Computational Fluid Dynamics CFD Evaluation of Laminar Flow of Bitumen-in-Water Emulsion Stabilized by Poly Vinyl Alcohol PVA: Effects of Salinity and Water Cut

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olalekan Alade ◽  
Dhafer Al Shehri ◽  
Mohamed Mahmoud ◽  
Kyuro Sasaki ◽  
Yuichi Sugai
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anwer Faraj ◽  
Itimad D J Azzawi ◽  
Samir Ghazi Yahya ◽  
Amer Al-damook

Abstract Experimental investigations of the flows inside helically coiled pipe are difficult and may also be expensive, particularly for small diameters. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) packages, which can easily construct the geometry and change the dimensions with 100% of accuracy, provide an alternative solution for the experimental difficulties and uncertainties. Therefore, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was conducted to analyse the flow structure and the effect of varying the coil pitch on the coil friction factor, through utilising different models' configurations. Two coils were tested, all of them sharing the same pipe and coil diameter: 0.005m and 0.04m respectively. Pitch variations began with 0.01 and 0.05 m for the first, second model respectively. In this study, the velocity was analysed, and the effects of this reduction on coil friction factor were also examined using laminar flow. The results were validated by Ito's equation for the laminar flow.


2012 ◽  
Vol 225 ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
Yogeswaran Sinnasamy ◽  
Noor Arbiah Yahaya ◽  
Shahnor Basri ◽  
Abdul Aziz Jaafar ◽  
Azmin Shakrine Mohd Rafie

In this paper, the effects of changing under-relaxation factors for different variables on the numerical solution of 2D incompressible laminar flow over a backward-facing step (BFS) are studied using PHOENICS commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software. This is conducted by changing under-relaxation factors for velocities and pressure during the 2D simulation. Ten different batches of under-relaxation factor for pressure ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 were used while the values of under-relaxation factor for velocities were manipulated between 0.1 and 1.0. For each batch of the computation, the error percentage of pressure and velocities were obtained. Based on this work, it is found that the recommended values of under-relaxation factor for pressure to achieve lower error percentage are between 0.6 and 0.8. Based on findings of the study, the appropriate values of under-relaxation factor for pressure and velocities can be selected to achieve the levels of error percentage permitted for computational studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document