scholarly journals Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Pilot Trial to Investigate Safety and Efficacy of Cerebrolysin in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Yat-Ming Woo ◽  
Sandy Lam ◽  
Joanna WK Ho (Dr.) ◽  
Natalie MW Ko ◽  
Ronald PT Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
P Value ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Double Blind

Abstract Background There are limited treatment options for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-induced delayed cerebral ischemia, a major determinant of mortality and morbidity. Cerebrolysin, a brain-specific pleiotropic neuroprotective agent, has been suggested to improve functional outcomes in ischemic stroke. We investigated the efficacy, safety and feasibility of Cerebrolysin for conferring such benefits in SAH patients. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel-group pilot study. 50 patients received either daily Cerebrolysin (30ml/day) or a placebo (saline) for 14 days (25 patients per study group). The primary endpoint was a favorable Extended Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSE) of 5 to 8 (moderate disability to good recovery) at six-months. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of adverse effects, six-month mortality, the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia and infarction. Results No severe adverse effects or mortality attributable to Cerebrolysin were observed. No significant difference was detected in the proportion of patients with favorable six-month GOSE in either study group (odds ratio (OR): 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-5.17). Secondary functional outcome measures for good six-month recovery indicated by a modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 (OR: 0.53; 95% CI 0.43-5.17) and a Barthel Index of 70 or more (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29-12.72) were also similar for both groups. There was a significantly lower risk of three- and six-month mortality for patients that received Cerebrolysin (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33-0.63). There were no deaths in the Cerebrolysin group, but the morality rate for the control group was 16% (4/25). The commonest cause of death was due to delayed cerebral ischemia. There were no differences in the overall incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia (p-value: 0.78), cerebral vasospasm (p-value: 0.16) and infarction (p-value: 0.77) between the two groups. Conclusions Use of Cerebrolysin in addition to standard-of-care management of aneurysmal SAH is safe, well tolerated and feasible. Results suggest a benefit in reducing three- and six-month mortality. Due to the exploratory nature of this study and its small sample size, these findings should be confirmed in a larger-scale clinical trial.

scholarly journals Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot trial to investigate safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Y. M. Woo ◽  
Joanna W. K. Ho ◽  
Natalie M. W. Ko ◽  
Ronald P. T. Li ◽  
Leo Jian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Significant Difference

Asbtract Background There are limited neuroprotective treatment options for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Cerebrolysin, a brain-specific proposed pleiotropic neuroprotective agent, has been suggested to improve global functional outcomes in ischemic stroke. We investigated the efficacy, safety and feasibility of administering Cerebrolysin for SAH patients. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel-group pilot study. Fifty patients received either daily Cerebrolysin (30 ml/day) or a placebo (saline) for 14 days (25 patients per study group). The primary endpoint was a favorable Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) of 5 to 8 (moderate disability to good recovery) at six-months. Secondary endpoints included the modified Ranking Scale (mRS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score, occurrence of adverse effects and the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Results No severe adverse effects or mortality attributable to Cerebrolysin were observed. No significant difference was detected in the proportion of patients with favorable six-month GOSE in either study group (odds ratio (OR): 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43–5.17). Secondary functional outcome measures for favorable six-month recovery i.e. a mRS of 0 to 3 (OR: 3.45; 95% CI 0.79–15.01) were comparable for both groups. Similarly, there was no difference in MOCA neurocognitive performance (p-value: 0.75) and in the incidence of DCI (OR: 0.85 95% CI: 0.28–2.59). Conclusions Use of Cerebrolysin in addition to standard-of-care management of aneurysmal SAH is safe, well tolerated and feasible. However, the neutral results of this trial suggest that it does not improve the six-month global functional performance of patients. Clinical trial registration Name of Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Trial Registration Number: NCT01787123. Date of Registration: 8th February 2013.

