Analysis of Horizontal-Well Responses: Contemporary vs. Conventional

2001 ◽  
Vol 4 (04) ◽  
pp. 260-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdal Ozkan
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Well ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Well Test ◽  
Transient Pressure ◽  
Vertical Wells ◽  
Well Test Analysis ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Response Models ◽  
In The Beginning ◽  
Well Models

Summary Most of the conventional horizontal-well transient-response models were developed during the 1980's. These models visualized horizontal wells as vertical wells rotated 90°. In the beginning of the 1990's, it was realized that horizontal wells deserve genuine models and concepts. Wellbore conductivity, nonuniform skin effect, selective completion, and multiple laterals are a few of the new concepts. Although well-established analysis procedures are yet to be developed, some contemporary horizontal-well models are now available. The contemporary models, however, are generally sophisticated. The basic objective of this paper is to answer two important questions:When should we use the contemporary models? andHow much error do we make by using the conventional models? This objective is accomplished by considering examples and comparing the results of the contemporary and conventional approaches. Introduction Since the early 1980's, horizontal wells have been extremely popular in the oil industry and have gained an impeccable standing among the conventional well completions. The rapid increase in the applications of horizontal-well technology brought an impetuous development of the procedures to evaluate the performances of horizontal wells. These procedures, however, used the vertical-well concepts almost indiscriminately to analyze the horizontal-well transient-pressure responses.1–14 Among these concepts were 1) the assumptions of a line-source well and an infinite-conductivity wellbore, 2) a single lateral withdrawing fluids along its entire length, and 3) a skin region that is uniformly distributed along the well. It should be realized that for the lengths, production rates, and configurations of horizontal wells drilled in the 1980's, these concepts were usually justifiable. The increased lengths of horizontal wells, high production rates, sectional and multilateral completions, and the vast variety of other new applications toward the end of the 1980's made us question the validity of the horizontal-well models and the well-test concepts adopted from vertical wells. The interest in improved horizontal-well models also flourished on the grounds of high productivities of horizontal wells. It was realized that, in many cases, a few percent of the production rate of a reasonably long horizontal well could amount to the cumulative production rate of a few vertical wells. In addition, the productivity-reducing effects were additive; that is, a slight reduction in the productivity here and there could add up to a sizeable loss of the well's production capacity. Furthermore, the low oil prices also created an economic environment where the marginal gains and losses in the productivity may decisively affect the economics of many projects. In the beginning of the 1990's, a new wave of developing horizontal-well solutions under more realistic conditions gained impetus.15–25 As a result, some contemporary models are available today for those who want to challenge the limitations of the conventional horizontal-well models. Unfortunately, the rigor is accomplished at the expense of complexity. Furthermore, even when a rigorous model is available, well-established analysis procedures are usually yet to be developed. This paper presents a critique of the conventional and contemporary horizontal well-test-analysis procedures. The main objective of this assessment is to answer the two fundamental questions horizontal-well-test analysts are currently facing:When is the use of contemporary analysis methods essential? andIf the conventional analysis methods are used, what are the margins of error? Background: The Conventional Methods The standard models of horizontal-well-test analysis have been developed mostly during the 1980's.1-4,8,9 Despite the differences in the development of these models, the basic assumptions and the final solutions are similar. Fig. 1 is a sketch of the horizontal well-reservoir system considered in the pressure-transient-response models. A horizontal well of length Lh is assumed to be located in an infinite slab reservoir of thickness h. The elevation of the horizontal well from the bottom boundary of the formation (well eccentricity) is denoted by zw. The top and bottom reservoir boundaries are usually assumed to be impermeable, although some models consider constant-pressure boundaries.14,15 Before discussing the characteristic features of the conventional horizontal-well transient-pressure-response models, we must first define the dimensionless variables to be used in our discussion. We define the dimensionless pressure, time, and distance in the conventional manner except that we use the horizontal-well half-length, Lh/2, as the reference length in the system. These variables are defined, respectively, by the following expressions.Equation 1Equation 2Equation 3Equation 4 In Eqs. 1 through 3, k=the harmonic average of the principal permeabilities that are assumed to be in the directions of the coordinate axes (). We also define the dimensionless horizontal-well length, wellbore radius, and well eccentricity (distance from the bottom boundary of the formation) as follows.Equation 5Equation 6Equation 7 In Eq. 6, rw, eq=the equivalent radius of the horizontal well in an anisotropic reservoir.26

Flow Modeling of Well Test Analysis for a Multiple-fractured Horizontal Well in Triple Media Carbonate Reservoir

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Wang ◽  
Xiangyi Yi
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Well ◽  
Outer Boundary ◽  
Superposition Principle ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
Well Test ◽  
Transient Pressure ◽  
Well Test Analysis ◽  
Fractured Horizontal Well ◽  
Fractured Horizontal Wells

AbstractCarbonate reservoir is one kinds of important reservoir in the world. Because of the characteristics of carbonate reservoir, horizontal well, and acid fracturing became a key technology for efficiently developing carbonate reservoir. Establishing corresponding mathematical models and analyzing transient pressure behaviors of this type of well-reservoir configuration can provide a better understanding of fluid flow patterns in formation as well as estimations of important parameters. A coupling mathematical model for a fractured horizontal well in triple media carbonate reservoir with three kinds of reservoir outer boundaries by conceptualizing vugs as spherical shapes is presented in this article, in which the infinite conductivity of the acid fractures is taken into account. A semi-analytical solution is obtained in the Laplace domain by using source function theory, Laplace transformation, discretization of fracture, and superposition principle. Analysis of transient pressure responses indicates that several characteristic flow periods of fractured horizontal wells in triple media carbonate reservoir can be identified. Parametric analysis shows that fracture half-length, fracture number, fracture spacing, conditions of reservoir outer boundary, and so on can significantly influence the transient pressure responses of fractured horizontal wells in triple media carbonate reservoir. The model presented in this article can be applied to obtain important parameters pertinent to reservoir or fracture by type curve matching, and it can also provide useful information for optimizing fracture parameters.

