Performance Evaluation of Two Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms--MBIR and ASIR, in Low Radiation Dose and Low Contrast Dose Abdominal CT in Children

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihang Sun ◽  
Lixin Yang ◽  
Zuofu Zhou ◽  
Dan Zhang ◽  
Wei Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Abdominal Ct ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Low Radiation Dose ◽  
Contrast Dose ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ct ◽  
Noise Ratio

Abstract Background The adverse effect of low-dose CT on image quality may be mitigated using iterative reconstructions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and adaptive statistical reconstruction (ASIR) algorithms in low radiation dose and low contrast dose abdominal contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in children. Methods A total of 59 children (32 males and 27 females) undergoing low radiation dose (100kVp) and low contrast dose (270 mgI/ml) abdominal CECT were enrolled. The median age was 4.0 years (ranging from 0.3 to 13 years). The raw data were reconstructed with MBIR, ASIR and filtered back projection (FBP) algorithms into 6 groups (MBIR, 100%ASIR, 80%ASIR, 60%ASIR, 40%ASIR and FBP). The CT numbers, standard deviations, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of liver, pancreas, kidney and abdominal aorta were measured. Two radiologists independently evaluated the subjective image quality including the overall image noise and structure display ability on a 4-point scale with 3 being clinically acceptable. The measurements among the reconstruction groups were compared using one-way ANOVA. Results The overall image noise score and display ability were 4.00±0.00 and 4.00±0.00 with MBIR, and 3.27±0.33 and 3.25±0.43 with ASIR100%, respectively, which met the diagnostic requirement; other reconstructions couldn’t meet the diagnostic requirements. Compared with FBP images, the noise of MBIR images was reduced by 62.86%-65.73% for the respective organs (F=48.15-80.47, P<0.05), and CNR increased by 151.38%-170.69% (F=22.94-38.02, P<0.05). Conclusions MBIR or ASIR100% improves the image quality of low radiation dose and contrast dose abdominal CT in children to meet the diagnostic requirements, and MBIR has the best performance.

scholarly journals Studies on the radiation dose, image quality and low contrast detectability from MSCT abdomen by using low tube voltage

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mokhtar ◽  
Z. A. Aabdelbary ◽  
A. Sarhan ◽  
H. M. Gad ◽  
M. T. Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Tube Voltage ◽  
Current Time ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Low Tube Voltage ◽  
Tube Current ◽  
Noise Ratio

Abstract Background To study radiation dose, image quality and low-contrast cylinder detectability from multislice CT (MSCT) abdomen by using low tube voltage using the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. The ACR phantom (low-contrast module) was scanned with 64 MSCT scanner (Brilliance, Philips Medical System, Eindhoven, Netherlands) with 80 and 120 KVP, utilizing different tube current time product (mAs) range from 50 to 380 mAs. The image noise (SD), signal to noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and scores of low contrast detectability were assessed for every image respectively. Results From images analyses, the noise essentially increased with the use of low tube voltage. The CNR was 0.94 ± 0.27 at 120 KVP, and CNR was 0.43 ± 0.22 at 80 KVP. However, with the same dose, there were no differences of statistical significance in scores of low-contrast detectability between 120 KVP at 300mAs and 80 KVP at (200–380) mAs (p > 0.05). At 300 mAs, the CTDIvol obtained at 80 KVP was about 29% of that at 120 KVP. The CTDIvol obtained at 80 KVP were decreased from 5% at 50 mAs, to 37% at 380 mAs. Conclusions There is a possibility to decrease exposure of radiation virtually by reducing KVP from 120 to 80 KVP in examination of abdominal CT when the high tube current is used, though increasing image noise at low tube voltage.

scholarly journals Deep Learning Versus Iterative Reconstruction for CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Setting: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 558
Author(s):  
Marc Lenfant ◽  
Olivier Chevallier ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Comby ◽  
Grégory Secco ◽  
Karim Haioun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Noise Signal ◽  
Pulmonary Angiography ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Dose Length Product ◽  
Noise Ratio

To compare image quality and the radiation dose of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) subjected to the first deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLR) (50%) algorithm, with images subjected to the hybrid-iterative reconstruction (IR) technique (50%). One hundred forty patients who underwent CTPA for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) between 2018 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Image quality was assessed quantitatively (image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) and qualitatively (on a 5-point scale). Radiation dose parameters (CT dose index, CTDIvol; and dose-length product, DLP) were also recorded. Ninety-three patients were finally analyzed, 48 with hybrid-IR and 45 with DLR images. The image noise was significantly lower and the SNR (24.4 ± 5.9 vs. 20.7 ± 6.1) and CNR (21.8 ± 5.8 vs. 18.6 ± 6.0) were significantly higher on DLR than hybrid-IR images (p < 0.01). DLR images received a significantly higher score than hybrid-IR images for image quality, with both soft (4.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8) and lung (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9) filters (p < 0.01). No difference in diagnostic confidence level for PE between both techniques was found. CTDIvol (4.8 ± 1.4 vs. 4.0 ± 1.2 mGy) and DLP (157.9 ± 44.9 vs. 130.8 ± 41.2 mGy∙cm) were lower on DLR than hybrid-IR images. DLR both significantly improved the image quality and reduced the radiation dose of CTPA examinations as compared to the hybrid-IR technique.

