scholarly journals Prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction using a combined first- and second-trimester screening model in South Chinese infants: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiqing Zheng ◽  
Yan Feng ◽  
Jiexin Zhang ◽  
Kuanrong Li ◽  
Huiying Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Abdominal Circumference ◽  
Second Trimester

Abstract Background Prediction models for early and late fetal growth restriction (FGR) have been established in many high-income countries. However, prediction models for late FGR in China are limited. This study aimed to develop a simple combined first- and second-trimester prediction model for screening late-onset FGR in South Chinese infants.Methods This retrospective study included 2258 women who had singleton pregnancies and received routine ultrasound scans. Late-onset FGR was defined as a birth weight < the 10th percentile plus abnormal Doppler indices and/or a birth weight below the 3rd percentile after 32 weeks, regardless of the Doppler status. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a prediction model.Results Ninety-three fetuses were identified as late-onset FGR. The significant predictors for late-onset FGR were maternal age, height, weight, and medical history; the second-trimester head circumference (HC)/abdominal circumference (AC) ratio; and the estimated fetal weight (EFW). This model achieved a detection rate (DR) of 52.6% for late-onset FGR at a 10% false positive rate (FPR) (area under the curve (AUC): 0.80, 95%CI 0.76-0.85).Conclusions A multivariate model combining first- and second-trimester default tests can detect 52.6% of cases of late-onset FGR. Further studies with more screening markers are needed to improve the detection rate.

scholarly journals Prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction using a combined first- and second-trimester screening model in South Chinese infants: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiqing Zheng ◽  
Yan Feng ◽  
Jiexin Zhang ◽  
Kuanrong Li ◽  
Huiying Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
Second Trimester

Abstract Background: Prediction models for early and late fetal growth restriction (FGR) have been established in many high-income countries. However, prediction models for late FGR in China are limited. This study aimed to develop a simple combined first- and second-trimester prediction model for screening late-onset FGR in South Chinese infants. Methods: This retrospective study included 2258 women who had singleton pregnancies and received routine ultrasound scans as training dataset. A validation dataset including 565 pregnant women was used to evaluate the model in order to enable an unbiased estimation. Late-onset FGR was defined as a birth weight < the 10th percentile plus abnormal Doppler indices and/or a birth weight below the 3rd percentile after 32 weeks, regardless of the Doppler status. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a prediction model. The model included the a priori risk (maternal characteristics), the second-trimester head circumference (HC/AC) / abdomen circumference (HC) ratio and estimated fetal weight (EFW). Results: Ninety-three fetuses were identified as late-onset FGR. The significant predictors for late-onset FGR were maternal age, height, weight, and medical history; the second-trimester HC/ AC ratio; and the EFW. This model achieved a detection rate (DR) of 52.6% for late-onset FGR at a 10% false positive rate (FPR) (area under the curve (AUC): 0.80, 95%CI 0.76-0.85). The AUC of the validation dataset was 0.65 (95%CI 0.54-0.78). Conclusions: A multivariate model combining first- and second-trimester default tests can detect 52.6% of cases of late-onset FGR at a 10% FPR. Further studies with more screening markers are needed to improve the detection rate.

scholarly journals Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ormesher ◽  
L. Warrander ◽  
Y. Liu ◽  
S. Thomas ◽  
L. Simcox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Maternal Serum ◽  
Serum Biomarkers ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Aneuploidy Screening ◽  
Internal Validation

