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annamaria Petrone ◽  
Paolo Cherubin ◽  
Luciano Scataglini
2021 ◽  
Vol 343 ◽  
pp. 07013
Author(s):  
Iulia Dumitraşcu-Băldău ◽  
Alexandru Căpăţînă ◽  
Dănuţ Dumitru Dumitraşcu

International projects with teams in the virtual environment (IPTVE) are known as complex and high risk projects, these features being considered as significant obstacles to project success. Applying the appropriate risk management methodology could increase their success rate, becoming a fundamental tool for decision making. Research on IPTVE management risks is scarce, focused on specific sectors as software development or construction, without taking into account the differences between traditional and international projects. Thereby, risk management within IPTVE becomes a necessary approach for the performance in managing international projects. This article aims to improve the risk management process within IPTVE, by proposing a flexible theoretical model of the process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.12) ◽  
pp. 322
Author(s):  
Subramanyam B ◽  
Iswarya R

This paper will focus on troubled projects in construction due to inadequate and insufficient risk management. Inadequate risk management has the ability to severely impact construction project. The main objective of the present paper is to attempt a composition of already known risk management process, at such way that it can be applied by the modern enterprises that deal with the undertaking or/and implementation of constructional work. This paper describes about the main sources for the failure of a construction project such as no initial risk assessment, inadequate documentation and tracking, irregular & incomplete status reporting, failure to define parameters etc. The methodology contains examining existing data, results and created a checklist for all those who are involved in construction project disasters. It can be applied at all stages in the project cycle, from the earliest assessments of strategy to initiation, planning, implementation and closure. Risk management will also provide advantages in better accountability and justification of decisions, by providing a well-suited and robust process that supports decision-making. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Soumaya Amraoui ◽  
Mina Elmaallam ◽  
Hicham Bensaid ◽  
Abdelaziz Kriouile

The security of a company's information system (IS) is an important requirement for the pursuit of its business. Risk management contributes to the protection of the IS assets. It saves the organism from the losses caused by the emergence of unwanted events having an incidence on the IS objectives and consequently on its strategy. It has also an important role in the decision making about entering new opportunities. In addition, it promises an optimal allocation of information system resources. The risk management process aims to analyze what can happen and what are the eventual consequences for the organization before deciding what needs to be done and reducing the risks to an acceptable level. This paper presents a literature review of IS risk management and gives a comparative analyse of its processes, methods and standards.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Firmenich

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to emphasise on the need for efficient and effective project risk management practices and to support project managers in increasing the cost certainty of projects by proposing a new framework for project risk management. Design/methodology/approach The author adopts a “constructivist” methodology, drawing on practices common in construction management sciences and new institutional economics. Findings The author presents a holistic and customisable project risk management framework that is grounded in both practice and academia. The framework is holistic because, amongst others, all steps of the typical risk management process are addressed. The framework is customisable, because it allows for alternative ways of implementing the project risk management steps depending on the project-specific circumstances. Research limitations/implications The framework does not address the potential unwillingness of the project players to set up a project risk management process, at all. The proposed framework has not yet been tested empirically. Future research will seek to validate the framework. Originality/value The framework is designed to account for the difficult circumstances of a complex construction project. It is intended to support decision makers in customising a practical yet comprehensive project risk management concept to the characteristics of the unique project. Although many other project risk management concepts are designed based on the assumption that actors are perfectly rational and informed, this framework’s design is based on the opposite assumption. The framework is dynamic and should adapt over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document