Improvement of Image Quality at Low–Radiation Dose and Low–Contrast Material Dose Abdominal CT in Patients With Cirrhosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Namimoto ◽  
Seitaro Oda ◽  
Daisuke Utsunomiya ◽  
Toshiaki Shimonobo ◽  
Sosuke Morita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Contrast Material ◽  
Abdominal Ct ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Low Radiation Dose

Ultra-low-dose lung screening CT with model-based iterative reconstruction: an assessment of image quality and lesion conspicuity

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Hye Ju ◽  
Geewon Lee ◽  
Ji Won Lee ◽  
Seung Baek Hong ◽  
Young Ju Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Low Dose Ct ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Lung Screening ◽  
Lesion Conspicuity ◽  
Group 1

Background Reducing radiation dose inevitably increases image noise, and thus, it is important in low-dose computed tomography (CT) to maintain image quality and lesion detection performance. Purpose To assess image quality and lesion conspicuity of ultra-low-dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and to determine a suitable protocol for lung screening CT. Material and Methods A total of 120 heavy smokers underwent lung screening CT and were randomly and equally assigned to one of five groups: group 1 = 120 kVp, 25 mAs, with FBP reconstruction; group 2 = 120 kVp, 10 mAs, with MBIR; group 3 = 100 kVp, 15 mAs, with MBIR; group 4 = 100 kVp, 10 mAs, with MBIR; and group 5 = 100 kVp, 5 mAs, with MBIR. Two radiologists evaluated intergroup differences with respect to radiation dose, image noise, image quality, and lesion conspicuity using the Kruskal–Wallis test and the Chi-square test. Results Effective doses were 61–87% lower in groups 2–5 than in group 1. Image noises in groups 1 and 5 were significantly higher than in the other groups ( P < 0.001). Overall image quality was best in group 1, but diagnostic acceptability of overall image qualities in groups 1–3 was not significantly different (all P values > 0.05). Lesion conspicuities were similar in groups 1–4, but were significantly poorer in group 5. Conclusion Lung screening CT with MBIR obtained at 100 kVp and 15 mAs enables a ∼60% reduction in radiation dose versus low-dose CT, while maintaining image quality and lesion conspicuity.

An open label, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study of iodixanol 270 mg I/mL for use in individuals undergoing computed tomography angiography in real-world clinical practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-185
Author(s):  
Xiangying Du ◽  
Bin Lu ◽  
Daoyu Hu ◽  
Bin Song ◽  
Kuncheng Li
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Iterative Reconstruction ◽  
Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Pulmonary Arteries ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tube Voltage ◽  
Effective Radiation Dose ◽  
Noise Ratio

Background Concern about radiation exposure is leading to an increasing interest in low-concentration contrast medium administration. Purpose To evaluate the image quality and safety profile after administration of iodixanol 270 mg I/mL at 100-kVp tube voltage with iterative reconstruction in subjects undergoing computed tomography angiography (CTA). Material and Methods Patients who completed CTA examination using iodixanol 270 mg I/mL and 100-kVp tube voltage along with iterative reconstruction for coronary, aortic, head and neck, renal, or pulmonary arteries were included. Image quality was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) within seven days and radiation dose were also analyzed. Results A total of 4513 individuals in 42 centers in China were enrolled, among which 4367 were included in efficacy analysis. The mean image quality score was 4.8 ± 0.45 across all arteries (all above 4.6) and 99.7% of the individuals’ images were classified as evaluable. The CT attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the regions of interest (ROIs) were 431.79 ± 99.018, 18.29 ± 11.947, and 28.21 ± 19.535 HU, respectively. Of all the participants, 68 (1.5%) and 65 (1.4%) experienced AEs and ADRs, respectively. No serious AEs or AEs leading to discontinuation occurred. The average effective radiation dose was 3.13 ± 2.550 mSv. Conclusion Iodixanol 270 mg I/mL in combination with 100-kVp tube voltage and iterative reconstruction could be safely applied in CTA and yield high-quality and evaluable images with reduced radiation dose.

scholarly journals Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed E Othman ◽  
Malte Niklas Bongers ◽  
Dominik Zinsser ◽  
Christoph Schabel ◽  
Julian L Wichmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Confidence ◽  
Abdominal Ct ◽  
Reduced Dose

Background Patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal pain often undergo abdominal computed tomography (CT). However, abdominal CT is associated with high radiation exposure. Purpose To evaluate diagnostic performance of a reduced-dose 100 kVp CT protocol with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction as compared to a linearly blended 120 kVp protocol for assessment of acute, non-traumatic abdominal pain. Material and Methods Two radiologists assessed 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series of 112 consecutive patients with acute non-traumatic pain (onset < 48 h) regarding image quality, noise, and artifacts on a five-point Likert scale. Both radiologists assessed both series for abdominal pathologies and for diagnostic confidence. Both 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series were quantitatively evaluated regarding radiation dose and image noise. Comparative statistics and diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver operating curve (ROC) statistics, with final clinical diagnosis/clinical follow-up as reference standard. Results Image quality was high for both series without detectable significant differences ( P = 0.157). Image noise and artifacts were rated low for both series but significantly higher for 100 kVp ( P ≤ 0.021). Diagnostic accuracy was high for both series (120 kVp: area under the curve [AUC] = 0.950, sensitivity = 0.958, specificity = 0.941; 100 kVp: AUC ≥ 0.910, sensitivity ≥ 0.937, specificity = 0.882; P ≥ 0.516) with almost perfect inter-rater agreement (Kappa = 0.939). Diagnostic confidence was high for both dose levels without significant differences (100 kVp 5, range 4–5; 120 kVp 5, range 3–5; P = 0.134). The 100 kVp series yielded 26.1% lower radiation dose compared with the 120 kVp series (5.72 ± 2.23 mSv versus 7.75 ± 3.02 mSv, P < 0.001). Image noise was significantly higher in reduced-dose CT (13.3 ± 2.4 HU versus 10.6 ± 2.1 HU; P < 0.001). Conclusion Reduced-dose abdominal CT using 100 kVp yields excellent image quality and high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document