AbstractAbnormal maternal serum biomarkers (AMSB), identified through the aneuploidy screening programme, are frequent incidental findings in pregnancy. They are associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR), but previous studies have not examined whether this association is with early-onset (< 34 weeks) or late-onset (> 34 weeks) FGR; as a result there is no consensus on management. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and phenotype of FGR in women with AMSB and test the predictive value of placental sonographic screening to predict early-onset FGR. 1196 pregnant women with AMSB underwent a 21–24 week “placental screen” comprising fetal and placental size, and uterine artery Doppler. Multivariable regression was used to calculate a predictive model for early-onset FGR (birthweight centile < 3rd/< 10th with absent umbilical end-diastolic flow, < 34 weeks). FGR prevalence was high (10.3%), however early-onset FGR was uncommon (2.3%). Placental screening effectively identified early-onset (area under the curve (AUC) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.00), but not late-onset FGR (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.64–0.75). Internal validation demonstrated robust performance for detection/exclusion of early-onset FGR. In this cohort, utilisation of our proposed algorithm with targeted fetal growth and Doppler surveillance, compared with universal comprehensive surveillance would have avoided 1044 scans, potentiating significant cost-saving for maternity services.

DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF SELECTIVE FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION IN MONOCHORIONIC TWINS

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDUARD GRATACÓS ◽  
ELISENDA EIXARCH ◽  
FATIMA CRISPI
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Common Sense ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Abdominal Circumference ◽  
Monochorionic Twins ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight ◽  
Simple Definition

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) has been reported to occur in about 10–15% of monochorionic (MC) twins. The diagnosis of sFGR has been based on variable criteria including estimated fetal weight (EFW), abdominal circumference and/or the degree of fetal weight discordance. Recent studies tend to use a simple definition which includes the presence of an EFW less than the 10th percentile in the smaller twin. Some would argue that the intertwin fetal weight discordance should be included in the definition. Indeed this factor plays a major role in the complications presented by these cases. While the majority of cases with one fetus below the 10th percentile usually will also present with a large intertwin EFW discordance, the contrary is not always true. Thus, it is possible to find MC twins with remarkable intertwin EFW discordance but the EFW of both fetuses are still within normal ranges. Although it appears to be common sense that a large intertwin discrepancy might represent a higher risk for some of the complications described later in this review, there is no consistent evidence to support this notion. Therefore, due to its simplicity, a definition based on an EFW below 10th percentile in one twin is probably the most useful for clinical and research purposes.

The role of ultrasound in the prediction of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies: are we there yet?

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Raquel Neves ◽  
Filipa Nunes ◽  
Miguel Branco ◽  
Maria do Céu Almeida ◽  
Isabel Santos Silva
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Fetal Malformations ◽  
Twin Pregnancies

AbstractObjective:To analyze the accuracy of ultrasound prediction of birth weight discordance (BWD) and the influence of chorionicity and fetal growth restriction (FGR) on ultrasound performance.Methods:Retrospective analysis of 176 twin pregnancies at a Portuguese tertiary center, between 2008 and 2014. Last ultrasound biometry was recorded. Cases with delivery before 24 weeks, fetal malformations, interval between last ultrasound and deliver >3 weeks, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and monoamniotic pregnancies were excluded. The accuracy of prediction of BWD was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC).Results:BWD ≥20% was present in 21.6% of twin pregnancies. EBW had the best predictive performance for BWD (AUC 0.838, 95%CI 0.760–0.916), with a negative predictive value of 86.9% and a positive predictive value of 51.3%. Chorionicity did not influence ultrasound performance. None of the biometric variables analyzed was predictive of BWD in pregnancies without FGR.Conclusion:The accuracy of ultrasound in the prediction of BWD is limited, particularly in pregnancies without fetal growth restriction. Clinical decisions should not rely on BWD alone.

