scholarly journals Comparison of Healthcare Utilization and Out-of-pocket Expenditure for Severe Disease by Health Security System: based on End-stage Renal Disease in South Korea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Mi Shin
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Health Security ◽  
Medical Aid ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract Background: Korea's health security system named National Health Insurance and Medical Aid has revolutionized the nation's mandatory health insurance and continues to reduce excessive copayments. However, few have been studied on healthcare utilization and expenditure according to the health security system in case of severe disease. This study looked at reverse discrimination within End-Stage Renal Disease between National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. Methods: Subjects were a total of 305 diagnosed with End-Stage Renal Disease in Korea Health Panel from 2008 to 2013. Chi-square, t-test, and ANCOVA were conducted to identify healthcare utilization rate, out-of-pocket expenditure, and catastrophic expenditure rate. Fixed effect panel analysis was used to evaluate total out-of-pocket expenditure over a 6-year trend by National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. Results: There were no significant differences in healthcare utilization rate in emergency-room visits, admission, or out-patient department visits between National Health Insurance and Medical Aid because healthcare service was essential for a serious disease such as End-Stage Renal Disease. Meanwhile, each out-of-pocket expenditure for admission and out-patient department in National Health Insurance was 2.6 and 3.1 times higher than Medical Aid (P<0.05). A total of out-of-pocket expenditure including emergency-room visits, admission, out-patient department visits, and prescribed drug expenditure was 2.9 times higher in National Health Insurance than those of Medical Aid (P<0.001). Over a 6-year trend for a total of out-of-pocket expenditure, subjects with National Health Insurance spent more than those of Medical Aid (P<0.01). If annual household gross income was less than the median and subjects were covered by National Health Insurance, the catastrophic health expenditure rate was 85.9%, but 47.1% in Medical Aid (P<0.001). Conclusion: Serious disease such as End-Stage Renal Disease can result in reverse discrimination depending on the type of health security system. It is necessary to consider those who belong to National Health Insurance but are still poor. Key words: National Health Insurance, Medical Aid, Healthcare utilization, Out-of-pocket expenditure, End-stage Renal Disease, Catastrophic health expenditure

scholarly journals Comparison of Out-of-pocket Expenditure and Catastrophic Health Expenditure  for Severe Disease by Health Security System: based on End-stage Renal Disease in South Korea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Mi Shin ◽  
Hee Woo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Security System ◽  
Health Security ◽  
Medical Aid ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract Background: Korea's health security system named National Health Insurance and Medical Aid has revolutionized the nation's mandatory health insurance and continues to reduce excessive copayments. However, few have been studied on healthcare utilization and expenditure according to the health security system in case of severe disease. This study looked at reverse discrimination within End-stage Renal Disease between National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. Methods: Subjects were a total of 305 diagnosed with End-stage Renal Disease in Korea Health Panel from 2008 to 2013. Chi-square, t-test, and ANCOVA were conducted to identify healthcare utilization rate, out-of-pocket expenditure, and prevalence of catastrophic expenditure. Mixed effect panel analysis was used to evaluate total out-of-pocket expenditure over a 6-year trend by National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. Results: There were no significant differences in healthcare utilization rate in emergency-room visits, admission, or out-patient department visits between National Health Insurance and Medical Aid because healthcare service was essential for a serious disease such as End-stage Renal Disease. Meanwhile, each out-of-pocket expenditure for admission and out-patient department in National Health Insurance was 2.6 and 3.1 times higher than Medical Aid (P<0.05). A total of out-of-pocket expenditure including emergency-room visits, admission, out-patient department visits, and prescribed drug expenditure was 2.9 times higher in National Health Insurance than those of Medical Aid (P<0.001). Over a 6-year trend for a total of out-of-pocket expenditure, subjects with National Health Insurance spent more than those of Medical Aid (P<0.01). If total household income decile was less than the median and subjects were covered by National Health Insurance, the catastrophic health expenditure rate was 92.2%, but 58.8% in Medical Aid (P<0.001). Conclusion: Serious disease such as End-stage Renal Disease can result in reverse discrimination depending on the type of health security system. It is necessary to consider those who belong to National Health Insurance but are still poor.