Evaluating the Performance of Horizontal Multi-Frac Wells in a Depleted Gas Condensate Reservoir in Sultanate of Oman

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef R. Shaoul ◽  
Jason Park ◽  
Andrew Boucher ◽  
Inna Tkachuk ◽  
Cornelis Veeken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Well ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Gas Condensate ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Single Fracture ◽  
Reservoir Pressure ◽  
Well Test ◽  
Vertical Wells ◽  
Fracture Conductivity ◽  
Half Length

Abstract The Saih Rawl gas condensate field has been producing for 20 years from multiple fractured vertical wells covering a very thick gross interval with varying reservoir permeability. After many years of production, the remaining reserves are mainly in the lowest permeability upper units. A pilot program using horizontal multi-frac wells was started in 2015, and five wells were drilled, stimulated and tested over a four-year period. The number of stages per horizontal well ranged from 6 to 14, but in all cases production was much less than expected based on the number of stages and the production from offset vertical wells producing from the same reservoir units with a single fracture. The scope of this paper is to describe the work that was performed to understand the reason for the lower than expected performance of the horizontal wells, how to improve the performance, and the implementation of those ideas in two additional horizontal wells completed in 2020. The study workflow was to perform an integrated analysis of fracturing, production and well test data, in order to history match all available data with a consistent reservoir description (permeability and fracture properties). Fracturing data included diagnostic injections (breakdown, step-rate test and minifrac) and main fracture treatments, where net pressure matching was performed. After closure analysis (ACA) was not possible in most cases due to low reservoir pressure and absence of downhole gauges. Post-fracture well test and production matching was performed using 3D reservoir simulation models including local grid refinement to capture fracture dimensions and conductivity. Based on simulation results, the effective propped fracture half-length seen in the post-frac production was extremely small, on the order of tens of meters, in some of the wells. In other wells, the effective fracture half-length was consistent with the created propped half-length, but the fracture conductivity was extremely small (finite conductivity fracture). The problems with the propped fractures appear to be related to a combination of poor proppant pack cleanup, low proppant concentration and small proppant diameter, compounded by low reservoir pressure which has a negative impact on proppant regained permeability after fracturing with crosslinked gel. Key conclusions from this study are that 1) using the same fracture design in a horizontal well with transverse fractures will not give the same result as in a vertical well in the same reservoir, 2) the effect of depletion on proppant pack cleanup in high temperature tight gas reservoirs appears to be very strong, requiring an adjustment in fracture design and proppant selection to achieve reasonable fracture conductivity, and 3) achieving sufficient effective propped length and height is key to economic production.

Condensate Bank Characterization from Well Test Data and Fluid PVT Properties

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (05) ◽  
pp. 596-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manijeh Bozorgzadeh ◽  
Alain C. Gringarten
Keyword(s):  
Capillary Number ◽  
Gas Condensate ◽  
Test Interpretation ◽  
Well Test ◽  
Transient Pressure ◽  
Compositional Simulation ◽  
Well Test Analysis ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Inertia Effects ◽  
The North

Summary Published well-test analyses in gas/condensate reservoirs in which the pressure has dropped below the dewpoint are usually based on a two- or three-region radial composite well-test interpretation model to represent condensate dropout around the wellbore and initial gas in place away from the well. Gas/condensate-specific results from well-test analysis are the mobility and storativity ratios between the regions and the condensate-bank radius. For a given region, however, well-test analysis cannot uncouple the storativity ratio from the region radius, and the storativity ratio must be estimated independently to obtain the correct bank radius. In most cases, the storativity ratio is calculated incorrectly, which explains why condensate bank radii from well-test analysis often differ greatly from those obtained by numerical compositional simulation. In this study, a new method is introduced to estimate the storativity ratios between the different zones from buildup data when the saturation profile does not change during the buildup. Application of the method is illustrated with the analysis of a transient-pressure test in a gas/condensate field in the North Sea. The analysis uses single-phase pseudo pressures and two- and three-zone radial composite well-test interpretation models to yield the condensate-bank radius. The calculated condensate-bank radius is validated by verifying analytical well-test analyses with compositional simulations that include capillary number and inertia effects. Introduction and Background When the bottomhole flowing pressure falls below the dewpoint in a gas/condensate reservoir, retrograde condensation occurs, and a bank of condensate builds up around the producing well. This process creates concentric zones with different liquid saturations around the well (Fevang and Whitson 1996; Kniazeff and Nvaille 1965; Economides et al. 1987). The zone away from the well, where the reservoir pressure is still above the dewpoint, contains the original gas. The condensate bank around the wellbore contains two phases, reservoir gas and liquid condensate, and has a reduced gas mobility, except in the immediate vicinity of the well at high production rates, where the relative permeability to gas is greater than in the bank because of capillary number effects (Danesh et al. 1994; Boom et al. 1995; Henderson et al. 1998; Mott et al. 1999).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document