scholarly journals VIBRA trial – Effect of village-based refill of ART following home-based same-day ART initiation vs clinic-based ART refill on viral suppression among individuals living with HIV: protocol of a cluster-randomized clinical trial in rural Lesotho

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Amstutz ◽  
Thabo Ishmael Lejone ◽  
Lefu Khesa ◽  
Josephine Muhairwe ◽  
Bienvenu Lengo Nsakala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Southern Africa ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Art Initiation ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Village Health ◽  
Art Delivery

Abstract Background: There is a need for evaluating community-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models to improve overall performance of HIV programs, specifically in populations that may have difficulties to access continuous care. This cluster-randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent differentiated ART delivery model (VIBRA model) after home-based same-day ART initiation in remote villages in Lesotho, Southern Africa. Methods: VIBRA (Village-Based Refill of ART) trial is a cluster-randomized, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial conducted in two districts of Lesotho, Southern Africa. Clusters (i.e. villages) are randomly assigned to either the VIBRA model or standard of care, stratified by district, village size, and village access to the nearest health facility. Eligible individuals (HIV-positive, aged 10 years or older, not taking ART) found during community-based HIV testing campaigns are offered same-day home-based ART initiation. Intervention clusters offer a differentiated ART delivery package with two features: Firstly, drug-refill and follow-up through trained and supervised village health workers. Secondly, the option of receiving individually tailored adherence reminders and viral load result notifications via SMS. Standard of care applies for the control clusters, i.e. ART visits at the clinic and no SMS. The primary endpoint is viral suppression 12 months after enrolment. Secondary endpoints include linkage to and engagement in care. Furthermore, safety and cost-effectiveness analyses plus qualitative research are planned. Minimum target sample size is 262 participants. Statistical analyses will follow CONSORT guidelines. VIBRA trial is linked to another trial, the HOSENG (HOme-based SElf-testiNG) trial, in the GET ON (GETing tOwards Ninety) research project. Discussion: VIBRA trial is among the first to evaluate ART delivery through VHW immediately after ART-initiation and it assesses the entire HIV care cascade from testing to viral suppression. As most countries in sub-Saharan Africa have cadres similar to the VHW program in Lesotho, this model – if shown to be effective – has potential to be scaled up. The system impact evaluation will provide valuable cost estimations, and the qualitative research will suggest how the model could further be modified to optimize impact. Trial Registration: This trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03630549) on August 15, 2018. Keywords: HIV, cluster randomized controlled trial, village health worker, community health worker, home-based, differentiated care and delivery, antiretroviral therapy, Lesotho, Southern Africa, multi component intervention.

scholarly journals VIBRA trial – Effect of village-based refill of ART following home-based same-day ART initiation vs clinic-based ART refill on viral suppression among individuals living with HIV: protocol of a cluster-randomized clinical trial in rural Lesotho

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Amstutz ◽  
Thabo Ishmael Lejone ◽  
Lefu Khesa ◽  
Josephine Muhairwe ◽  
Bienvenu Lengo Nsakala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Southern Africa ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Art Initiation ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Art Delivery

Abstract BACKGROUND There is a need for evaluating community-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery models to improve overall performance of HIV programs, specifically in populations that may have difficulties to access continuous care. This cluster-randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent differentiated ART delivery model (VIBRA model) after home-based same-day ART initiation in remote villages in Lesotho, Southern Africa. METHODS VIBRA (Village-Based Refill of ART) trial is a cluster-randomized, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial conducted in two districts of Lesotho, Southern Africa. Clusters (i.e. villages) are randomly as-signed to either the VIBRA model or standard of care, stratified by district, village size, and village access to the nearest health facility. Eligible individuals (HIV-positive, aged 10 years or older, not taking ART) found during community-based HIV testing campaigns are offered same-day home-based ART initiation. Intervention clusters offer a differentiated ART delivery package with two fea-tures: Firstly, drug-refill and follow-up through trained and supervised village health workers (VHW). Secondly, the option of receiving individually tailored adherence reminders and viral load result notifications via SMS. Standard of care applies for the control clusters, i.e. ART visits at the clinic and no SMS. The primary endpoint is viral suppression 12 months after enrolment. Second-ary endpoints include linkage to and engagement in care. Furthermore, safety and cost-effectiveness analyses plus qualitative research are planned. Minimum target sample size is 262 participants. Statistical analyses will follow CONSORT guidelines. VIBRA trial is linked to another trial, the HOSENG (HOme-based SElf-testiNG) trial, in the GET ON (GETing tOwards Ninety) re-search project. DISCUSSION VIBRA trial is among the first to evaluate ART delivery through VHW immediately after ART-initiation and it assesses the entire HIV care cascade from testing to viral suppression. As most countries in sub-Saharan Africa have cadres similar to the VHW program in Lesotho, this model – if shown to be effective – has potential to be scaled up. The system impact evaluation will provide valuable cost estimations, and the qualitative research will suggest how the model could further be modified to optimize impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03630549) on August 15, 2018.