scholarly journals Comparison of Out-of-pocket Expenditure and Catastrophic Health Expenditure for Severe Disease by the Health Security System: Based on End-stage Renal Disease in South Korea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Mi Shin ◽  
Hee Woo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Security System ◽  
Health Security ◽  
Medical Aid ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract Background: Korea's health security system named the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid has revolutionized the nation's mandatory health insurance and continues to reduce excessive copayments. However, few studies have examined healthcare utilization and expenditure by the health security system for severe diseases. This study looked at reverse discrimination regarding end-stage renal disease by the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid.Methods: A total of 305 subjects were diagnosed with end-stage renal disease in the Korea Health Panel from 2008 to 2013. Chi-square, t-test, and ANCOVA were conducted to identify the healthcare utilization rate, out-of-pocket expenditure, and the prevalence of catastrophic expenditure. Mixed effect panel analysis was used to evaluate total out-of-pocket expenditure by the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid over a 6-year period.Results: There were no significant differences in the healthcare utilization rate for emergency room visits, admissions, or outpatient department visits between the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid because these healthcare services were essential for individuals with serious diseases, such as end-stage renal disease. Meanwhile, each out-of-pocket expenditure for an admission and the outpatient department by the National Health Insurance was 2.6 and 3.1 times higher than that of Medical Aid (P<0.05). The total out-of-pocket expenditure, including that for emergency room visits, admission, outpatient department visits, and prescribed drugs, was 2.9 times higher for the National Health Insurance than Medical Aid (P<0.001). Over a 6-year period, in terms of total of out-of-pocket expenditure, subjects with the National Health Insurance spent more than those with Medical Aid (P<0.01). If the total household income decile was less than the median and subjects were covered by the National Health Insurance, the catastrophic health expenditure rate was 92.2%, but it was only 58.8% for Medical Aid (P<0.001).Conclusion: Individuals with serious diseases, such as end-stage renal disease, can be faced with reverse discrimination depending on the type of insurance that is provided by the health security system. It is necessary to consider individuals who have National Health Insurance but are still poor.

scholarly journals Comparison of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure and Catastrophic Health Expenditure  for Severe Disease by Health Security System: based on End-stage Renal Disease in South Korea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Mi Shin ◽  
Hee Woo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Security System ◽  
Health Security ◽  
Medical Aid ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract Background: Korea's health security system named National Health Insurance and Medical Aid has revolutionized the nation's mandatory health insurance and continues to reduce excessive copayments. However, few have been studied on healthcare utilization and expenditure according to the health security system in case of severe disease. This study looked at reverse discrimination within end-stage renal disease between National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. Methods: Subjects were a total of 305 diagnosed with end-stage renal disease in Korea Health Panel from 2008 to 2013. Chi-square, t-test, and ANCOVA were conducted to identify healthcare utilization rate, out-of-pocket expenditure, and prevalence of catastrophic expenditure. Mixed effect panel analysis was used to evaluate total out-of-pocket expenditure over a 6-year trend by National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. Results: There were no significant differences in healthcare utilization rate in emergency-room visits, admission, or out-patient department visits between National Health Insurance and Medical Aid because healthcare service was essential for a serious disease such as End-stage Renal Disease.Meanwhile, each out-of-pocket expenditure for admission and out-patient department in National Health Insurance was 2.6 and 3.1 times higher than Medical Aid (P<0.05). A total of out-of-pocket expenditure including emergency-room visits, admission, out-patient department visits, and prescribed drug expenditure was 2.9 times higher in National Health Insurance than those of Medical Aid (P<0.001). Over a 6-year trend for a total of out-of-pocket expenditure, subjects with National Health Insurance spent more than those of Medical Aid (P<0.01). If total household income decile was less than the median and subjects were covered by National Health Insurance, the catastrophic health expenditure rate was 92.2%, but 58.8% in Medical Aid (P<0.001). Conclusion: Serious disease such as end-stage renal disease can result in reverse discrimination depending on the type of health security system. It is necessary to consider those who belong to National Health Insurance but are still poor.

