History Matching Standards; Quality Control and Risk Analysis for Simulation

Author(s):  
R.O. Baker ◽  
S. Chugh ◽  
C. Mcburney ◽  
R. McKishnie
2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cleyton Lage Andrade ◽  
Miguel Angel De La O Herrera ◽  
Elezer Monte Blanco Lemes

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Luiza de Oliveira Salomé Abreu ◽  
Manuelle Santos Góis ◽  
José Nilson Pereira Silva

Author(s):  
J. Christopher Bouwmeester ◽  
Vicki Komisar ◽  
Arushri Swarup

Abstract – A simulation is used to facilitate cooperative and team-based learning to introduce concepts of human factors, risk analysis, and quality control applied to the design of medical devices. We further use a friendly game-based approach to simulate the dynamics between a customer, a regulatory agency, and competitive manufacturers. Students are divided into manufacturing teams/companies and teaching assistants act as the customer and regulator. To promote positive interdependence and individual accountability, each student within a company is assigned roles of CEO, inspector, marketer, and designer. The goal for each company is to design and produce as many eye patch medical devices as possible, which must be approved by the regulator, within a tight deadline. Products are evaluated by the customer, who decides what price to pay for each unit, at the end of production. The most successful company is determined by the greatest amount of money earned after two rounds of production and sales.


Author(s):  
Denis José Schiozer ◽  
Antonio Alberto de Souza dos Santos ◽  
Susana Margarida de Graça Santos ◽  
João Carlos von Hohendorff Filho

This work describes a new methodology for integrated decision analysis in the development and management of petroleum fields considering reservoir simulation, risk analysis, history matching, uncertainty reduction, representative models, and production strategy selection under uncertainty. Based on the concept of closed-loop reservoir management, we establish 12 steps to assist engineers in model updating and production optimization under uncertainty. The methodology is applied to UNISIM-I-D, a benchmark case based on the Namorado field in the Campos Basin, Brazil. The results show that the method is suitable for use in practical applications of complex reservoirs in different field stages (development and management). First, uncertainty is characterized in detail and then scenarios are generated using an efficient sampling technique, which reduces the number of evaluations and is suitable for use with numerical reservoir simulation. We then perform multi-objective history-matching procedures, integrating static data (geostatistical realizations generated using reservoir information) and dynamic data (well production and pressure) to reduce uncertainty and thus provide a set of matched models for production forecasts. We select a small set of Representative Models (RMs) for decision risk analysis, integrating reservoir, economic and other uncertainties to base decisions on risk-return techniques. We optimize the production strategies for (1) each individual RM to obtain different specialized solutions for field development and (2) all RMs simultaneously in a probabilistic procedure to obtain a robust strategy. While the second approach ensures the best performance under uncertainty, the first provides valuable insights for the expected value of information and flexibility analyses. Finally, we integrate reservoir and production systems to ensure realistic production forecasts. This methodology uses reservoir simulations, not proxy models, to reliably predict field performance. The proposed methodology is efficient, easy-to-use and compatible with real-time operations, even in complex cases where the computational time is restrictive.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adherbal C. Netto ◽  
Arthur H. de A. Melani ◽  
Miguel A. de C. Michalski ◽  
Carlos A. Murad ◽  
Marjorie M. Belinello ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 346 ◽  
pp. 03018
Author(s):  
Vladimir Gaponov ◽  
Dmitriy Kuznetsov ◽  
Andrey Khvostikov ◽  
Roman Alekhin

The paper considers a new version of IRIS ISO/TS 22163:2017 standard in relation to the quality of repair of complex equipment in the railway industry. It is shown that the new version of ISO/ TS 22163:2017 standard provides for the need of organizations to conduct risk analysis and accounting in their work. The authors propose to consider as an example a well-established analysis of the types and consequences of potential defects in FMEA process. The use of FMEA analysis made it possible to consider the significance of various risks of the quality of traction rolling stock repair, as well as to establish the importance of quality control operations for impregnation of a traction motor.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Gomes ◽  
F. S. Oliveira ◽  
W. N. Preda ◽  
R. P. Neves

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document