scholarly journals A comparison of different community models of antiretroviral therapy delivery with the standard of care among stable HIV+ patients: rationale and design of a non-inferiority cluster randomized trial, nested in the HPTN 071 (PopART) study

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Limbada ◽  
◽  
Chiti Bwalya ◽  
David Macleod ◽  
Sian Floyd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Community Based Interventions ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Resource Limited Settings ◽  
Hiv Patients ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Art Delivery

Abstract Background Following the World Health Organization’s (WHO) 2015 guidelines recommending initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) irrespective of CD4 count for all people living with HIV (PLHIV), many countries in sub-Saharan Africa have adopted this strategy to reach epidemic control. As the number of PLHIV on ART rises, maintenance of viral suppression on ART for over 90% of PLHIV remains a challenge to government health systems in resource-limited high HIV burden settings. Non facility-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery for stable HIV+ patients may increase sustainable ART coverage in resource-limited settings. Within the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial, two models, home-based delivery (HBD) or adherence clubs (AC), were offered to assess whether they achieved similar viral load suppression (VLS) to standard of care (SoC). In this paper, we describe the trial design and discuss the methodological issues and challenges. Methods A three-arm cluster randomized non-inferiority trial, nested in two urban HPTN 071 trial communities in Zambia, randomly allocated 104 zones to SoC (35), HBD (35), or AC (34). ART and adherence support were delivered 3-monthly at home (HBD), adherence clubs (AC), or clinic (SoC). Adult HIV+ patients defined as “stable” on ART were eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of PLHIV with virological suppression (≤ 1000 copies HIV RNA/ml) at 12 months (± 3months) after study entry across all three arms. Viral load measurement was done at the routine government laboratories in accordance with national guidelines, annually. The study was powered to determine if either of the community-based interventions would yield a viral suppression rate drop compared to SoC of no more than 5% in its absolute value. Both community-based interventions were delivered by community HIV providers (CHiPs). An additional qualitative study using observations, interviews with PLHIV, and FGDs with community HIV providers was nested in this study to complement the quantitative data. Discussion This trial was designed to provide rigorous randomized evidence of safety and efficacy of non-facility-based delivery of ART for stable PLHIV in high-burden resource-limited settings. This trial will inform policy regarding best practices and what is needed to strengthen scale-up of differentiated models of ART delivery in resource-limited settings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03025165. Registered on 19 January 2017