scholarly journals Comparison of out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health expenditure for severe disease by the health security system: based on end-stage renal disease in South Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Mi Shin ◽  
Hee Woo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Security System ◽  
Health Security ◽  
Medical Aid ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract Background Korea’s health security system named the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid has revolutionized the nation’s mandatory health insurance and continues to reduce excessive copayments. However, few studies have examined healthcare utilization and expenditure by the health security system for severe diseases. This study looked at reverse discrimination regarding end-stage renal disease by the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. Methods A total of 305 subjects were diagnosed with end-stage renal disease in the Korea Health Panel from 2008 to 2013. Chi-square, t-test, and ANCOVA were conducted to identify the healthcare utilization rate, out-of-pocket expenditure, and the prevalence of catastrophic expenditure. Mixed effect panel analysis was used to evaluate total out-of-pocket expenditure by the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid over a 6-year period. Results There were no significant differences in the healthcare utilization rate for emergency room visits, admissions, or outpatient department visits between the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid because these healthcare services were essential for individuals with serious diseases, such as end-stage renal disease. Meanwhile, each out-of-pocket expenditure for an admission and the outpatient department by the National Health Insurance was 2.6 and 3.1 times higher than that of Medical Aid (P < 0.05). The total out-of-pocket expenditure, including that for emergency room visits, admission, outpatient department visits, and prescribed drugs, was 2.9 times higher for the National Health Insurance than Medical Aid (P < 0.001). Over a 6-year period, in terms of total of out-of-pocket expenditure, subjects with the National Health Insurance spent more than those with Medical Aid (P < 0.01). If the total household income decile was less than the median and subjects were covered by the National Health Insurance, the catastrophic health expenditure rate was 92.2%, but it was only 58.8% for Medical Aid (P < 0.001). Conclusion Individuals with serious diseases, such as end-stage renal disease, can be faced with reverse discrimination depending on the type of insurance that is provided by the health security system. It is necessary to consider individuals who have National Health Insurance but are still poor.

Current Status of Diabetic End-Stage Renal Disease Using Korean Health Insurance Database

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Jung Kim ◽  
Jaiyong Kim ◽  
Hyeyoung Kim ◽  
Kyung Wan Min ◽  
Seok Won Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Health Insurance Database ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Insurance Database

scholarly journals Health care trajectories and barriers to treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease without health insurance in Mexico: a mixed methods approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Agudelo-Botero ◽  
María Cecilia González-Robledo ◽  
Hortensia Reyes-Morales ◽  
Liliana Giraldo-Rodríguez ◽  
Mario Rojas-Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Barriers To Treatment ◽  
Mixed Methods Approach ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

scholarly journals Permanent vascular access in patients with end-stage renal disease, Brazil

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Macedo da Silva ◽  
Isabel Cristina Gomes ◽  
Eli Iola Gurgel Andrade ◽  
Eleonora Moreira Lima ◽  
Francisco de Assis Acurcio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Private Health Insurance ◽  
Access Time ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with the establishment of permanent vascular access for patients with end-stage renal disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in a nationally representative sample of Brazilian end-stage renal disease patients in dialysis and transplant centers during 2007. The sample comprised only patients who received hemodialysis as a primary therapy modality and reported the type of vascular access for their primary hemodialysis treatment (N=2,276). Data were from the TRS Project - "Economic and Epidemiologic Evaluation of Modalities of Renal Replacement Therapy in Brazil". Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with the establishment of permanent vascular access in these patients. RESULTS: About 30% of the patients studied had an arteriovenous vascular access. The following factors were associated with a lower likelihood of having an arteriovenous vascular access as a primary type of access: time of hemodialysis start since the diagnosis of chronic renal failure < 1 year; shorter dialysis therapy; having no private health insurance; living in the central-western, northeastern and southeastern regions of Brazil; and living in the northern region plus having no private health insurance. In the final model there was found a positive association between the outcome and pre-dialysis care and no were association with socioeconomic and comorbidity variables. CONCLUSIONS: The study results showed that the focus should on pre-dialysis care to increase the establishment of an arteriovenous vascular access before starting hemodialysis in Brazil.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document