Physiopathology of late-onset fetal growth restriction

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward ARAUJO JÚNIOR ◽  
Ana C. ZAMARIAN ◽  
Ana C. CAETANO ◽  
Alberto B. PEIXOTO ◽  
Luciano M. NARDOZZA
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Growth Restriction

scholarly journals Consensus Definition of Fetal Growth Restriction in Intrauterine Fetal Death: A Delphi Procedure

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Maria Beune ◽  
Stefanie Elisabeth Damhuis ◽  
Wessel Ganzevoort ◽  
John Ciaran Hutchinson ◽  
Teck Yee Khong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Fetal Death ◽  
Weight Ratio ◽  
Liver Weight ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Intrauterine Fetal Death ◽  
Consensus Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Context.— Fetal growth restriction is a risk factor for intrauterine fetal death. Currently, definitions of fetal growth restriction in stillborn are heterogeneous. Objectives.— To develop a consensus definition for fetal growth restriction retrospectively diagnosed at fetal autopsy in intrauterine fetal death. Design.— A modified online Delphi survey in an international panel of experts in perinatal pathology, with feedback at group level and exclusion of nonresponders. The survey scoped all possible variables with an open question. Variables suggested by 2 or more experts were scored on a 5-point Likert scale. In subsequent rounds, inclusion of variables and thresholds were determined with a 70% level of agreement. In the final rounds, participants selected the consensus algorithm. Results.— Fifty-two experts participated in the first round; 88% (46 of 52) completed all rounds. The consensus definition included antenatal clinical diagnosis of fetal growth restriction OR a birth weight lower than third percentile OR at least 5 of 10 contributory variables (risk factors in the clinical antenatal history: birth weight lower than 10th percentile, body weight at time of autopsy lower than 10th percentile, brain weight lower than 10th percentile, foot length lower than 10th percentile, liver weight lower than 10th percentile, placental weight lower than 10th percentile, brain weight to liver weight ratio higher than 4, placental weight to birth weight ratio higher than 90th percentile, histologic or gross features of placental insufficiency/malperfusion). There was no consensus on some aspects, including how to correct for interval between fetal death and delivery. Conclusions.— A consensus-based definition of fetal growth restriction in fetal death was determined with utility to improve management and outcomes of subsequent pregnancies.

scholarly journals miR-16-5p, miR-103-3p, and miR-27b-3p as Early Peripheral Biomarkers of Fetal Growth Restriction

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Tagliaferri ◽  
Pasquale Cepparulo ◽  
Antonio Vinciguerra ◽  
Marta Campanile ◽  
Giuseppina Esposito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Maternal Blood ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fetal Hypoxia ◽  
Blood Samples

Current tests available to diagnose fetal hypoxia in-utero lack sensitivity thus failing to identify many fetuses at risk. Emerging evidence suggests that microRNAs derived from the placenta circulate in the maternal blood during pregnancy and may be used as non-invasive biomarkers for pregnancy complications. With the intent to identify putative markers of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and new therapeutic druggable targets, we examined, in maternal blood samples, the expression of a group of microRNAs, known to be regulated by hypoxia. The expression of microRNAs was evaluated in maternal plasma samples collected from (1) women carrying a preterm FGR fetus (FGR group) or (2) women with an appropriately grown fetus matched at the same gestational age (Control group). To discriminate between early- and late-onset FGR, the study population was divided into two subgroups according to the gestational age at delivery. Four microRNAs were identified as possible candidates for the diagnosis of FGR: miR-16-5p, miR-103-3p, miR-107-3p, and miR-27b-3p. All four selected miRNAs, measured by RT-PCR, resulted upregulated in FGR blood samples before the 32nd week of gestation. By contrast, miRNA103-3p and miRNA107-3p, analyzed between the 32nd and 37th week of gestation, showed lower expression in the FGR group compared to aged matched controls. Our results showed that measurement of miRNAs in maternal blood may form the basis for a future diagnostic test to determine the degree of fetal hypoxia in FGR, thus allowing the start of appropriate therapeutic interventions to alleviate the burden of this disease.

scholarly journals Early-onset fetal growth restriction defined by only abdominal circumference is associated with perinatal mortality

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S165
Author(s):  
James D. Toppin ◽  
Miranda Long ◽  
Rick Tivis ◽  
Joseph Biggio ◽  
Frank Williams
Keyword(s):  
Perinatal Mortality ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Abdominal Circumference
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document