scholarly journals Identifying and prioritizing requirements for an e-platform to strengthen nursing in Kazakhstan A two-step research design including a literature review and a Delphi study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bea Dijkman ◽  
Alberta Oosterhoff ◽  
Amangali Akanov ◽  
Wolter Paans

Abstract BACKGROUND This paper addresses the requirements for an e-platform that is to be developed to strengthen nursing in Kazakhstan. It aims to support knowledge sharing and collaboration in nursing education, research, and clinical practice. To construct the platform, a requirement analysis was conducted in a two-step design that included a literature review and a Delphi study. The aim of the review was to identify requirements for an e-platform for collaborative developments in nursing science and nursing research education. The aim of the Delphi study was to specifically prioritize these requirements for Kazakhstan.METHODS A literature search was accomplished using different electronic databases between February and April 2018 by applying search terms concerning nursing, e-platform, research, and education. Included studies should not be older than six years, written in English or Russian, involve nurses or nursing students, and address learning by e-platform. The Delphi study included two rounds of questionnaires containing input from the review and from other project activities. Rating occurred among a panel of experts from Kazakhstan, Finland, and the Netherlands. Outcomes were analysed applying content validity ratios and level of consensus thresholds.RESULTS The literature search generated eight studies. Data extraction and synthesis resulted in nine categories of requirements covered by four groups in the Delphi study. One group contains content-related requirements encompassing aim and users, platform structure, educational content, and nursing skills. Another group comprises functional requirements including communication, knowledge acquisition, and management. A third group refers to usability requirements, and the fourth group contains technical requirements. The Delphi study generated a list of 52 essential requirements and 15 useful requirements with a high level of consensus.CONCLUSION The input for the Delphi corresponded with the perceptions of experts concerning the needs of the e-platform to be developed. The list of requirements is well-embedded in the literature as well as in the national context of nursing in Kazakhstan and, therefore, will contribute to improving the trinity of nursing education, research, and practice. Although the list is context-specific, when validated by a panel of experts, it is considered to be applicable universally when developing e-platforms for nursing.

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-282
Author(s):  
Sherry A. Burrell ◽  
Jennifer Gunberg Ross ◽  
Mary Ann Heverly ◽  
Tina M. Menginie

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry A. Burrell ◽  
Jennifer Gunberg Ross ◽  
MaryAnn Heverly ◽  
Bette Mariani

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry A. Burrell ◽  
Jennifer Gunberg Ross ◽  
Mary Ann Heverly ◽  
Bette Mariani

Background and PurposeWhile nursing students' attitudes about research are generally positive, little is known about their attitudes toward education research. The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the newly developed Nursing Students' Attitudes toward Nursing Education Research Questionnaire (NSANERQ).MethodsThe 25-item NSANERQ was adapted from an existing tool measuring nursing students' attitudes toward nursing research. Content and construct validity, and internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated. Content validity was assessed using a panel of five experts. Internal consistency reliability and construct validity were assessed in a sample of 156 senior, junior, and sophomore baccalaureate nursing students with a mean age of 20.55 years. A separate sample of 49 freshmen baccalaureate nursing students with a mean age of 18.35 years was used to assess test–retest reliability. Both samples were predominantly female, White, and non-Hispanic/non-Latino.ResultsThe NSANERQ demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI = 0.92), good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.88), and acceptable test–retest reliability (r = 0.71) over 2 weeks. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a six-factor solution, which was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis.ConclusionsThe NSANERQ is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to measure students' attitudes toward nursing education research.


Author(s):  
Tammy Lynn McClenny

AbstractObjectivePhenomenography is a qualitative research method used to explore the different ways individuals experience phenomena. Over the last few decades, use of the research method grew in various higher education disciplines; however, use of the method for nursing education research was limited until early in the 21st century.Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe the main ideas of phenomenography methodology and provide a simplified integrative review of the contributions to nursing education research.MethodsWhittemore and Knafl (2005) five-step integrative review process was used to guide the literature search and evaluate findings of published works between 2009 and 2019.ResultsThirteen articles, including one comprehensive literature review, were identified in the literature search.ConclusionFindings illustrated phenomenography methodology was used to evaluate and improve teaching and learning principles, complex faculty and student issues, curriculum and professional development, and educational practices within nursing education. Phenomenography research can be instrumental in providing a more realistic worldview of individual differing experiences of nursing education phenomena.


2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 363-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Flynn ◽  
Pamela Ironside ◽  
Michael Yedidia ◽  
Christine A. Tanner ◽  
Theresa (Terry) Valiga

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document