scholarly journals 880. Interim Analysis of Real-World Community-Based HIV Rapid Start Antiretroviral with BFTAF Versus Conventional HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Start – The RoCHaCHa Study, A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S531-S532
Author(s):  
Ashley R Zuppelli ◽  
Jacob Scutaru ◽  
Alexandra Danforth ◽  
Robert Biernbaum ◽  
Roberto Corales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Retention In Care ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Art Initiation ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
Historical Controls ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Trillium Health (TH) is a Federally Qualified Health Center look-alike and Ryan White C grantee in Rochester, NY providing primary and specialty care, including HIV prevention and treatment. Rapid Start Antiretroviral therapy (RSA) has been shown to decrease time to viral suppression while increasing linkage to and retention in care. However, data on a fixed-dose combination of BFTAF with these benefits are limited. We aim to show RSA with BFTAF time to viral suppression, adherence to medication, and retention in care is statistically significant in comparison to older treatment models. Additionally, we aim to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of RSA with BFTAF. Methods This is an interim analysis of participants who enrolled in the study and been in care at TH for at least 3 months as of May 2021. All participants complete a baseline assessment and start BFTAF. Follow up visits are conducted through 48 weeks. Primary and secondary endpoints are included in the attached table 2 Barriers to care and patient reported outcomes were evaluated through a standardized questionnaire at the final study visit. Study results were compared with non-RSA historical control data from patients who received standard of care universal ART initiation at TH. Results Thirty-four participants have been enrolled in the study for at least 12 weeks, 33 (97%) of whom have reached and maintained viral suppression. Twenty-one participants have completed all 48 weeks, with 20 (95%) reaching and maintaining viral suppression. In comparison to historical controls, the RSA study participants had a statistically significant shorter time to viral suppression, both from diagnosis and from ART initiation. The RSA patients had statistically significant higher retention at 12, 24, and 48 weeks in comparison to historical controls. Adherence was higher in the RSA patients, though not statistically significant. Enrollment Graphic for the Rochacha Study Baseline Demographics of Study Participants and Controls Clinical Outcomes of Study Participants compared to Controls Conclusion Our data show that RSA with BFTAF can be effective in a community based health center setting in participants facing barriers to care. The patients who were treated by RSA with BFTAF had a high viral suppression rate. To date, no BFTAF regimen had to be changed due to resistance or virologic failure in this study. These data support implementation of RSA with BFTAF as standard of care. Disclosures Ashley R. Zuppelli, PHARMD, BCACP, AAHIVP, Gilead Sciences (Research Grant or Support) Robert Biernbaum, DO, MS, FAAEM, AAHIVS, Gilead Sciences (Research Grant or Support) Roberto Corales, DO, AAHIVS, Gilead Sciences (Employee, Scientific Research Study Investigator) Shealynn Hilliard, MS, Gilead Sciences (Research Grant or Support) William M. Valenti, MD, FIDSA, Gilead Sciences (Research Grant or Support)

scholarly journals Effects of community-based antiretroviral therapy initiation models on HIV treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. e1003646
Author(s):  
Ingrid Eshun-Wilson ◽  
Ajibola A. Awotiwon ◽  
Ashley Germann ◽  
Sophia A. Amankwaa ◽  
Nathan Ford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Facility ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hiv Treatment ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Art ◽  
Art Initiation

Background Antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation in the community and outside of a traditional health facility has the potential to improve linkage to ART, decongest health facilities, and minimize structural barriers to attending HIV services among people living with HIV (PLWH). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of offering ART initiation in the community on HIV treatment outcomes. Methods and findings We searched databases between 1 January 2013 and 22 February 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared offering ART initiation in a community setting to offering ART initiation in a traditional health facility or alternative community setting. We assessed risk of bias, reporting of implementation outcomes, and real-world relevance and used Mantel–Haenszel methods to generate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) with 95% confidence intervals. We evaluated heterogeneity qualitatively and quantitatively and used GRADE to evaluate overall evidence certainty. Searches yielded 4,035 records, resulting in 8 included studies—4 RCTs and 4 observational studies—conducted in Lesotho, South Africa, Nigeria, Uganda, Malawi, Tanzania, and Haiti—a total of 11,196 PLWH. Five studies were conducted in general HIV populations, 2 in key populations, and 1 in adolescents. Community ART initiation strategies included community-based HIV testing coupled with ART initiation at home or at community venues; 5 studies maintained ART refills in the community, and 4 provided refills at the health facility. All studies were pragmatic, but in most cases provided additional resources. Few studies reported on implementation outcomes. All studies showed higher ART uptake in community initiation arms compared to facility initiation and refill arms (standard of care) (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.45; RD 30%, 95% CI 10% to 50%; 5 studies). Retention (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.54; RD 19%, 95% CI 11% to 28%; 4 studies) and viral suppression (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.49; RD 15%, 95% CI 10% to 21%; 3 studies) at 12 months were also higher in the community-based ART initiation arms. Improved uptake, retention, and viral suppression with community ART initiation were seen across population subgroups—including men, adolescents, and key populations. One study reported no difference in retention and viral suppression at 2 years. There were limited data on adherence and mortality. Social harms and adverse events appeared to be minimal and similar between community care and standard of care. One study compared ART refill strategies following community ART initiation (community versus facility refills), and found no difference in viral suppression (RD −7%, 95% CI −19% to 6%) or retention at 12 months (RD −12%, 95% CI −23% to 0.3%). This systematic review was limited by there being overall few studies for inclusion, poor-quality observational data, and short-term outcomes. Conclusions Based on data from a limited set of studies, community ART initiation appears to result in higher ART uptake, retention, and viral suppression at 1 year compared to facility-based ART initiation. Implementation on a wider scale necessitates broader exploration of costs, logistics, and acceptability by providers and PLWH to ensure that these effects are reproducible when delivered at scale, in different contexts, and over time.