Cerebrospinal fluid macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a potential predictor of cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 1786-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Kwan ◽  
Orseola Arapi ◽  
Katherine E. Wagner ◽  
Julia Schneider ◽  
Heustein L. Sy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Migration Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Inhibitory Factor ◽  
Macrophage Migration ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVEIn patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), poor outcomes have been shown to be correlated with subsequent cerebral vasospasm (CV) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). The identification of novel biomarkers may aid in the prediction of which patients are vulnerable to developing vasospasm, cerebral ischemia, and neurological deterioration.METHODSIn this prospective clinical study at North Shore University Hospital, patients with aSAH or normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) with external ventricular drains were enrolled. The concentration of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in CSF was assessed for correlation with CV or DCI, the primary outcome measures.RESULTSTwenty-five patients were enrolled in the aSAH group and 9 were enrolled in the NPH group. There was a significant increase in aggregate CSF MIF concentration in patients with aSAH versus those with NPH (24.4 ± 19.2 vs 2.3 ± 1.1 ng/ml, p < 0.0002). Incidence of the day of peak MIF concentration significantly correlated with the onset of clinical vasospasm (rho = 0.778, p < 0.0010). MIF concentrations were significantly elevated in patients with versus those without evidence of DCI (18.7 ± 4.93 vs 8.86 ± 1.28 ng/ml, respectively, p < 0.0025). There was a significant difference in MIF concentrations between patients with infection versus those without infection (16.43 ± 4.21 vs 8.5 ± 1.22 ng/ml, respectively, p < 0.0119).CONCLUSIONSPreliminary evidence from this study suggests that CSF concentrations of MIF are correlated with CV and DCI. These results, however, could be confounded in the presence of clinical infection. A study with a larger patient sample size is necessary to corroborate these findings.

Abstract T P352: Dantrolene for the Prevention and Treatment of Cerebral Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Feasibility

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Muehlschlegel ◽  
Raphael Carandang ◽  
Wiley Hall ◽  
Kini Nisha ◽  
Saef Izzy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Outcome Differences ◽  
Infusion Period

Introduction: Dantrolene is neuroprotective in animal models and may attenuate cerebral vasospasm (cVSP) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in humans. We evaluated safety/tolerability and feasibility of intravenous dantrolene (IV-D) after aSAH. Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 31 patients with acute aSAH were randomized to IV-D 1.25 mg IV every 6 hours x 7 days (n=16) or placebo (n=15). Primary endpoint was incidence of hyponatremia (sNa ≤ 134 mmol/L) and liver toxicity (% patients with ALT, AST and AlkPhos >5x upper limit of normal). Secondary safety endpoints included tolerability, systemic hypotension and intracranial hypertension. Efficacy was explored by clinical, transcranial Doppler (TCD) or angiographic cVSP occurrence, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and 3-month modified-Rankin-Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale and Barthel Index. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric tests, generalized estimating equations and mixed models. Results: Between IV-D vs. placebo, no differences were observed in the primary outcome (hyponatremia: 44% vs. 67% [p=0.29]; liver toxicity 6% vs. 0% [p=1.0]). Numerically more AEs and SAEs were seen in the IV-D group, but did not reach statistical significance (16 vs. 5 AEs, of which 5 vs. 2 were severe; RR 2.2; 95% CI 0.7-6.7; p=0.16). Three IV-D vs. two placebo patients reached stop criteria: one IV-D patient developed liver toxicity; two patients in each group developed brain edema requiring osmotherapy. No differences in angiographic, TCD, clinical cVSP, DCI, or 3-month functional outcomes were seen. Quantitative angiogram analysis revealed a trend towards increased vessel diameters in the IV-D group after the 7-day infusion-period (p=0.05). Conclusion: In this small trial, IV-Dantrolene after aSAH was feasible, tolerable and safe, but was underpowered to show efficacy or outcome differences.

scholarly journals Long-acting statin for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1190-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Naraoka ◽  
Naoya Matsuda ◽  
Norihito Shimamura ◽  
Kenichiro Asano ◽  
Kenichi Akasaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Pleiotropic Effects ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Long Acting

Statins have pleiotropic effects that are considered beneficial in preventing cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Many studies using statins have been performed but failed to show remarkable effects. We hypothesized that a long-acting statin would be more effective, due to a longer half-life and stronger pleiotropic effects. Patients with aSAH were randomly assigned to a pitavastatin group (4 mg daily; n = 54) and a placebo group ( n = 54) after repair of a ruptured aneurysm. The primary efficacy end point was vasospasm-related delayed ischemic neurological deficits (DIND), and the secondary end points were cerebral vasospasm evaluated by digital subtraction angiography (DSA), vasospasm-related new cerebral infarctions, and outcome at three months. Severe cerebral vasospasms on DSA were statistically fewer in the pitavastatin group than in the placebo group (14.8% vs. 33.3%; odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.87, p = 0.042); however, the occurrence of DIND and new infarctions and outcome showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. The present study is the first to prove the definite, statin-induced amelioration of cerebral vasospasm on DSA. However, administration of any type of statin at the acute phase of aSAH is not recommended.