scholarly journals HOSENG trial – Effect of the provision of oral self-testing for absent and refusing individuals during a door-to-door HIV testing campaign on testing coverage: protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial in rural Lesotho

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Amstutz ◽  
Thabo Ishmael Lejone ◽  
Lefu Khesa ◽  
Josephine Muhairwe ◽  
Bienvenu Lengo Nsakala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Health Worker ◽  
Health Facility ◽  
Southern Africa ◽  
Village Health Worker ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Self Testing ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Testing Coverage ◽  
Village Health

Abstract BACKGROUND: HIV testing coverage remains below the targeted 90% despite efforts and resources invested into testing in sub-Saharan Africa. Home-based HIV testing is a key approach endorsed by the World Health Organization, especially to reach individuals who might not seek testing otherwise. Although acceptance of testing during such campaigns is high, coverage remains low due to absent house-hold members. This cluster-randomized trial aims to assess increase in testing coverage using oral HIV self-testing among individuals who are absent or decline testing during home-based HIV testing. METHODS: The HOSENG (HOme-based SElf-testiNG) trial is a cluster-randomized, parallel group, superiority trial in two districts of Lesotho, Southern Africa. Clusters are stratified by district, village size, and village access to the nearest health facility. Cluster eligibility criteria include: village is in catchment area of one of the study facilities, village authority provides consent, and village has a registered, capable and consenting village health worker. In intervention clusters, HIV self-tests are provided for eligible household members who are absent or decline HIV testing in presence of the campaign team. In control clusters, standard of care for absent and refusing individuals applies, i.e. referral to health facility. The primary outcome is HIV testing coverage among individuals ≥12 years of age within 120 days after enrolment. Secondary objectives include HIV testing coverage among other age groups, and uptake of the different testing modalities. Statistical analyses will be conducted and reported in line with CONSORT guidelines. HOSENG trial is linked to VIBRA (Village-Based Refill of ART) trial. Together, they constitute the GET ON (GETting tOwards Ninety) research project. DISCUSSION: The HOSENG trial tests if oral HIVST may be an add-on during door-to-door testing campaigns towards achieving optimal testing coverage. The provision of oral self-test kits, followed up by VHWs, requires little additional human resources, finances and logistics. If cost-effective, this approach will inform home-based HIV testing policies not only in Lesotho, but in similar international settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03598686) on July 25, 2018. More information under www.getonproject.wordpress.com. KEYWORDS: HIV, cluster randomized controlled trial, village health worker, community health worker, community-based, self-testing, HIV testing coverage, Lesotho, Southern Africa, implementation research.

scholarly journals Offering ART refill through community health workers versus clinic-based follow-up after home-based same-day ART initiation in rural Lesotho: The VIBRA cluster-randomized clinical trial