Comparison of Initial Vasopressors Used for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 266-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhaskar Roy ◽  
Louise D. McCullough ◽  
Rajat Dhar ◽  
James Grady ◽  
Yu-Bo Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Induced Hypertension ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
The Impact

Background: The main reason for morbidity after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). The mainstay of medical therapy for treating DCI is induced hypertension with vasopressors to restore cerebral perfusion. Both phenylephrine (PE) and norepinephrine (NE) are commonly used for induced hypertension, but the impact of the initial choice of vasopressor on the efficacy, adverse effects, or outcome after hemodynamic therapy for DCI is unknown. Methods: Sixty-three patients with aSAH between January 2012 and October 2014, who developed DCI (defined as new focal deficit or decline in Glasgow Coma Score) and in which PE (n = 45) or NE (n = 18) treatment was initiated were evaluated in this retrospective study. Baseline characteristics, adverse effects, the need to change or add vasopressors, the response to therapy, the need for endovascular therapy, new infarct development, discharge disposition, and 3 months modified Rankin score were all compared between pressor groups. Results: Baseline characteristics (e.g., Hunt Hess and Fisher grades) were similar. There were no differences in the overall rate of complications including arrhythmia, pulmonary edema, or kidney injury. However, those initiated on PE were more likely to be changed to an alternate vasopressor (64 vs. 33%, p = 0.016), mostly for bradycardia or failure to reach therapeutic targets. Patients initially treated with PE were less likely to respond neurologically (71 vs. 94%, p = 0.01) or to be discharged to home or acute rehabilitation facilities (73 vs. 94%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to have a delayed infarct on imaging (62 vs. 33%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our study suggests that patients with DCI after aSAH initiated on PE are more likely to require treatment change to another vasopressor and are at greater risk for poor clinical outcomes compared to patients started on NE. Larger comparative studies are warranted.

A phase II randomized controlled trial of tiopronin for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-359
Author(s):  
Natasha Ironside ◽  
Brandon Christophe ◽  
Samuel Bruce ◽  
Amanda M. Carpenter ◽  
Trae Robison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration

OBJECTIVEDelayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a significant contributor to poor outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The neurotoxin 3-aminopropanal (3-AP) is upregulated in cerebral ischemia. This phase II clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of tiopronin in reducing CSF 3-AP levels in patients with aSAH.METHODSIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial, 60 patients were assigned to receive tiopronin or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Treatment was commenced within 96 hours after aSAH onset, administered at a dose of 3 g daily, and continued until 14 days after aSAH or hospital discharge, whichever occurred earlier. The primary efficacy outcome was the CSF 3-AP level at 7 ± 1 days after aSAH.RESULTSOf the 60 enrolled patients, 29 (97%) and 27 (93%) in the tiopronin and placebo arms, respectively, received more than one dose of the study drug or placebo. At post-aSAH day 7 ± 1, CSF samples were available in 41% (n = 12/29) and 48% (n = 13/27) of patients in the tiopronin and placebo arms, respectively. No difference in CSF 3-AP levels at post-aSAH day 7 ± 1 was observed between the study arms (11 ± 12 nmol/mL vs 13 ± 18 nmol/mL; p = 0.766). Prespecified adverse events led to early treatment cessation for 4 patients in the tiopronin arm and 2 in the placebo arm.CONCLUSIONSThe power of this study was affected by missing data. Therefore, the authors could not establish or refute an effect of tiopronin on CSF 3-AP levels. Additional observational studies investigating the role of 3-AP as a biomarker for DCI may be warranted prior to its use as a molecular target in future clinical trials.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01095731 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document