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. e1003839
Author(s):  
Alain Amstutz ◽  
Thabo Ishmael Lejone ◽  
Lefu Khesa ◽  
Mathebe Kopo ◽  
Mpho Kao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Engagement In Care ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Art Initiation ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Background Community-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) dispensing by lay workers is an important differentiated service delivery model in sub-Sahara Africa. However, patients new in care are generally excluded from such models. Home-based same-day ART initiation is becoming widespread practice, but linkage to the clinic is challenging. The pragmatic VIBRA (Village-Based Refill of ART) trial compared ART refill by existing lay village health workers (VHWs) versus clinic-based refill after home-based same-day ART initiation. Methods and findings The VIBRA trial is a cluster-randomized open-label clinical superiority trial conducted in 249 rural villages in the catchment areas of 20 health facilities in 2 districts (Butha-Buthe and Mokhotlong) in Lesotho. In villages (clusters) randomized to the intervention arm, individuals found to be HIV-positive during a door-to-door HIV testing campaign were offered same-day ART initiation with the option of refill by VHWs. The trained VHWs dispensed drugs and scheduled clinic visits for viral load measurement at 6 and 12 months. In villages randomized to the control arm, participants were offered same-day ART initiation with clinic-based ART refill. The primary outcome was 12-month viral suppression. Secondary endpoints included linkage and 12-month engagement in care. Analyses were intention-to-treat. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03630549). From 16 August 2018 until 28 May 2019, 118 individuals from 108 households in 57 clusters in the intervention arm, and 139 individuals from 130 households in 60 clusters in the control arm, were enrolled (150 [58%] female; median age 36 years [interquartile range 30–48]; 200 [78%] newly diagnosed). In the intervention arm, 48/118 (41%) opted for VHW refill. At 12 months, 46/118 (39%) participants in the intervention arm and 64/139 (46%) in the control arm achieved viral suppression (adjusted risk difference −0.07 [95% CI −0.20 to 0.06]; p = 0.256). Arms were similar in linkage (adjusted risk difference 0.03 [−0.10 to 0.16]; p = 0.630), but engagement in care was non-significantly lower in the intervention arm (adjusted risk difference −0.12 [−0.23 to 0.003]; p = 0.058). Seven and 0 deaths occurred in the intervention and control arm, respectively. Of the intervention participants who did not opt for drug refill from the VHW at enrollment, 41/70 (59%) mentioned trust or conflict issues as the primary reason. Study limitations include a rather small sample size, 9% missing viral load measurements in the primary endpoint window, the low uptake of the VHW refill option in the intervention arm, and substantial migration among the study population. Conclusions The offer of village-based ART refill after same-day initiation led to similar outcomes as clinic-based refill. The intervention did not amplify the effect of home-based same-day ART initiation alone. The findings raise concerns about acceptance and safety of ART delivered by lay health workers after initiation in the community. Trial registration Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03630549).

scholarly journals Community intervention for child tuberculosis active contact investigation and management: study protocol for a parallel cluster randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anca Vasiliu ◽  
Sabrina Eymard-Duvernay ◽  
Boris Tchounga ◽  
Daniel Atwine ◽  
Elisabete de Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Preventive Therapy ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Eligible Child ◽  
Contact Investigation ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Index Cases

Abstract Background There are major gaps in the management of pediatric tuberculosis (TB) contact investigation for rapid identification of active tuberculosis and initiation of preventive therapy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a community-based intervention as compared to facility-based model for the management of children in contact with bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary TB adults in low-resource high-burden settings. Methods/design This multicenter parallel open-label cluster randomized controlled trial is composed of three phases: I, baseline phase in which retrospective data are collected, quality of data recording in facility registers is checked, and expected acceptability and feasibility of the intervention is assessed; II, intervention phase with enrolment of index cases and contact cases in either facility- or community-based models; and III, explanatory phase including endpoint data analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, and post-intervention acceptability assessment by healthcare providers and beneficiaries. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative analysis methods. The community-based intervention includes identification and screening of all household contacts, referral of contacts with TB-suggestive symptoms to the facility for investigation, and household initiation of preventive therapy with follow-up of eligible child contacts by community healthcare workers, i.e., all young (< 5 years) child contacts or older (5–14 years) child contacts living with HIV, and with no evidence of TB disease. Twenty clusters representing TB diagnostic and treatment facilities with their catchment areas are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the community-based intervention arm or the facility-based standard of care arm in Cameroon and Uganda. Randomization was stratified by country and constrained on the number of index cases per cluster. The primary endpoint is the proportion of eligible child contacts who initiate and complete the preventive therapy. The sample size is of 1500 child contacts to identify a 10% difference between the arms with the assumption that 60% of children will complete the preventive therapy in the standard of care arm. Discussion This study will provide evidence of the impact of a community-based intervention on household child contact screening and management of TB preventive therapy in order to improve care and prevention of childhood TB in low-resource high-burden settings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03832023. Registered on 6 February 2019

scholarly journals The Costs of Home-Based ART Initiation and Mobile Refill in Uganda

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S436-S436
Author(s):  
D Allen Roberts ◽  
Stephen Asiimwe ◽  
Bosco Turyamureeba ◽  
Ruanne Barnabas
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Geographic Area ◽  
Outreach Worker ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Time And Motion Studies ◽  
Art Initiation ◽  
Time And Motion ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Motion Studies

Abstract Background Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is effective at reducing HIV-associated morbidity, mortality, and transmission, but 20 million people who meet WHO eligibility criteria for ART are not in care. While decentralized care is a promising strategy to expand ART access, the costs of implementing a community-based model on a large scale remain unknown. Methods The DO-ART study is a randomized trial of community- vs. clinic-centered ART delivery in South Africa and Uganda using 12-month viral suppression as the primary outcome. We evaluated the costs of home-based ART initiation and refill in southwest Uganda using time-and-motion studies, staff interviews, and budgetary analysis. Costs categories included medications, supplies, personnel, building and utilities, start-up, vehicles, and community mobilization. We used a programmatic perspective with a 3% discount rate and removed research-associated costs. Results The largest cost categories included medications, supplies, and salaries, constituting 41%, 27%, and 17% of the total cost, respectively. Time-and-motion studies revealed that each outreach worker could serve an average of three patients per day in a fully decentralized model. In a scenario of providing home-based ART to 1400 patients aross seven sub-counties, the yearly per-patient cost was estimated to be $304 (2016 USD), which is similar to literature reports of the costs of facility-based ART provision. Conclusion These estimates suggest that home-based ART may be a realistic delivery option, especially if it is found to be effective at improving viral suppression. Further research is needed to evaluate how this intervention can most efficiently scale to provide widespread ART access over a large geographic area. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Rapid Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Initiation at a Community-Based Clinic in Jackson, MS

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney E. Sims Gomillia ◽  
Kandis V. Backus ◽  
James B. Brock ◽  
Sandra C. Melvin ◽  
Jason J. Parham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Hiv Care ◽  
Virologic Suppression ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Art Initiation ◽  
Healthcare Center ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART), ideally initiated within twenty-four hours of diagnosis, may be crucial in efforts to increase virologic suppression and reduce HIV transmission. Recent studies, including demonstration projects in large metropolitan areas such as Atlanta, Georgia; New Orleans, Louisiana; San Francisco, California; and Washington D.C., have demonstrated that rapid ART initiation is a novel tool for expediting viral suppression in clinical settings. Here we present an evaluation of the impact of a rapid ART initiation program in a community-based clinic in Jackson, MS. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who were diagnosed with HIV at Open Arms Healthcare Center or were linked to the clinic for HIV care by the Mississippi State Department of Health Disease Intervention Specialists from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Initial viral load, CD4+ T cell count, issuance of an electronic prescription (e-script), subsequent viral loads until suppressed and patient demographics were collected for each individual seen in clinic during the review period. Viral suppression was defined as a viral load less than 200 copies/mL. Rapid ART initiation was defined as receiving an e-script for antiretrovirals within seven days of diagnosis. Results Between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018, 70 individuals were diagnosed with HIV and presented to Open Arms Healthcare Center, of which 63 (90%) completed an initial HIV counseling visit. Twenty-seven percent of patients were provided with an e-script for ART within 7 days of diagnosis. The median time to linkage to care for this sample was 12 days and 5.5 days for rapid ART starters (p < 0.001). Median time from diagnosis to viral suppression was 55 days for rapid ART starters (p = 0.03), a 22 day decrease from standard time to viral suppression. Conclusion Our results provide a similar level of evidence that rapid ART initiation is effective in decreasing time to viral suppression. Evidence from this evaluation supports the use of rapid ART initiation after an initial HIV diagnosis, including same-day treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document